Home
Dept of Defence
142nd Wing - Unit Flight Safety Program Assessment
142nd Wing - Unit Flight Safety Program Assessment
Jeff Reynolds

142nd Wing - Unit Flight Safety Program Assessment

Use this Template
Print as PDF
graphic of a hand making an okay sign ×

Free 142nd Wing - Unit Flight Safety Program Assessment Checklist

Use this Template

Information

  • Report Number

  • Unit Assessed

  • Assessment Date:

  • Unit Commander (Rank, Name)

  • Squadron Flight Safety Officer (SAFSO)

  • Conducted by

  • Location

Assessment Purpose

ASSESSMENT PURPOSE

  • Wing Safety office conducts an assessment of the unit's Mishap Prevention program to evaluate its compliance with regulatory requirements according to United States Law, applicable Department of Defense, Air Force and Air National Guard instruction.

    Assessment Overview: The goal of the assessment is to identify gaps in the unit Commander's Mishap Prevention Program that exposes the unit’s personnel and Commander to unnecessary risk. It should be used to provide unit leadership awareness to areas requiring additional resources and support from the Wing Safety office. This assessment is required by Public Law, DOD Requirements, and Air Force Instructions.

    The Wing Safety office will track all program deficiencies. Supervisors and USRs are responsible for providing status updates every 30 days. All identified deficiencies are in the following report.

TERMS & DEFINITIONS

  • DEFICIENCY: A validated deficiency assessed as CRITICAL, SIGNIFICANT, or MINOR:

    - CRITICAL: Any deficiency that results or could result in widespread negative mission impact or failure.

    - SIGNIFICANT: A validated deficiency that has or could have negative mission impact.

    - MINOR: A validated deficiency that does not meet the definition of a Critical or Significant Deficiency but requires corrective action.

    OBSERVATION: General statement made by inspector regarding a process, inspection item or area of interest.

    RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT AREA (RIA): An identified process, product, or capability which could be improved by a suggested course of action.

GRADING

  • Possible assessment grades are:

    MET AND EFFECTIVE: All program elements of the flight safety program conformance and effectiveness under the Air Force Safety Management System (AFSMS) were found to be effective.

    EFFECTIVE BUT NEEDS MINOR IMPROVEMENTS: Most program elements of the flight safety program conformance and effectiveness under the Air Force Safety Management System (AFSMS) were found to be effective, with some needing only minor improvements.

    EFFECTIVE BUT NEEDS SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS: A large number of program elements or a key component of the flight safety program conformance and effectiveness under the Air Force Safety Management System (AFSMS) are in need of improvement, but the program was overall effective.

    NOT EFFECTIVE: A large number of program elements or a key component of the flight safety program conformance and effectiveness under the Air Force Safety Management System (AFSMS) was found to be ineffective.

AFI 91-202_ANGSUP Flight Safety Program Assessment Checklist

1. Commander Responsibilities & Program Leadership

  • 1.1. Has the installation commander implemented and provided resources for the [Flight] mishap prevention program (T-1)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.21.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.1.1. Has the unit commander(s) implemented and provided resources for the [Flight] mishap prevention program (T-1)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.27.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.1.2. Has the unit commander Implemented and used RM principles at all levels within the unit (T-2)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.27.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.2. Does the unit commnader support participation in SSG's and SSWG's to identify risks and hazards? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.18.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.2.1. Does the unit commander coordinate issues affecting System Safety with the MAJCOM Representatives, the Program Office, the System Safety Group, and AFSEC as appropriate? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.18.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.2.2. Does the unit commander ensure the unit risk management effort uses Program Manager’s System Safety hazard information in its risk assessments, as appropriate? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.18.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.3. Does the Medical Group support the Wing’s aircrew flight equipment and flying safety programs (T-2)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.24.11.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.4. Does the unit have an awards program to ensure personnel are recognized through the Air Force Safety Awards Program? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.5. Has the CoS completed, or been scheduled to attend, the Chief of Safety Course at the AF Safety Center or the ARCCOS Course within 90 days of assuming the CoS position (in no case longer than 180 days)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.1.1.2]

