Audit Template for HV Assets operated under EDF Renewables Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules
-
Site conducted
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
Audit Template for HV Assets operated under EDF Renewables Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules
6.1 Switch rooms / Substations/ Compounds.
-
Are all areas clean and tidy, is all equipment stored correctly?
-
Are all areas secure and locks in good condition?
6.2 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules - General Site Signage and Information
-
Site Single Line Diagram. Check the latest revision on the document control system prior to the Audit. And check Is this the version displayed on site.
-
Health and Safety at Work Act. Is there a copy of the Health and Safety at Work Act clearly displayed in the main Substation?
-
Electricity at work Regulations. Is there a copy of the Electricity at work regulations clearly displayed in the main Substation?
-
First Aid assistance poster. Is there a copy of the first aid electrical shock guidance clearly displayed in the main Substation?
-
Status diagram. Is there a status diagram displayed in the main Substation or Control Room, if so does it reflect the status of the system?
-
Is there a sign on the Substation with the current HV providers emergency contact details. Is it in good condition and legible?
-
Is there a ‘Danger of Death’ sign on the Substation door. Is it in good condition and legible?
6.3 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules - Authorisations
-
Do the EDF Renewables UK personnel on site have the correct ‘in date’ authorisations for the activities they are doing. (Possibly need to contact the EDF Renewables Authorisations Officer)?
-
Do the HV Service Provider personnel on site have the correct ‘in date’ authorisations for the activities they are doing. (Possibly need to contact the EDF Renewables Authorisations Officer)?
6.4 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules - Permit for Work
-
Does the Permit for Work have a unique number?
-
Is the Location of the work to be done clearly identified, It should also match the ID on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement , Risk Assessment and the site Single Line Diagram?
-
The ID on the Permit for Work should be the same as the ID on the Plant/Apparatus to be worked on. It should also match the ID on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement , Risk Assessment and the site Single Line Diagram?
-
Has a Key Safe key been issued with the Permit for Work. Where applicable is it identified on the Permit for Work with Key No. and Key Safe number?
-
Is the Key Safe secured with a Key Safe key. Does the Key Safe key number correspond with the key issued with the Permit for Work, has the Control Lock been locked on the key Safe and the Control Lock key removed?
-
Are the points of isolation applied for the work to be carried out clearly identified?
-
Are the points where Primary Earths are applied for the work to be carried out clearly identified?
-
Are the points of isolation locked, or fuses and links removed?
-
Are Caution notices displayed at all points of isolation?
-
Are all points of earthing secured with a padlock?
-
Are Caution notices displayed at all points of earthing?
-
Actions taken to avoid danger by draining venting purging and containment or dissipation of stored energy. Are the identified actions to be taken clear and unambiguous?
-
Are the identified Further Precautions clear and unambiguous?
-
The work to be carried out should be clearly defined and must be clear and unambiguous. The description should match the work to be done on the work order card, the Method Statement and Risk Assessment.
-
Is the Permit for Work signed, dated and timed by the Permit Issuer and is the name printed legibly?
-
Is the Permit for Work signed, dated and timed by the Permit recipient?
-
Have all working party members signed onto the Permit for Work?
-
Has the Permit for Work clearance section been filled in correctly, have any abnormalities or exceptions been identified on the document. Has it been signed, dated and timed by the Permit recipient?
-
Has the Permit for Work cancellation section been signed, dated and timed by the Permit issuer?
-
Has the transfer process for the Permit for Work been enacted, if so has it been followed as per the Safety Rules and have all sections been signed timed and dated?
6.5 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules – Sanction for Test
-
Does the Sanction for Test have a unique number?
-
Is the Location of the work to be done clearly identified, It should also match the ID on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement , Risk Assessment and the site Single Line Diagram?
-
The ID on the Sanction for Test should be the same as the ID on the Plant / Apparatus to be tested. It should also match the ID on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement , Risk Assessment and the site Single Line Diagram?
-
Has a Key Safe key been issued with the Sanction for Test. Where applicable is it identified on the Sanction for Test with Key No. and Key Safe number?
-
Is the Key Safe secured with a Key Safe key. Does the Key Safe key number correspond with the key issued with the Sanction for Test, has the Control Lock been locked on the key Safe and the Control Lock key removed?
-
Are the points of isolation applied for the testing to be carried out clearly identified?
-
Are the points where Primary Earths are applied for the testing to be carried out clearly identified?
-
Are the points of isolation locked, or fuses and links removed?
-
Are Caution notices displayed at all points of isolation?
-
Are all points of earthing secured with a padlock?
-
Are Caution notices displayed at all points of earthing?
-
Actions taken to avoid danger by draining venting purging and containment or dissipation of stored energy. Are the identified actions to be taken clear and unambiguous?
-
Are the identified Further Precautions clear and unambiguous?
-
Are the Primary earthing devices which may be varied for testing clearly identified?
-
The testing to be carried out should be clearly defined and must be clear and unambiguous. The description should match the work to be done on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement and Risk Assessment?
-
Is the Sanction for Test signed, dated and timed by the Sanction Issuer and is the name printed legibly?
