Information

  • Audit Title

  • Document No.

  • Client / Site

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Location
  • Personnel

Legal Requirements

  • There is a documented process to ensure all Health and Safety Acts, Regulations, Australian Standards, Codes of Practice and other requirements relevant to the health and safety of the company and on the project/site are identified.

  • A subcription services on its own will not satisfy this criterion.

  • Documented process/procedure (or similar documents) outlining how the organisation will identify OHS legislation, standards, codes and other requirements relevant to the organisation and each specific project.

  • OH&S Legal and other requirements register.

  • OHS plan and Job Safety Analysis (JSA)/Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS) ( with relevant legislation applicable to the scope of works, identified/listed/summarised witnin)

  • Project OHS risk assessment record incorporates identified OHS legislation, standards, codes and other requirements.

  • Identified legislation, standards, codes and other requirements are relevant to the jurisdiction and project risks

  • There is a documented process to ensure all workers onsite are advised of , and have ready access to, current Health and Safety Acts, Regulations, Australian Standards, Codes of Practice and other documents relevant to OHS.

  • On smaller projects, ready access may not include access on-site. Access to docments held at head office or on a company intranet by way of laptop are options deemed acceptable, provided workers are aware of how and where to access this information

  • Documented process/procedure outlining how the organisation will ensure workers receive communication and have access to identified OHS legislation, standards, codes and other requirements relevant to the project.

  • Records are available to demonstrate that workers have been advised of relevant projects OHS legislative requirements and/or how to access relevant legislation etc.

  • Toolbox/site meeting records.

  • Induction content and records.

  • There is a documented process to ensure all procedures, work instructions SWMS/JSAs and work practices reflect the requirements of current legislations, standards, and other requirements relevant to health and safety.

  • This criterion does not specifically require a company to reference the title or section of applicable safety legislation etc in the control measures. The emphasis is on ensuring that control measure reflect the requirements of applicable health and safety legislative provisions.

  • Company internal approval processes for procedures, work instructions and other OHS documents ensure the documents reflect the requirements of current legislations, standards, and other requirements relevant to health and safety.

  • A process is available to review each SWMS using a criteria that includes a review to ensure the SWMS reflects the requirements of current legislation prior to commencing work relevant to the SWMS.

  • All reviews have been undertaken for all subcontractor activities prior to the commencement of work

  • Relevant minimum requirements set out in jurisdictional legislation and standards are included in the controls within JSAs/SWMS.

  • The OHS plan, JSAs/SWMS and relevant safety documentation references/meets the minimum compliance requirements of relevant legislation associated with the tasks being carried out.

  • OHS plan, project OHS risk assessment and JSAs/SWMS contain, and are complaint with, relevant legislation, standards and other requirements.

  • There is a documented process to ensure Health and Safety Acts, Regulations, Australian Standareds, Codes of Practive and other requirements relevant to health and safety are monitored for changes.

  • A subscription service on its own that merely notifies the organisation of changes is not sufficient to fully address this criterion.

  • Documented process/procedure (or similar douments) outlining how the organisation will regularly monitor for and review changed in identified OHS legislation, standards, codes and other OHS requirements relevant to the organisation and projects.

  • A register of identified changed in relevant OHS legislation, standards, codes and other requirements is maintained.

  • the identified Health and Safety Acts, Regulations, Australian Standards, Codes of Practive and other requirements detailed for criterion OH3.1 have been updated and relect recent amendments.

  • Position description for manager responsible for the monitoring of legislation for change.

  • Registration tolegislation-based and recognised standards/codes update and alert services.

  • Internal processes are stablished to ensure changes are disseminated.

  • There is a documented process to ensure changes to Health and Safety Acts, Regulations, Australian Standards, Codes of Practice and other requirements relevant to health and safety generate a review of the company's procedures.

  • Documented process/procedure (or similar document) outlining how the organisation will review and update procedures, assessments, work methods, practices and training (where necessary) following changes in identified OHS legislation, standards, codes and other OHS requirements relevant to the organisation and project.

  • A register of identified changes in relevant OHS legislation, standards, codes and other requirements records the identified impact on the company procedures and any actions resulting from the review and needs for change.

  • Documented process/procedure that reviews the need for system changes following changed to relevant legislation, standards and other relevant health and safety documents.

  • There is evidence of system revision including procedures, OHS plans and SWMS etc when changed to legislation, standards and other relevant helath and safety documents occur.