  • Deficiency:

1.6. Regarding the unit FSNCO:

  • 1.6. If an FSNCO is assigned to the unit or approved on the Unit Manning Document, are they a TSgt of GS-0018 or GS-0803 equivalent with a 7-level (T-2) and 2 years experience in AFSCs in the 2AXXX series AFSCs? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.1.14

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.6.1. If an FSNCO is assigned to the unit, has the individual completed the FSNCO course or equivalent and attended AMIC within 120 days of appointment (T-1)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.1.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.6.2. If an FSNCO is assigned to the unit, are they assigned the Special Experience Identifier (SEI) code of 307 and has AFPC personnel records assigned a code 39 to ensure 2 years of service (T-1)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.1.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.6.3. Do units that possess aircraft with enlisted crew positions consider appointing additional-duty FSNCOs to assist in the flight safety program? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.7. Is the Flight Safety Officer at the squadron level current in the unit mission aircraft? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.1.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.8. If the Commander of the flying squadron does not have an authorized FSO, has he/she appointed a Squadron Assigned Flight Safety Officer (SAFSO) as an additional duty (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.1.4.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.9. Once trained, does the FSO/SAFSO fill the position for a minimum of 12 months? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.1.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.10. Has the SAFSO attended the ASPM course and/or AMIC course in conjunction with MAJCOM/FOA/DRU supplemental training? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.1.4.3]

  • Deficiency:

1.11. Does the Wing have, and has the installation Safety Office reviewed, procedures for: [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16]

  • 1.11.1. Disaster response required by AFI 10-2501? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.11.2. HAZMAT response required by AFI 10-2501? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.11.3. Response to inflight and ground emergencies? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.11.4. Response to severe weather watches and warnings? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.11.5. Crash recovery plans? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16.5]

  • 1.11.6. Notifying and convening investigation boards? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.11.7. Missing aircraft? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16.7]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.11.8. Training for extracting crewmembers from local and common transient aircraft? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.16.8]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.11.9. Response to wildlife strike event? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.2.2.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.12. Has the unit developed an aviation-sepcific portion of the Installation Emergency Management Plan and does the plan define the roles, responsibilities, and notification requirements for leadership and all involved agenicies? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.2.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.13. Does the SAFSO carry out normal Wing Safety duties as requested by the Wing Chief of Safety? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5]

  • Deficiency:

1.14. Does the squadron commander ensure that the SAFSO: [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5]

  • 1.14.1. Upon appointment, contact the Wing Safety Office for required training (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.14.2. Administer the unit safety program using this instruction as a guide and management tool (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.14.3. Disseminate Flight Safety information to unit crewmembers (T-3) [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.14.4. Forward all flying safety matters of significance, which cannot be corrected at unit level through the unit commander to the CoS (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.14.5. Assist in conducting Wing Safety spot inspections as requested and conduct unit self-inspections (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.14.6. Ensure a current file of applicable safety directives, to include this instruction, AFI 91-204, AFMAN 91-223 and AFI 91-212 are maintained by the unit (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.14.7. Maintain Volume V of the squadron Flight Crew Information File IAW AFI 11-202, Volume 2, Aircrew Standardization/Evaluation Program, if applicable (T-3)? (note: use of Volume V is optional IAW AFI 11-202, Volume 2. If Volume V is utilized, procedures will be implemented to ensure all aircrews review Volume V (T-3)). [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.7]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.14.8. Maintain unit safety bulletin boards (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.8]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.15. Does the installation commander appoint an FSO as a safety advisor to the Aero Club, if applicable? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.16. Does the CoS conduct assessments/inspections of all assigned (installation) flying units' flight safety programs for compliance with USAF and Wing Safety requirements IAW Table 3.1 of AFI 91-202 (i.e. at least every 24 months for the program assessment and every 12 months for any inspections) (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.16.2. Is the program assessment prepared IAW AFI 91-202, 3.4.3 subparagraphs (i.e. declarative statement, unit name, date, etc) (T-1)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 3.4.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.16.3. Does the CoS include recent Program Assessment results in the APMR? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 3.4.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 1.16.4. Does the CoS inspect tenant unit flight safety programs IAW the host/tenant agreement (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.1]