-
Is the Sanction for Test signed, dated and timed by the Sanction recipient?
-
Have all testing party members signed onto the Sanction for Test?
-
Has the Sanction for Test clearance section been filled in correctly, have any abnormalities or exceptions been identified. Has it been signed, dated and timed by the Sanction recipient?
-
Has the Sanction for Test cancellation section been signed, dated and timed by the Sanction issuer?
6.6 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules - Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power (ROMP)
-
Does the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power have a unique number?
-
Is the Location of the work to be done clearly identified, It should also match the ID on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement , Risk Assessment and the site Single Line Diagram?
-
The ID on the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power should be the same as the ID on the Plant / Apparatus to be tested. It should also match the ID on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement , Risk Assessment and the site Single Line Diagram?
-
Has a Key Safe key been issued with the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power . Where applicable is it identified on the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power with Key No. and Key Safe number?
-
Is the Key Safe secured with a Key Safe key. Does the Key Safe key number correspond with the key issued with the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power, has the Control Lock been locked on the key Safe and the Control Lock key removed?
-
Are the points of isolation applied for the work to be carried out clearly identified?
-
Are the points where Primary Earths are applied for the work to be carried out clearly identified?
-
Are the points of isolation locked, or fuses and links removed?
-
Are Caution notices displayed at all points of isolation?
-
Are all points of earthing secured with a padlock?
-
Are Caution notices displayed at all points of earthing?
-
Actions taken to avoid danger by draining venting purging and containment or dissipation of stored energy. Are the identified actions to be taken clear and unambiguous?
-
Are the identified Further Precautions clear and unambiguous?
-
Are the Precautions which can be varied clear and unambiguous.
-
Has an Approved Procedure been issued with the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power, has got the necessary approval has it been referenced on the document?
-
Have the Safety keys issued with the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power been clearly identified?
-
The work to be carried out should be clearly defined and must be clear and unambiguous. The description should match the work to be done on the work order card, the Method Statement and Risk Assessment?
-
Is the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power signed, dated and timed by the Sanction Issuer and is the name printed legibly?
-
Is the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power signed, dated and timed by the Permit recipient?
-
Have all testing party members signed onto the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power?
-
Has the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power clearance section been filled in correctly, have any abnormalities or exceptions been identified. Has it been signed, dated and timed by the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power recipient?
-
Has the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power cancellation section been signed, dated and timed by the Sanction issuer?
-
Has the transfer process for the Permit for Work Restoration of Motive Power been enacted, if so has it been followed as per the Safety Rules and have all sections been signed timed and dated?
6.7 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules – Limited Work Certificate
-
Does the Limited Work Certificate have a Unique number?
-
Is the Location of the work to be done clearly identified, It should also match the ID on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement , Risk Assessment and the site Single Line Diagram?
-
The ID on the Limited Work Certificate should be the same as the ID for the area or on the Plant/Apparatus to be worked on. It should also match the ID on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement , Risk Assessment and the site Single Line Diagram?
-
The work to be carried out should be clearly defined and must be clear and unambiguous. The description should match the work to be done on the Work Order Card, the Method Statement and Risk Assessment?
-
Are the Limits of the Work/ Testing clear and unambiguous?
-
Are the identified Further Precautions clear and unambiguous?
-
Is the Limited Work Certificate signed, dated and timed by the Issuer and is the name printed legibly?
-
Is the Limited Work Certificate signed, dated and timed by the recipient?
-
Have all testing party members signed onto the Limited Work Certificate?
-
Has the Limited Work Certificate clearance section been filled in correctly, have any abnormalities or exceptions been identified. Has it been signed, dated and timed by the recipient?
-
Has the Limited Work Certificate cancellation section been signed, dated and timed by the issuer?
6.8 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules – Operation Isolation and Earthing Certificate
-
Does the Operation Isolation and Earthing Certificate have a unique number?
-
Is the site Location clearly identified, It should also match the ID on the site Single Line Diagram?
-
Has the Isolation Request Section been filled in and Signed and Dated by the Requester?
-
Does the Point(s) of Isolation description match the Plant / Apparatus ID on the Single Line Diagram?
-
Has the isolation been confirmed and signed and dated by the Implementer?
-
Has the Earthing Request Section been filled in and Signed and Dated by the Requester?
-
Does the Point(s) of Earthing description match the Plant / Apparatus ID on the Single Line Diagram?
-
Has the Earthing been confirmed and signed and dated by the Implementer?
-
Are the points of isolation secured with a padlock, or fuses and links removed?
-
Are Caution notices displayed at all point of isolation?
-
Are the points of earthing locked?
-
Are Caution notices displayed at all point of earthing?
-
Is the Operation Isolation and Earthing Certificate signed, dated and timed by the Issuer and is the name printed legibly?
-
Is the Operation Isolation and Earthing Certificate. signed, dated and timed by the Requester and is the name printed legibly?
-
Have all the Safety Keys from the isolation and earthing been placed in a Key Safe and has a key safe been issued with the document?