Key Workplace Hazards/Issues

  • There is a documented process to ensure that hazard identification and risk assessment and risk control processes are conducted, documented and are in accordance with the relecant Health and Safety Acts, Regulations and Australian Standards and Codes of Practice

  • Documented process/procedure outlines the methodology for the organisation ot adopt when performing hazard identification, assessing risk and in determining controls (HIRAC).

  • Documentd process/procedure outlines when HIDRA is undertaken, specific tools used and nature of the records kept.

  • HIDRA is performed consistent with jurisdictional legal and other requirements.

  • Risk controls comply with or exceed minimum requirements contained within legislation, standards and codes of practice.

  • There is a documented process to ensure the project HIRAC process is undertaken by personnel competent in the use of the company's HIRAC methodology.

  • Documented process/procedure identifies and outlines the minimum competency requirements of persons performing, facilitating and reviewing the HIRAC processes of the organisation and project.

  • Evidence of formal training in the organisation's HIRAC methodology by persons performing, faciliating and reviewing the HIRAC processes of the organisation and project.

  • There is evidence available to deminstate that SWMS are signed off by a competent person.

  • There is a documented process to ensure project specific hazards, insluding public safety hazrds, associated with the company's operations, products or services are identified, risk assess and controlled.

  • Documentd process/procedure outlines the requirement to perform project level HIRAC

  • A project risk assessment has been undertaken, documented and considers all activities and operations relevant to the project.

  • Precesses and procedures have been developed to facilitate and ensure the implementation of controls specified within the project risk assessment.

  • There is a documented process/procedure to ensure the HIRAC process occurs for the purchasing of goods and services, pland and equipment (supply, inspection, maintenance, commissioning, isolation(, and labour hire arrangements.

  • Documented process/procedure that outlines the requirements to perform HIRAC prior to purchasing a good or procuring a service.

  • Plant risk assessments

  • Records of purchasing risk assessements.

  • Procurement process considers contractors and labour hire, assessment rish and corresponding risk control.

  • MSDS review prior to purchasing of chemicals and corresponding risk assessment.

  • Where the company is required to provide its services within a client's or other entity's workplace, there is a documented process to ensure the health and safety hazards that could affect the people and public a the workplace are identified, assessed, controlled and documented.

  • Documented process/procedure (or similar document) that outlines the requirements to perform HIDRA in relation to people and public within the other existing workplace are considered and addresses.

  • Client meetings or other ofrms of liaison with stakeholders (persons in contril of the other existing workplace) are undertaken to identify and manage both hazards form the other existing workplace that could impact on the project and vice-versa.

  • Emergency response planning considers interface between the other existing workplace emergency risks and response impact on construction project and vice-versa.

  • Evidence of an appropriate hazard/risk assessment carried out and where nescessary mutual arrangements in place for respective controls.

  • There is a documented process to ensure risks of identified hazards are assessed having regard to; The likelihood and consequence of injury, Illness or incident occurring and available information on the hazard including any records of incidents, illness and disease.

  • The documented HIRAC process/procedure requies consequence and likelihood to be considered when determining risk.

  • risk assessments demonstrate consequence and likelihood, whick has been determined prior to obtaining risk level for each hazard.

  • Supporting informaiton such as industry, organisational and project inciedn reports, hazard information, drawings, inspections and audit reports, other industry information, bulletins and alerts. change notices etc can be demonstrated to have been considered in HIDRA processes.

  • Hazards are assigned the relevant level of risk in accordance with the identified information.

  • Records of risk workshops are retained and deminstrate available information considered in the risk assessment.

  • There is a ducmented process to ensure identified hazards are assigned risk contril priorities, having regard to tht eidentified levels of risk.

  • Documented process/proceudre outlines methodology for evaluating assessed rick level and establishing control priorities based upon risk.

  • Documented HIRAC processes/proceudre give relevance to risk levle in determining control measures/priorities, as well as management of work processes.

  • Risk assessment such as the project risk assessment and supporting SWMS adequatley rank identified hazards and risks wich are addressed giving due regard to the risk level.

  • The risk register ranks the level of risk for each identifed hazard.

  • There are defined cirteria for addressing hazards in accordance with the identified level of risk

  • Risk evaluation criteria exists and management actions based on risk level are defined.

  • Permit to work systems are a means of assignng risk control priorities onsite. though these should be supported by an underpinning assessment process to determine which work activities require permits (ie. the highest identified risk activities for the site, have a permit to work process stablished as a hold point).

