Title Page
-
Area / Team
-
Equip. Unit No.
-
Date requested for review
-
Actual date / Time of review
-
Name of reviewer
-
Submission date
-
Area manager
-
Team leader
-
Review type
-
Location
Step 1: Initial Cleaning (Processing Equipment)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for ‘equipment’ (Review Items 1-5) + score for ‘people’ (Review Item 6)
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
1. Cleanliness of main body of equipment
-
Dust, dirt, oil stains and waste all cleaned off, and materials and tools put neatly in order (jigs, chucks, sliding parts, chutes, frames, beds, pipes, wires, etc.)?
-
Looseness, play, vibration, friction and overheating eliminated (nuts, bolts, jigs, rotating and sliding parts, chutes, etc.)?
2. Cleanliness of peripheral apparatus
-
- Hydraulic, pneumatic, and water systems
- Electrical control systems
- Other -
Dust, dirt, oil stains and debris all cleaned off (cylinders, solenoids, FRLs, motors, limit switches, belts, proximity switches, photocells, control panel
-
Interiors/exteriors, meters / gauges, etc.)?
-
Looseness, play, vibration, friction, buzzing and overheating eliminated (motors, solenoids, limit switch mounting plates, relays, wires, nuts, bolts, etc.)?
3. State of lubrication
-
Dust, dirt and oil stains all cleaned off (lubricators, oil pumps, level gauges, filler caps, supply pipes, etc.)?
-
Oil volumes and drip rates correct, and looseness, play, and vibration eliminated (contamination/degradation of oil itself, pipe joints, valves, gearboxes, oil temperature, etc.)?
4. Cleanliness of equipment surroundings
-
- Tools, measuring instruments, and spare parts all organised correctly?<br>- Guards, nameplates, labels, and other signs all displayed correctly?<br>- Unnecessary objects removed, and correct products and parts kept in correct places?
-
- Defective products clearly separated from good ones?<br>- Aisles clear and tidy?<br>- No scattering of dust/dirt from other equipment?
5. Contamination sources and hard- to- access areas
-
Chart drawn up plotting all sources of dirt, dust and oil stains, and areas that are hard to clean? Plan formulated for dealing with these?
-
- Improvements made to guards and cleaning tools?<br>`Checking through cleaning' being implemented?<br>- Cleaning areas clearly allocated?
6. Way in which TPM is being addresse
-
Do all team members have a good understanding of what TPM means, and are they all fully involved in implementing it?
Step 2: Contamination Sources and Hard-to-Access Areas(Processing Equipment)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for Review Items 1- 6
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
1. Sustainment of Step 1
-
- Cleaning levels achieved in Step 1 (Initial Cleaning) being properly sustained?
2. Countermeasures for main body of equipment
-
-Sources of dirt, dust, oil leaks, air leaks, etc. all plotted on a chart, and action taken to rectify them?
-
-Hard-to-access areas all marked on a chart, and creative improvements implemented to make them more accessible (guarding improved, original cleaning tools devised, everything sorted and reorganised)?
3. Countermeasures for peripheral devices
-
- Sources of dirt, dust, oil leaks, air leaks, etc. all plotted on a chart, and action taken to rectify them?
-
- Hard- to- access areas all marked on a chart, and creative improvements implemented to make them more accessible (guarding improved, original cleaning tools devised, everything sorted and reorganised)?
4. Countermeasures for equipment surroundings
-
- Sources of dirt, dust, oil leaks, air leaks, etc. all plotted on a chart, and action taken to rectify them?
-
- Hard- to- access areas all marked on a chart, and creative improvements implemented to make them more accessible (guarding improved, original cleaning tools devised, everything sorted and reorganised)?
5. Improvement and sustainment
-
- Lubrication points clearly labelled according to lubrication standards, so that anyone can lubricate the machines correctly?
6. Status of activities
-
- All team members actively involved?
-
- Plenty of original thought going into the improvements?
Step 3: Provisional Autonomous Maintenance Standards (Processing Equipment)
-
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
1. Sustainment of Steps 1 and 2
-
- Cleaning levels achieved in Step 1 (Initial Cleaning) and improvements made in Step 2 (Contamination Sources and Hard- to- Access Areas) being properly sustained?
2. Maintenance of basic equipment conditions (action standards for cleaning, lubricating and tightening)
-
(Cleaning Standards)
-
- Separate standards created for each equipment unit, area, etc.?
-
- Cleaning areas, locations and work duties properly defined and allocated?
-
- Cleaning methods and tools specified?
-
- Suitable cleaning times and intervals set and observed?
-
- Standards clear enough for anyone to follow?
-
(Lubrication Standards)
-
- Type and quantity of oil, frequency of lubrication, method and responsibilities all clearly specified?
-
- All lubrication points correctly labelled?
-
- Required lubricants always available?
-
- Lubricants stored neatly and systematically (lubricant storage areas clean and tidy)?
-
(Tightening)
-
- Nuts and bolts all correctly tightened?