  • Deficiency:

2. Risk Management

  • 2.1. Do pre-flight Risk Management (RM) assessment worksheets comply with current ACC/A3 requirements, and is RM trend data provided for OGV trend analysis and quarterly aircrew flying safety meetings. [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2. Are Deliberate RM worksheets (hardcopy or computer based) used to identify and manage risks associated with the flying mission? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2.1. Are these worksheets filled out before the flight briefing? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2.2. Are RM worksheets adjusted to be applicable to MDS requirments and the home or deployed operating environment? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.2, 2.10.2.5.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2.3. Is completion of the RM worksheet part of the Go/No-Go procedures? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.2.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2.4. Is the RM worksheet approved by the OG/CC? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2.5. Is the worksheet quantitiative (does it produce a numerical value)? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.5.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2.6. Are worksheets maintained for analysis, program improvements, and look back pursposes for 1 month? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.5.4/6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2.7. Does the unit perform a periodic review of the worksheet to ensure emerging hazards are address between operations and safety officers? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.5.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.2.8. Does the unit review/update RM worksheets when TDY or Deployed and does the unit retain these documents for a minimum of 1 year? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.5.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.3. Do Mission Briefs include identified risks and mitigations from the RM worksheets? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.3.1. Are thresholds established for various assessed risk levels and is the risk assessment for these flights with elevated risk reviewed by a supervisory authority other than the flight lead? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.3.2. For elevated risk missions, does the flight lead brief the appropriate supervisory authority on what risk mitigation steps have been taken? [AFI 90-802, ACCSUP, 2.10.2.3.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 2.4. Does the Medical Group support Wing RM, crew resource management, and maintenance resource management programs to optimize war fighter performance and safety in the operational environment (T-2)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.24.11.5]

  • Deficiency:

3. Mishap Investigations & Reporting

  • 3.1. Does the wing have a mishap investigation kit maintained with contents IAW DAFI 91-204? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.4.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.2. Does the Safety Office ensure mishaps are properly investigated and reported IAW DAFI 91-204 and AFMAN 91-223? Exception: Tenant units with full-time Safety staff will investigate and report mishaps for their unit (T-1). [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.12]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.3. Does the Safety Office assign office personnel to specific Class C-E mishap investigations when the commander has appointed those personnel as the investigating officer? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.12]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.4. Does the Safety Office maintain a list of potential Safety Investigation Board (SIB) members who have completed the formal training requirements according to DAFI 91-204 2.12.2 and AFMAN 91-223? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.14]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.4.1. Has the Safety Office provided the identified potential Interim Safety Board (ISB) and SIB members training annually on the basics of mishap investigation (T-1)? Note: This requirement is applicable to AFRC units who have identified individuals as potential ISB members or have established ISB support responsibilities through MOA/Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). This annual training is also required for Psychologists, Flight Surgeons, and Aerospace and Operational Physiologists/Aerospace and Operational Physiology Technicians, who have completed AMIP or AMIC (T-1). [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.15]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.4.2. Does the CoS provide annual refresher training on the basics of mishap investigation to pernonnel trained and qualified to perform ISB/SIB duties)? This includes human factors experts (e.g. Aerospace physiologists, psychologists, and flight surgeons) who have completed formal safety training such as AMIP, AMIC, MINA, or Introduction to Mishap Investigation course (T-1). [DAFI 91-204, 2.12.2.1 & 2.12.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.5. (ANG) Does the Safety Office post the list of SIB members to Wing SE SharePoint “Intelink” page in lieu of providing a copy via email? SIB listing will detail members for Flight Safety, Occupational Safety, and Weapons Safety and will be posted in the Chief of Safety tab. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.14]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.6. Is the Wing Mishap Response Plan Current? i.e. Annual review accomplished within the past year?