  • Risk levels should impact and lead to the extent and nature of controls implemented, i.e. the greater the assessed risk the greater the effort and levle of control required. Documented HIDRA processess/procedures should lead to this as an integral elemetn fo the process.

  • There is a documented process to ensure appropriate control measures are established for all identified hazards, in accordance with the 'hierarchy of controls'.

  • Documented process/procedure that outlines the methodology and constraints for selecting hazard controls adn in particulat requires consideration and application of the hierarchy of controls.

  • Safety Management Plan, project risk register and SWMS actively implement ther hierarchy of control methofology. This includes in order of priority.

  • Safety Managment Plan adequately assigns contols considering the hierarchy of controls.

  • There is a documented process to ensure that hazard identification, risk assessmane and risk control process is subject to an evaluation of the effectiveness of the process.

  • Residual risk is not specifically defined as a requirement of this criterion, or of the HIRAC process, however it can assist in determining if adequate and appropriate control measure have been determined within the HIRAC process.

  • Documented process/proceudre (or similar documented) that outlines the method for evaluating the effectiveness of both the overall company HIRAC process and the outputs associated with each stage fo the HIRAC process.

  • Evidence of reviews addressing the effectiveness of the risk assessments completed including, for JSAS/SWMS, projects risk assessment and where relevant any specialised risk assessment.

  • Corrective action process including process for validating risk controls.

  • Records of reviews are maintained.

Emergency Preparedness & Responce

  • There is a documented process to ensure potential emergency situations have been identified and the site specific emergency procedures/ plans are documented and regularly reviewed

  • Documented process / procedure (or similar document) that outlines the methodology for identifying all relevant potential emergency situations in the context of the project specific risks.

  • Evidence that the project risk assessment considered and addresses risks that could result in an emergency

  • Develop a site specific emergency plan based upon the outcomes of the project risk assessement

  • Processes for ensuring regular review, as circumstances change

  • There is a documented process to ensure emergency response arrangement s are communicated to all personnel and vistors. `

  • Documented process / procedure (or similar document) that outlines the methodology for ensuring relevant emergency response plan content is communicated to both workers, visitors and a client's site workers (where applicable).

  • site induction includes the emergency procedures/plans applicable to relevant personnel and visitors.

  • Emergency response arrangements are displayed on site.

  • Emergency response arrangements are communicated at toolbox meetings.

  • Emergency response arrangements are contained within the project OHS plan.

  • Emergency contact personnel are identified (e.g. notice boards or by different coloured helmet etc).

  • Workers are aware of the nearest evacuation point and where to go to in the event of an emergency.

  • There is a documented process to ensure emergency drills are planned, carried out onsite, their effectiveness evaluated and corrective actions taken where necessary.

  • Documented process/procedure that outlines they methodology for planning and performing emergency scenario drills on the project, evaluating effectiveness of a drill and establishing corrective actions to address and deficiencies

  • Emergency debrief and drill evaluation record

  • Emergency drill plan/schedule

  • Emergency drills are performed for emergency scenarios identified and frequency scheduled based on risk.

  • Corrective action records.

  • Records of practice drills for emergency situations.

  • There is a documented process to ensure designated emergency personnel (e.g. wardens, emergency co-ordinators etc) receive training and practice in emergency procedures appropriate to their allocated emergency response responsibilities and the degree of risk

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar document) that identifies emergency personnel designated to the project and specifies the training requirements necessary to perform the allocated emergency responsibilities.

  • There are records that designated emergency personnel have received training and practice in performing their emergency responsibilities as identified.

  • Training and practice is relevant to the site specific emergency response plans/protocols on the project.

  • There are records of sufficient training for all relecant emergency responces personnel (e.g. fire wardens or emergency controller, first aid officers)

  • training/skills register and/or copies of certificates.

  • There have been practice sessions held to test the suitablilty of emergency personnel and training

  • There is a documented process to ensure competent persons have assessed the suitability, location and accessibility of emergency equipment.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similat document) that identifies a requirement and the cirteria to review suitabliity, location and accessibility of emergency equipment on the construcion project, commensurate with ther project emergency prodecures, which is performed by competent persons(s).

  • The competency requirements for review personnel are defined and sufficient to perform the review/s having consideration for risk, establishied emergency plans and relevant standards and codes.

  • There are records of assessment for the project specific requirements for emergecny equipment needed on site with involvement for a suitabley competent person shown (i.e. fire brigade, emergency consultant, safety practitioner, relevantly qualified employee)

  • Documented evidence of an emergency equipment review.

