Page de titre
-
Gemba execution site
-
Achieved on
-
Prepared by
-
Comments / Remarques
Compo & Accessories Check
Check departement Compo & Accessories
-
Are CPT and Accessories warehouse are Clean, Organized and identified by the status of the stock (OK, NOK , Under control)?
-
Is there a specific conditions for Storage (Humidity & Temp) FIFO?
-
Are TSR & CPT reference samples available and validated from the PL?
-
Control Plan available? Critical and Major points are clearly known and formalized
-
Does the supplier use 4 point system inspection for CPT inspection and DKT SOP is available?<br>+ visual inspection - GSM - fabric widthh
-
Are all the inspection equipment identified with a unique ref., Calibrated and fit to the purpose ?
-
What is the reaction mode incase of rejection<br>(management of non conformity)?
-
Does the Accessories trim card ( Accessories book) is available for each style and validated ?
-
Does the supplier respect the AQL for accessories control ?
Cutting Check
Check departement cutting
-
Is there an SOP for the Relaxing process and does the supplier respect the DKT requirement in the application?
-
Does the supplier have a shrinkage report?
-
Marker conformity <br>Marker set up- Cutting direction notches, and draw patterns, and grain lines
-
Ql should confirm all notches, and draw patterns, markers, and grain lines
-
is there a procedure to control the cutted pieces and What is the reaction mode in case non conformity : Isolation & identification ?
-
Are SOPs available for cutting section ?
Assembly & Lines Check
Check departement Assembly & Lines
-
Are the workstations organized?
-
Are SOP known and applied by operators?<br>Does the SOP include the DPR ?
-
Are key (critical) workstations identified? & Are SOPs available for key workstations?
-
Are cut pieces and/or semi-finished products identified throughout the line?
-
Is the method of control clear and the control plan available to the in-line controller?
-
Is defect classification clear, known and applied by the inspector?
-
Is the reaction mode ( identified and isolated) clear in the event of defect detection?
End of line Check
-
Does the controller know/able to detect the difference between Critical/Major/ Minor defect ?
-
Are non-conforming products clearly identified differently from conforming products?
-
Are non conform products recorded ?
-
Is there a physical isolation between the under inspection,1st grade, repaired (in case of no hanger system) and rejected products ?
-
Are reworked products 100% rechecked in case of rework?
-
In the work station: is there all the validated production files/tools required : <br> - Measurement Chart<br> - Master Sample<br> - Tech.Pack<br> - DCS/ DPR <br> - Reaction Mode<br> -Control Plan adapted to the CC<br> -Calibrated tools ( if necessary )
AQL Check
-
Is the master sample and the Teckpach available, dated and signed by the PL and Supplier?
-
Is the controller well trained on control methods (DCS)? Does he refer to the master sample and the TP?
-
Can the controller detect the non-conformities? is the reaction mode clear in that case?
-
Does the supplier respect the AQL of Decathlon?
-
Is there a report for each inspection? Is it archived?
-
Are the measuring tools used calibrated and suitable for the inspection being applied?
-
Has the supplier implemented identification and physical separation for non-conform products?
-
Is the dimension of the carton controlled? by which tool? is it calibrated?
-
Is there an adapted control plan for each CC?