Title Page
-
Site conducted
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
Loss of Control During Landing / Take-off
T - Challenging airfield / flight conditions
-
Airfields listed in OM Part C & Currently Licensed
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Monthly Review of the OM C Landing Sites
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Airfield Risk Assessment for Unprepared / Non-Compliant Locations
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Airfield in Unlicensed
-
OM A Section xx - EOCs
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
OM A Section xx - Special Ops
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Additional specialised training - eg deck landings
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Flight Crew land significantly outside the TD/PM touchdown criteria
-
Flight Crew maintain aircraft within stable approach criteria
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew perform a go-around if approach is destabilised
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew perform accurate flare and TD/PM touchdown
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew perform a go-around if the approach and flare will carry the aircraft outside the FATO
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Incorrect; Passenger Weight, Cargo Weight or CofG Limits Exceeded
-
All passengers, baggage and cargo weighed and manifested
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Dispatch Staff are trained in the compilation of Cargo and Passenger Manifest
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
PIC must be satisfied with manifest and conduct CofG calculations before take-off
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
All cargo and baggage appropriately loaded and secured before take-off
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Passengers supervised and required to secure themselves before take-off
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
XBR Passengers are handled iaw requirements
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew detect overload on take-off and set back down
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Consolidated Loss of Control In-flight (LoCI) Threats
-
Inadequate Performance and/or Mismanagement of Automation
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Malfunction of Flight Safety Critical; Component, Instrumentation or Automation
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Severe Meteorological Conditions
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Birdstrike; Resulting in Cockpit Incursion
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Consolidated Loss of Separation (Airprox) Threats
-
Loss of SA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew do not correctly manage aircraft to maintain clearance
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service
-
See - Continuing Airworthiness / MCM - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service BowTie
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
See - Maintenance / AMO PM - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service BowTie
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
Section Break - Top Event - Loss of Control During Landing / Take-off
C - Ineffective BowTie / HRM
-
QA Mgnt System - Threat Line Audit
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
C - Mid-Air Collision
-
HLO/ATC recognise the incursion and issues avoiding action
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew of both aircraft receiving TCAS RA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew responds appropriately to instructions and/ or TCAS RA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew of either aircraft detects and recognizes the conflict and takes emergency avoiding action
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
C - Unrecovered LoCI; leading to uncontrolled collision with terrain or in-flight structural failure
-
Automated systems that assist in aircraft recovery
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew performs Undesired Aircraft State (UAS) recovery procedures
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Aircraft protection systems limit certain manoeuvres (e.g.TQ_limiter)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Aircraft Type Certification (TC) margin between envelope and structural failure
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Emergency Response Plan (ERP) (See ERCM Manual)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
C - Aircraft Ditching
-
Flight Crew responds appropriately to LoCI (above)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Aircraft meet requirements for over water operations
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew and pax provided with life jacket and PPE
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew and pax HUET and survival training
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
C - Abrupt avoidance manoeuvre resulting in injuries
-
Flight Crew responds appropriately to LoCI (above)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Aircraft protection systems limit certain manoeuvres (e.g.TQ_limiter)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Cabin secured for flight by SOPs
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Cabin design features to minimise injuries (e.g FAK strapped down)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link