  • Inspection reports and audit reports.

  • There is a documented process to ensure emergecny equipment, exit signs, paths of travel and alarm systems are inspected, tested and maintained at regulare intervals.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar doucment) that outlines a program that ensures relevant emergeancy equipment etc as identified for the project is inspected, tested and maintained. this may inculde, fire extinguishers, first aid facilities, exit siges, paths or travel, alarms systems and other relevant emergecny equipment on the project.

  • There are inspection/test records and maintenance records for relevant emergency equipment and requirements.

  • Inspection and audit reports including criteria for emergency equipment and requirements.

  • Emergency equipment testing sechdule and records fo tests.

  • Maintenance schedule and records of maintenance.

  • There is a documented process to ensure the management of dangerous goods/hazardous substances on the project/site.

  • There is a doumented process/procedure that outlines the managment of storage, handling and use fo hazardous substances and dangerous goods.

  • Hazardous substances and dangerous good are managed in accordance with relevant legislation, codes and standards and considers items such as:<br>- Labeling, signage and placards;<br>- Risk assessment requirements;<br>- decanting; <br>- Emergency showers, eyewash stations, and spill control and cleanup;<br>- Storage, compatibility and segregation of substances/materials;<br>- Prevention and minimising exposure to below workplace exposure standards (WES); and<br>- Training in safe use of hazardous substance/dangerous goods.

  • Aminifest and/or inventory is available for all dangerous goods and hazardous substances on site, depending on the quantities stated in the relevant legislation.

  • Records are available to demonstrat that dangerous goods/hazardous substances have been reviewed prior to use.

  • MSDS are readily available for dangerous goods and hazardous substances.

  • JSAs/SWMS are specific and incorporate MSDS requirements including exposure controls and specific PPE requirements.

  • Regular review is carried out of quantities of dangerous goods and hazardous substances.

  • Dangerous goods and/or hazardous substances being used by workers on site are registered in the inventory/manifest.

  • There is a documented proecess to ensure the first aid requirements have been assessed for the project, and the first aid system in place is appropriate to the workstation and organisational risks.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar document) that outlaines a requirement and cirteria to perform an assessment of first aid requirements on the project, and that is assessment considers specific risks on the project and worksite location.

  • First aid services and arrangements for the workplace are appropriate having regard to the type of hazards to persons at the workplace, potential activities to be performed, the number of persons at the workplace and the risk level of identified hazards.

  • Evidence that the first aid arrangements are a result of, or are linked to the project risk assessment.

  • Review of applicable legislations governing first aid requirements.

  • The firs aid kit is accessible and is appropriate for the number of persons on site and the type of hazards identified.

  • The type of firs aid equipment has been liked to an assessment of the risks involved and by persons with knowledge of the project scope of works and relevant potential injury and/or illness.

  • There is a documented critical incident response process to ensure assistance is provided to workers who are exposed to critical incidents at work. This process includes, but is not limited to<br>- Clearly defined rolles for the coordination and initiation of critical incident responces;<br>- Rehabilitation of injured workers; <br>- Employee assistance/counselling, including trauma counselling; and<br>- Process or procedure for review of incidents to ensure critical incident response procedures are effictive.

  • There is a docuemented process/procedure (or similar document) that defines and outlines project requirements for critical incident response and may consider a critical incedent recovery plan.

  • Processes to rehabilitate injured workers by providing for appropriate rehabilitation as soon as practicable after the injury occurs, so that recover from the injury is expedited. rehabilitation processess are consistent with relecant jurisdictional requirements.

  • The roles and responsibilities for the recovery from a critical incident are clearly defined, including those for coordination and initiation.

  • Evidence of review of incidents to ensure critical incident response procedures are effective

  • Workers witnessing or involved in critical incidents are considered in the recovery from the incident (i.e. Counselling, incident defrief and EAP)

Measurement & Evaluation

  • There is a documented process to regularly monitor performance against the OHS objectives and targets defined by the company and for the project.

  • this criterion will examine the link between corporate objective and targets, and how that is captured/carried through to objectives and targets set at the project/site level.

  • Corporate OHS objective and targets register.

  • Objectibes should be specific, measurable and objectie. Targets shall be lnked to specific OHS objectives

  • Objectives and targets incorporated within OHS plan

  • Records/reports of regular OHS performance review process e.g. monthly.