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.6.1. Is the Operations Group Commander familiar with their role required in the Wing Mishap Response Plan (MRP)? [142 WG MRP 91-2, Annex A]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.6.2. Is the Fighter Squadron Commander familiar with their role required in the Wing Mishap Response Plan (MRP)? [142 WG MRP 91-2, Annex A]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.6.3. Is the Airfield Manager familiar with their role required in the Wing Mishap Response Plan (MRP)? [142 WG MRP 91-2, Annex A]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.6.4. Is the Flight Surgeon/Medical Group Commander familiar with their role required in the Wing Mishap Response Plan (MRP)? [142 WG MRP 91-2, Annex A]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.6.5. Is the Maintenance Group Commander familiar with their role required in the Wing Mishap Response Plan (MRP)? [142 WG MRP 91-2, Annex A]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.6.6. Is the Mission Support Group Commander familiar with their role required in the Wing Mishap Response Plan (MRP)? [142 WG MRP 91-2, Annex A]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.7. Does the Wing safety office investigate high accident potentials (HAPs) and HATRs IAW DAFI 91-204 and AFMAN 91-223? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.8. Does the FSO ensure Hazardous Air Traffic Reports (HATR) reporting procedures and requirements are briefed at least annually to aircrew and ATC personnel? (See AFMAN 91-223, table 3.6 for Class E Hazard reporting requirements) [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.9. Does the CoS ensure that FSOs or designated representatives conduct annual training for unit personnel identified to serve as ISB members (N/A for AFRC)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.5.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.10. Does the FSO or Flight Safety Manager investigate reported flight-related hazards and report hazards IAW AFI 91-202 Chapter 4? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.11. Do flight safety perosnnel (FSO/SAFSO/FSNCO) inspect, assesss, and monitor flight-related workplaces, operations and support IAW AFI 91-202 Chapter 3 criteria? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.12. Does the CoS have a plan in place to brief an appointed ISB prior to commencing ISB duties IAW DAF 91-204, 2.12.3.1 to 2.12.4? [DAFI 91-204, 2.12.3.1 - 2.12.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.13. Does the CoS provide oversight and management of their organizations (and below) open recommendations? [DAFI 91-204, 2.12.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.14. Does the unit report Class E events (hazards) such as physiological, propulsion, flight controls, instrument, cabin pressure, and miscellaneous aircraft-related events as defined in AFMAN 91-223? [AFMAN 91-223, 3.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.15. Does the unit report Class E events (hazards) such as HATRs as well as High Accident Potential (HAP) events as defined in AFMAN 91-223? [AFMAN 91-223, 3.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.16. When AF personnel are found causal in a mishap, are they given an opportunity to submit a witness statement commenting on the findings? [DAFI 91-204, 8.11.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 3.17. If a member of the unit safety staff is appointed to an SIB, or appointed as a Single Investigating Officer (SIO), does this duty take precedence over all other duties? (AFMAN 91-223, Para 5.1.2) [AFMAN 91-223, 6.4.2]

  • Deficiency:

4. Mishap Prevention

  • 4.1. Does the Safety Office review airfield waiver packages, to include airfield construction phasing/safety plans (T-2)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.10]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.2. Does the Safety Office oversee the Bird/Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH) programs in coordination with Airfield Manager, flying operations and Civil Engineering. (T-1) [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.11]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.3. Does the Flight Safety Officer (FSO) ensure all personnel with access to privileged safety information receive annual training on the proper handling procedures and document the training (T-1)? (For those with AFSAS accounts, training may be recorded in their AFSAS Training Module). [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 1.6.22.13, DAFI 91-204, 2.12.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.4. Does the SAFSO conduct and document monthly spot inspections? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 3.7]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.5. Has the installation Safety Office established a BASH plan that defines the nature and extent of wildlife hazards and how the plan's hazard mitigation measures should be implemented? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.5.1. Is the BASH plan implementation consistent with all program requirements IAW AFI 91-212? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.2.2.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.5.2. Is the BASH plan reviewed annually for accuracy and compliance with current directives, revising as necessary? (Ensure all tenant units are included in the base BASH plan) [AFI 91-212, 1.3.5.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.5.3. Does the Safety Office participate in a Bird Hazard Working Group (BHWG) consisting of organizations involved in airfield wildlife control, habitat management, operations and safety, meeting at least semi-annually, with minutes maintained? [AFI 91-212, 1.3.10.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.5.4. Do supervisors and aircrews evaluate mission needs before conducting operations in areas under BWC SEVERE? [AFI 91-212, 4.1.1.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.5.5. For every bird strike, does the unit investigating officer send the remains (if available) to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History for identification? [AFMAN 91-223, 9.2.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.5.6. For every bird strike, does the unit investige and report the strike as a Class E mishap in AFSAS? [AFMAN 91-223, 3.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.6. Has the installation Safety Office established a HATR program? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.7. Has the unit commander ensured that AF Form 651, HATR and AF Form 457, USAF Hazard Report are available to aircrews at the base Operations facility? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.2.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.8. Does the unit have a written MACA program? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.9. Does the unit Safety Office create, document, and maintain the MACA program on a periodic basis? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.10. Does the FSO actively engage and acquaint local flying public to the military flying operations and facilitate meetings as feasible? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.3.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.11. Does the CoS evaluate the midair collision potential with civilian operators and small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) and work with operators, Fixed Base Operators's, and agencies to reduce risk and minimize hazards? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.3.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.12. Does the CoS develop a MACA pamphlet for distribution to local civilian airfields and fixed base operators? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.3.3]

  • Deficiency:

4.13. Does the Chief of Safety utilize the following Proactive Safety Programs as part of the Wing Flight Safety program to mitigate risk and prevent mishaps IAW AFI 91-225? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.6]See B

  • 4.13.1. Military Flight Operations Quality Assurance (MFOQA)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.13.2. ASAP? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.13.3. Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.14. Does the CoS ensure the flying unit conducts a quarterly aircrew flying safety meeting? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.5.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.15. Does the CoS ensure maintenance units receive timely briefings on maintenance related mishaps and trends relavant to the units mission/MDS? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.5.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.16. Does the CoS ensure airfield operations personnel receive timely briefings on HATR and CMAV related events and trends? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.5.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.17. Does the FSO or designated representative attend Airfield Operations Board meetings, FOD prevention meetings, and Standardization/Evaluation and Training review meetings (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.5.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.18. If the CoS has designated any Flight Safety related areas "High Interest Areas" in writing IAW AFI 91-202, 3.8, have those high interest areas been inspected at least monthly and documented IAW Spot Inspection guidance in para 3.7.2? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 3.8]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.19. Does the CoS conduct an annual analysis and develop specific actions to reverse adverse trends (note: analysis should target specific problem areas with recommendations for commander approval and appropriate actions)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 5.4.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.20. Are mishap reports that are disseminated for prevention purposes (beyond AFSAS) sanitized IAW DAFI 91-204? After sanitation, are “Privileged” markings removed? [DAFI 91-204, 4.8.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.21. When using e-mail, is the privileged document password protected and the password transmitted in a separate e-mail? [DAFI 91-204, 4.7.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.22. Does the Safety Office ensure a publications library is established IAW AFI 91-202? (AFI 91-202, Para 2.5) Note: May be hard copy or electronic format. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.23. If Blue Four News is distributed to appropriate unit personnel, is it controlled as privileged information? [DAFI 91-204, 4.7.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.24. Do the Host-Tenant support agreements adequately address safety responsibilities such that there is no confusion of delineation of duties? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.25. Do flying units, units operating a test range and units with host base responsibilities who support these activities or as designated by the installation commander, have the use of a two-way radio (UHF/VHF)-equipped 4-wheel drive vehicle capable of transporting a minimum of four people and their associated mishap investigation equipment? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 2.4.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.26. Are all safety-related Deficiency Reports (DR) coordinated with the local Safety Office? (T.O. 00-35D-54 Para 2.2.6.7 & 3.4.2.3 & 5.4.2.4) [T.O. 00-35D-54 Para 2.2.6.7 & 3.4.2.3 & 5.4.2.4]

  • Deficiency:

4.27. Does the Airfield Manager coordinate with Safety on the following programs/issues IAW AFI 13-204, Vol 3?

  • 4.27.1. Bird/Wildlife Hazard Management? [AFI 13-204, V3, 15.1.1.3.42.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.27.2. Designating parking, loading and servicing of aircraft with hazardous cargo or live armament handling (e.g., guns, missiles and bombs) (Note: UAS/RPA issues are addressed in Para 3.10.3.2.1)? [AFI 13-204, V3, 15.1.1.3.42.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.27.3. Developing and applying plans to respond to aircraft incidents or accidents, in-flight emergencies (IFE) and similar disasters on or off base? [AFI 13-204, V3, 15.1.1.3.42.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.27.4. Determining Risk Assessment Codes (RAC) and applying ORM principles for hazardous airfield conditions? [AFI 13-204, V3, 15.1.1.3.42.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.27.5. Notification of conditions that may impact the airfield and /or flying operations. (AFI 13-204, Vol 3, Para 15.1.1.3.9) [AFI 13-204, V3, 15.1.1.3.9]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.27.6. Conduct and document an inspection with Safety before and after completion of any airfield construction, changes or additions to the flying mission or changes affecting aircraft parking/taxi procedures? [AFI 13-204, V3, 17.3.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.28. Does the Chief of Safety participate in the annual Airfield Manager's review of airfield waivers per AFI 13-204V3? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.1]

  • Deficiency:

4.29. When able, does the Chief of Safety participate in risk analysis of items needing waivers and work to eliminate those items. Consider these factors: [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2]

  • 4.29.1. The inspection of areas before use. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.29.2. The impact of maintenance and construction on daily flying schedule and emergency situations. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.29.3. The communications between the tower and contractor, and the availability of the contracting agent. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.29.4. Controlling vehicular traffic on the airfield and designating haul routes for contractor trucks. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.29.5. Briefing pilots and transient aircrews with updated information. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.29.6. Establishing the minimum allowable distance between equipment and the runway. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.29.7. Marking obstructions, controlling foreign objects and assigning hearing protection. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.7]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.29.8. Explosives safety criteria. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.8]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.29.9. The potential impact of construction on wildlife hazards to airfield operations. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7.2.9]

  • Deficiency:

  • 4.30. Has the CoS reviewed the initial construction plans on major construction projects for compliance with AFI 32-1023 and attend any preconstruction briefings to consider it’s affect on unit operations? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.7]

  • Deficiency:

5. Flight Safety Spot Inspection Program

5.1. Airfield Spot Inspections

  • 5.1.1. The Airfield High-Interest Areas? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.2. Ramps and runways, including taxiways, overruns, stressed pavement areas and unstressed pavement areas immediately next to runways? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.3. Engine-run areas, including engine exhaust standoff distances and condition of pavement to prevent Foreign Object Damage? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.4. Airfield Lighting systems, including runway lights, approach, taxiway, and ramp lights and vehicle control lights? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.5. Airfield Barriers and arresting gear? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.6. Airfield obstructions, including obstacles on approach paths. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.7. Airfield markings, including runway markings, distance markings, taxi lines, etc. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.7]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.8. Airfield signs, include distance remaining, instrument hold, visual flight rules hold, taxiway guidance, etc. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.8]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.10. Airfield vegetation and drainage. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.10]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.1.11. Wildlife hazards present on the airfield. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.1.11]

5.2. Operations & Maintenance Spot Inspections

  • 5.2.1. Supervisor of flying program. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.2. Runway supervision program. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.3. Emergency-response equipment, including crash-rescue vehicles, ambulances, communications and crash-recovery equipment. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.4. Bird/Wildlife strike reporting. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.5. Aircraft marshaling, fueling and towing procedures. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.6. Foreign object damage-control program, control equipment and procedures. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.7. Aero Club operations. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.7]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.8. Aircraft generations, engine start and launch exercises. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.8]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.9. Post-flight maintenance debriefing procedures. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.9]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.10. Unit and transient (installation only) maintenance operations. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.10]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.11. Product Quality Deficiency Reporting System. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.11]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.12. Flight safety information use in maintenance training flight. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.12]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.13. Maintenance engine-run training procedures. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.13]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.14. Snow removal plans and operations, if applicable. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.14]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.15. Deicing training for aircrew and maintenance, to include flightline-deicing procedures. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.15]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.16. Low-level routes, weapons ranges and drop zones. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.16]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.17. Functional check flight procedures. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.17]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.18. Assigned and attached unit’s flight workplaces, briefings and meetings. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.18]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.19. Life-support workplaces and training programs. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.19]