-
Has the Operation Isolation and Earthing Certificate cancellation section been filled in correctly, Has it been signed, dated and timed by the Requester and Implementor?
6.9 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules – Setting People to Work
-
Has the work appraisal form been filled in and signed by the Leader of the working party? (ER-H&S-FOR-0074 Work Appraisal Form)
-
Has a Pre Task Brief been carried out prior to the work commencing?
-
Has the Pre Task Brief form been completed? (ER-H&S-FOR-0075)
-
Has the Pre Task Brief form been signed by all the members of the working party? (ER-H&S-FOR-0075)
-
Has the Pre Task Brief form been signed by the supervisor of the working party? (ER-H&S-FOR-0075)
-
Has a POWRA been carried out prior to the work commencing? (ER-H&S-FOR-0076)
-
Has the POWRA form been completed? (ER-H&S-FOR-0076)
-
Has the POWRA form been signed by all the members of the working party? (ER-H&S-FOR-0076)
-
Has the POWRA form been signed by the supervisor of the working party? (ER-H&S-FOR-0076)
-
Have all the requirements of the ER-H&S Setting People to Work (SPTW) Procedure -PRO-0041 HV appendix 4 been addressed?
6.10 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules – Switching
-
Has the Switching Schedule being used been submitted to the Area Manager prior to being implemented?
-
Does the Switching Schedule being used have a unique number as per SRP 02?
-
Does the Switching Schedule have an accurate description of the job?
-
Has the Switching Schedule been checked and countersigned by another SAP?
-
Has the Switching Schedule been filled in with Switching steps and method, and each step dated, numbered and initialled with completion time entered?
-
Do any abbreviations used comply with the Approved abbreviations in SRP 02?
-
Is each page of the switching schedule numbered?
-
Is there evidence of remote switching devices i.e. Pendant, DLOP, remote panels, SCADA being used?
6.11 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules – Risk Assessment and Method Statement
-
Does the task on the method statement match the work to be done stated on the Safety Document (PFW, PFW ROMP, SFT, LWC)?
-
Does the Location of the work on the method statement match the Location on the Safety Document (PFW, PFW ROMP, SFT, LWC)?
-
Does the Plant / Apparatus ID on the Method Statement match the Plant / Apparatus ID on the Safety Document (PFW, PFW ROMP, SFT, LWC)?
-
Has the Method Statement been signed and dated?
-
Has the Method Statement been approved by the EDF Area Manager?
-
Does the task on the Risk Assessment match the work to be done stated on the Safety Document (PFW, PFW ROMP, SFT, LWC)?
-
Does the Location of the work on the Risk Assessment match the Location on the Safety Document (PFW, PFW ROMP, SFT, LOA)?
-
Does the Plant / Apparatus ID on the Method Statement match the Plant / Apparatus ID on the Safety Document (PFW, PFW ROMP, SFT, LOA)?
-
Has the Risk Assessment been signed and dated?
-
Has the Risk Assessment been approved by the EDF Area Manager?
6.12 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules- Application of Wind Turbine Safety Rules cross boundary isolation procedure
-
Does the work to be done require a cross boundary isolation under the Wind Turbine Safety Rules? If so is a cross boundary isolation in place?
-
Does the Permit for Work or Sanction for Test refer to the cross boundary isolation as part of the isolation for the work to be done?
-
Is there an AWP in place? Is it the correct AWP (refer to WTSR support procedure No.7)?<br>
-
Is the Location and Wind Turbine No. correctly identified on the AWP?
-
Is the work / testing to be done section filled in correctly on the AWP?
-
Are all points of isolation filled in, signed and dated on the AWP?
-
Are the points of isolation locked and cautioned and have keys from the isolation been issued to the Senior Authorised Person by the Authorised Technician?
-
When in force is the AWP in safe custody as required in WTSR Support Procedure No. 10?
-
Has the AWP been cleared and cancelled?
6.13 EDF Renewables UK Electrical and Mechanical Safety Rules – PPE and Test Equipment
-
Are the minimum requirements for PPE for the Location met by all individuals of the working party?
-
Is arc flash clothing being worn as per site requirements. Is it the correct standard for the work being carried, check requirement prior to site visit?
-
Are insulated gloves being worn. If date stamped are they in date?
-
Are the insulated gloves Approved by EDF Renewables?
-
Is all test equipment calibrated and in date?
-
Are Calibration certificates available for all test equipment in use?
-
Is the HV tester and proving unit calibrated and in date?
-
Is a Calibration certificate available for the HV tester and proving unit?
-
Is there evidence of the HV tester and proving unit being used in the correct format (prove, test, prove)?
-
Is there a rescue hook available at the Location. Is it accessible and identified?
6.14 EDF Renewables – Documentation and Safety Rules Equipment
-
Is there a Key Safe on site, is it in good condition with all keys available and identified?
-
Are there sufficient Safety Locks and Caution Notices on site, are they stored securely?
-
Is there demarcation equipment on site, is it in good condition and stored securely?
-
Are there sufficient pads available on site, Are they stored securely?
-
Are cancelled documents filed and stored securely at the Location?