  • Management review processes measure and consider performance against OHS objectives and targets.

  • Records of review and resultant changes made to procedures.

  • Minutes from senior management/board meetings.

  • There is a documented process to regularly monitor/review the implementation of the OHS managment plan and update as required.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar document) that defines the requirements and methodology for reviewing the implementation of the project OHS plan and a provision for updating if necessary. The process hsould consider the suitability, adequacy, effectiveness and possible implrvement of the OHS plan.

  • Review periods can be time dependent or based on milestones applicable to the project program.

  • Evidence of pervious versions of the OHS plan

  • Project audits focussed on verifying implementation of the OHS plan.

  • There is a documented health and safety inspection program that:<br>- Defines intervals for inspections based on risk or statutory requirements;<br>- Incorporates a reporting and corrective action process;<br>- Uses workplace specific checklist(s) where appropriate;<br>- Monitors workplace changes, the effectiveness of control measures, compliance with work procedures and site safety rules;<br>- Complies with any statutory requirements for inspection e.g. plan, pressure vessels etc; and<br>- Requires input and participation from workers in the area being inspected.

  • There is a documentdd process/procedure (or similar document) that defines the requirements and criteria for performing health and safety inspections on the project.

  • The workplace inspection precess requires worker representative/subcontractor participation and it can be demonstrated that this has occured.

  • The workplace inspection procedure defines the frequency, content and competency requirements of personnel conduction the inspections.

  • Inspection program is appropriate to the type and level of assessed risk on the project/site.

  • Reports and corrective actions have been raised follwing the identification of non- conpliance, non-conformance or issues.

  • Inspection program defines and incorporates statutory inspection requirements in relation to plan and equipment e.g. lifting gear, temporary structures, mobile cranes etc

  • Records are available and demonstrate a trend of regular inspections being completed.

  • There is a documented process to ensure the requiement for workplace exposure monitoring of the workplace is assessed and appropriate monitoring programs are put in place where required.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar docuement) that defines the requirements and methodology for performing workplace exposure monitoring, subject ot various risk assessment findings (including within the project risk assessment process) and considering a range of workplace hazards.

  • Evidence of workplace issure considered withing the project or activity risk assessment.

  • Where identiied as required, workplace monitoring shall be performed by competent persons.

  • Workplace monitoring requirements may include (but not limited to)<br>- Chemical exposure (including dust and fibres);<br>- noise levels<br>- lighting levels; and <br>- radiation exposure

  • There is a documented process to ensure inspection; measureing and test equipment related to health and safety is appropriately identified, calibrated, maintained and stored.

  • There is a doucmented process/procedure (or similar document) that defines a requirement to iedntify, calibrate, maintain and appropriately store OHS related inspection, measureing and test equipment.

  • Maintenance and calibration logs maintained, where applicable.

  • Calibration certificates are available and issued by a NATA certified laboratory or IS9001 certified laboratory where necessary.

  • Verification of calibration stickers on equipment.

  • Equipmen is stored as per manufactures instructions.

  • There is a documented process to identify work activities where personal exposure monitoring/health surveillance is required, and there is a documented system for conducting this monitoring/surveillance.

  • There is a doucmented prcess/procedure (or similar document) that defines the requirement and methodology for health surveillance/monitoring consistent with relevant jurisdicitional requirements and level of risk subject to various risk assessment findings (including within the projecr risk assessment process).

  • A documented process for arranging health surveillance/monitoring with a medical practitioner is addressed.

  • Project risk assessment defines specific health monitoring/surveillance on the project.

  • Hazardous substance risk assessment has been undertaken.

  • It can be demonstrated that health surveillance/monitoring records are secure, confidential and easily retrievable when required.

  • There is a documented process to ensure information on health surveillance/monitoring is provided to relevant employees.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar document) that defines a requirement and methodology for communicating and providing health surveillance/exposure monitoring information to relevant employees as applicable.

  • Records demonstrating that health surveillance/exposure monitoring information has been provided to relevant workers.

  • Health records are stored appropriately, kept for the minimum time recommended by law and made available to individuals who have been monitored.

Incident Investigation & Corrective Action

  • There is a documented process, involving site/senior managment as appropriate, for the investigation of hazards, injuries, illnesses, incidents and other systems failures impaction on health and safety.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar document) that defines the OHS incident investigation methodology, level of investigation required and involvement of site/senior management according to the type of incident

  • Hazards, for example through a company hazard reporting system, are idenfified and investigated where appropriate.

