Title Page

  • Site conducted

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

Loss of Control During Landing / Take-off

T - Challenging airfield / flight conditions

  • Airfields listed in OM Part C & Currently Licensed

  • Monthly Review of the OM C Landing Sites

  • Airfield Risk Assessment for Unprepared / Non-Compliant Locations

E - Airfield in Unlicensed

  • OM A Section xx - EOCs

  • OM A Section xx - Special Ops

  • Additional specialised training - eg deck landings

T - Flight Crew land significantly outside the TD/PM touchdown criteria

  • Flight Crew maintain aircraft within stable approach criteria

  • Flight Crew perform a go-around if approach is destabilised

  • Flight Crew perform accurate flare and TD/PM touchdown

  • Flight Crew perform a go-around if the approach and flare will carry the aircraft outside the FATO

T - Incorrect; Passenger Weight, Cargo Weight or CofG Limits Exceeded

  • All passengers, baggage and cargo weighed and manifested

  • Dispatch Staff are trained in the compilation of Cargo and Passenger Manifest

  • PIC must be satisfied with manifest and conduct CofG calculations before take-off

  • All cargo and baggage appropriately loaded and secured before take-off

  • Passengers supervised and required to secure themselves before take-off

  • XBR Passengers are handled iaw requirements

  • Flight Crew detect overload on take-off and set back down

T - Consolidated Loss of Control In-flight (LoCI) Threats

  • Inadequate Performance and/or Mismanagement of Automation

  • Malfunction of Flight Safety Critical; Component, Instrumentation or Automation

  • Severe Meteorological Conditions

  • Birdstrike; Resulting in Cockpit Incursion

T - Consolidated Loss of Separation (Airprox) Threats

  • Loss of SA

  • Flight Crew do not correctly manage aircraft to maintain clearance

T - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service

  • See - Continuing Airworthiness / MCM - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service BowTie

  • See - Maintenance / AMO PM - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service BowTie

Section Break - Top Event - Loss of Control During Landing / Take-off

C - Ineffective BowTie / HRM

  • QA Mgnt System - Threat Line Audit

C - Mid-Air Collision

  • HLO/ATC recognise the incursion and issues avoiding action

  • Flight Crew of both aircraft receiving TCAS RA

  • Flight Crew responds appropriately to instructions and/ or TCAS RA

  • Flight Crew of either aircraft detects and recognizes the conflict and takes emergency avoiding action

C - Unrecovered LoCI; leading to uncontrolled collision with terrain or in-flight structural failure

  • Automated systems that assist in aircraft recovery

  • Flight Crew performs Undesired Aircraft State (UAS) recovery procedures

  • Aircraft protection systems limit certain manoeuvres (e.g.TQ_limiter)

  • Aircraft Type Certification (TC) margin between envelope and structural failure

  • Emergency Response Plan (ERP) (See ERCM Manual)

C - Aircraft Ditching

  • Flight Crew responds appropriately to LoCI (above)

  • Aircraft meet requirements for over water operations

  • Flight Crew and pax provided with life jacket and PPE

  • Flight Crew and pax HUET and survival training

C - Abrupt avoidance manoeuvre resulting in injuries

  • Flight Crew responds appropriately to LoCI (above)

  • Aircraft protection systems limit certain manoeuvres (e.g.TQ_limiter)

  • Cabin secured for flight by SOPs

  • Cabin design features to minimise injuries (e.g FAK strapped down)

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.