  • Deficiency:

  • 5.2.20. Egress training. [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.6.3.2.20]

  • Deficiency:

6. Small Unmanned Aerial System (sUAS) Flight Safety Program

  • What unit's within the wing have a sUAS program?

  • Do all units possessing sUAS's have a sUAS Flight Safety program? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • Were all units with a sUAS program inspected in this assessment?

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.1. Does the sUAS unit have a Squadron Assigned Flight Safety Officer/Flight Safety Manager assigned as an additional duty? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.7.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.2. Does the sUAS unit have a primary and alternate System Expert Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems officer for each UAS operated by the unit, for the purpose of mishap prevention? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.7.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.3. Is at least one Squadron Assigned Flight Safety Officer/Flight Safety Manager on a base supporting small unmanned aircraft systems will be ASPM and AMIC trained (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.7.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.4. Do the sUAS operations still adhere to requirements of AFI 91-202 chapter 7 (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.7.4]

  • Deficiency:

6.5. Does the sUAS SAFSO comply with the following responsibilities? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.7.1]

  • 6.5.1. Upon appointment, contact the Wing Safety Office for required training (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.1]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.5.2. Administer the unit Safety Program using this instruction as a guide and management tool (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.2]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.5.3. Disseminate Flight Safety information to unit crewmembers (T-3) [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.3]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.5.4. Forward all flying safety matters of significance, which cannot be corrected at unit level through the unit commander to the CoS (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.4]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.5.5. Assist in conducting Wing Safety spot inspections as requested and conduct unit self-inspections (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.5]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.5.6. Ensure a current file of applicable Safety directives, to include this instruction, AFI 91-204, AFMAN 91-223 and AFI 91-212 are maintained by the unit (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.6]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.5.7. Maintain Volume V of the squadron Flight Crew Information File IAW AFI 11-202, Volume 2, Aircrew Standardization/Evaluation Program, if applicable (T-3)? (note: use of Volume V is optional IAW AFI 11-202, Volume 2. If Volume V is utilized, procedures will be implemented to ensure all aircrews review Volume V (T-3)). [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.7]

  • Deficiency:

  • 6.5.8. Maintain unit Safety bulletin boards (T-3)? [AFI 91-202, ANGSUP, 7.3.5.8]

  • Deficiency:

7. CoS Special Interest Items

  • 7.1. Does the unit have a plan in place to ensure that if a mishap happens while deployed, the appropriate mishap response plan will be envoked and the reporting procedures will be conducted to the proper convening authority? [142 WG CoS High Interest Item]

  • Deficiency:

  • 7.2. Does the unit have a plan in place to ensure toxicology testing can be accomplished if there is not a full time flight surgeon on orders? [142 WG CoS High Interest Item]

  • Deficiency:

SIGNATURE BLOCK

  • Chief of Safety

  • SAFSO

  • Unit Commander

Overall Flight Safety Program Assessment

ASSESSMENT GRADE:

  • The unit flight safety mishap prevention program conformance and effectiveness under the systemic of the Air Force Safety Management System (AFSMS) was graded:

    • Met and effective
    • Met but needs minor improvement(s)
    • Met but needs significant improvement(s)
    • Not Effective

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

142nd Wing - Unit Flight Safety Program Assessment
Jeff Reynolds

142nd Wing - Unit Flight Safety Program Assessment

Use this Template
The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.

Related checklists

2022 Flight Safety Program Management - duplicate
Jeff Reynolds
2022 Flight Safety Program Management...
1 Downloads
back arrow for carousel
back arrow for carousel
iAuditor Logo Icon ©SafetyCulture 2022