  • Quality and extend of investigations performed are commensurate with incident severity (or potential severity).

  • Site/senior management as appropriate are involved in the invident investigation process.

  • Review and amendment of processess and procedures when corrective actions are identiifed.

  • There is a documented process to enaure investigations:<br>- are undertakend by a competent person(s);<br>- identify the factors(s) that led to the hazard, injury, illness incident or other system failure;<br>- recommend appropriate corrective actions to be takne; and <br>- prompt a review of company processes/procedures and work instruction/SWMS where required.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar document) that defines a process for performing OHS investifations and compentency requirements for those who faciliate or undertake investigations are defined

  • Investigation methodology established and implemented on the project shall be capable of identifiying the systems cause/s that contributed to the incident.

  • The documented investigation procedure included the requirement for any analysis to be conducted and a report prepared for review by assigned levels of management and prompts a review of company precesses/procedures and work instructions/SWMS, where required.

  • The investigation procedure requires that appropriate corrective and preventive actions be taken to prevent the rucurrence of an incident.

  • Records of re-evaluation of work practices after the investigation has been completed and reported.

  • Evidence of project OHS plan and/or risk register, procedures and SWMs being updated as a result of investigation.

  • Corrective actions reports and/or register exists.

  • There is a documented process to record and monitor corrective actions resulting from inspections, incident investigations hazard reports, internal audits or other poreceese. The corrective action process sets target completion dates and assigns responsibility for implementing and review the effectiveness of corrective actions.

  • There is a documented process/procedure (or similar document) that defines a requirement and methodology for establishing OHS corrective actions, including, where applicalble, centralised recording, monitoring and tracking close out of corrective actions.

  • A process of reviewing the effectiviness of corrective actions has been established and record of reviews produced.

  • Evidence that corrective actions resulting from incidents, inspections, audits and reports are assigned a timeframe for completion

  • Corrective actionlog/register which records and monitors the progress of corrective actions for all actions arising from incidents, hazard reports, inspections, audits etc.

  • Evidence that actions arising from incidents, hazard reports, inspections, audits etc have been closed out in the allcoated timeframe.

Management of Subcontractor OHS

  • There is a documented process to ensure OHS plans/SWMS/JSAs are submitted by subcontractors/workers, and these are reviewed by the head contractor, against defined criteria, and approved prior to the commencement of work.

  • Documented process/procedure (or similar document) that outlines a requirement for subcontractors to submit OHS plans/SWMS/JSAs prior to work and a process has been established and implemented to review each SWMS using an objective criteria (including consistency with jurisdictional and project requirements) and then approving its suitability prior to commencing work on the project.

  • All reviews have been undertaken for all subcontractor activities prior to the commencement of work.

  • The head contractor's site safety requirements include the provision of subcontractor OHS plan/SWMS/JSAs by subcontractor.

  • Site-Specific safety requirements are reflected within Subcontractors OHS plans/SWMS/JSAs

  • Subcontractor's job pack contains OHS plan/SWMS/JSAs

  • All Subcontractor's on site have relevant OHS plans/SWMS/JSAs

  • All workers are signed on to the relevant JSAs/SWMS.

  • There is a common system of site induction for all subcontractors and workers.

  • Documented process/procedure (or similar document) that outlines a process for site induction of all workers considering general safety induction, site-specific induction and activity based induction.

  • For project induction, a site specific induction training manual/syllabus

  • Records of generic induction for all employees e.g. red card, white card, etc.

  • Site specific induction records or electronic system

  • All workers onsite have been inducted onto the site and the names of subsequent inducted personnel are documented

  • There is a documented process to ensure subcontractors are involved in OHS inspections/audits, inculding the safety of;<br>- Plant;<br>- Substance;<br>- Equipment; and <br>- Temporary structures used by subcontractors.

  • Documented process/procedure (or similar document) that outlines a requrement to ensure subcontractors are involved in OHS inspections, OHS audits and where relevant, OHS taks obervations.

  • Evidence of subcontractors actively involved in site OHS inspection/audits/observations including monitoring the safety of plant, substances, equipment and temporary structures used by subcontractors.

  • Records of inspections and/or audits conducted on the project, including attendee list.

  • Schedule for incpetions/audits

  • Corrective action tracking system shows issues identified form inspections and/or audits and subcontractor involved

  • Plant inspection records including logbooks

  • Scaffold and formwork inspection records.

undefined

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.