-
- Any nuts and bolts missing?
3. Awareness of role in creating standards
-
- Teams setting their own standards?
-
- Standards being observed?
-
- Improvements actively pursued to make checking easier and enhance visual management?
Step 4-1: General Inspection (Fastenings)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for Review Items 1- 6
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
Sustainment
-
Steps 1 to 3 activities properly managed and sustained?)<br>- Action against contamination sources being properly sustained?<br>- Good improvements making hard- toaccess areas more accessible?<br>- Cleaning and lubrication standards completed and applied rigorously?
1. Skills Training
-
- Leaders and team members actively creating OPLs and compiling them into manuals to upgrade their skills?
-
- General Inspection skills mastered by all team members?
2. General Inspection
-
- Inspection done correctly, covering all items in category trained?
-
- Minor equipment problems identified reliably during inspection process?
-
- Action taken to deal with these problems?
3. Safety
-
- Progress made in identifying and fixing minor equipment problems that compromise safety?
4. Shop- floor review (Fastenings)
-
- All nuts and bolts, etc. correctly tightened?
-
- Any nuts or bolts missing or damaged?
-
- Countermeasures against loosening (locknuts, etc.) introduced where necessary?
-
- Flat washers used for oval holes?
-
- Bolts of suitable length used?
-
- Matchmarks inscribed on nuts and bolts susceptible to vibration?
-
- Same kinds of nuts, bolts, washers, etc. used in same kinds of locations?
-
- Spanners and other tools located and arranged for easy use (marked location for each tool)?
-
- Regularly- used fastenings improved for easy installation and removal??
5. Provisional Autonomous Maintenance standards
-
- Provisional checking standards completed?
-
- Improvements made to reduce number of checks required?
-
- Improvements done to make checks easier to carry out?
-
- Suitable checking methods and checking intervals adopted?
-
- Ways found to ensure that all checks are done reliably, without any being omitted?
Step 4- 2: General Inspection (Lubrication)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for Review Items 1- 6
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
Sustainment
-
Steps 1 to 3 activities properly managed and sustained?)<br>- Action against contamination sources being properly sustained?<br>- Good improvements making hard- toaccess areas more accessible?<br>- Cleaning and lubrication standards completed and applied rigorously?
1. Skills Training
-
- Leaders and team members actively creating OPLs and compiling them into manuals to upgrade their skills?
-
- General Inspection skills mastered by all team members?
2. General Inspection
-
- Inspection done correctly, covering all items in category trained?
-
- Minor equipment problems identified reliably during inspection process?
-
- Action taken to deal with these problems?
3. Safety
-
- Progress made in identifying and fixing minor equipment problems that compromise safety?
4. Shop- floor review (Lubrication)
-
- Lubrication points correctly and clearly labelled, with effective systems for ensuring that none is missed out?
-
- Correct lubricant types being used?
-
- Correct amounts of lubricant being used?
-
- Lubricants clean and not degraded?
-
- All lubrication pipes unblocked and undamaged?
-
- Lubricants always available when needed?
-
- Different lubricators, oil cans, etc. used for different types of lubricant?
-
- All grease nipples and lubricators undamaged and free of dust and dirt?
-
- Different lubricant types separated and arranged systematically in lubrication stations? Lids always kept on containers? Stations appropriately located and free from dust and dirt?
5. Provisional Autonomous Maintenance standards
-
- Provisional checking standards completed?
-
- Improvements made to reduce number of checks required?
-
- Improvements done to make checks easier to carry out?
-
- Suitable checking methods and checking intervals adopted?
-
- Ways found to ensure that all checks are done reliably, without any being omitted?
Step 4- 3: General Inspection (Drives)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for Review Items 1- 6
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
Sustainment
-
Steps 1 to 3 activities properly managed and sustained?)<br>- Action against contamination sources being properly sustained?<br>- Good improvements making hard- toaccess areas more accessible?<br>- Cleaning and lubrication standards completed and applied rigorously?
1. Skills Training
-
- Leaders and team members actively creating OPLs and compiling them into manuals to upgrade their skills?
-
- General Inspection skills mastered by all team members?
2. General Inspection
-
- Inspection done correctly, covering all items in category trained?
-
- Minor equipment problems identified reliably during inspection process?
-
- Action taken to deal with these problems?
3. Safety
-
- Progress made in identifying and fixing minor equipment problems that compromise safety?
4. Shop- floor review (Drives)
-
- V- belts unworn and in good condition? Pulleys unworn and properly centred?
-
- V- belts correctly tensioned?
-
- Visual controls introduced on V- belt covers to indicate direction of rotation, belt specifications, etc.?
-
- Lubricating oil penetrating fully between pins and bushes on chains?
-
- Chains unstretched and properly centred? Chains free of meshing problems due to worn sprockets?
-
- Bearings free of overheating, vibration or strange noises due to bent or off- centre shafts, loose fixing bolts, under- lubrication, etc.?
-
- Shafts, keys and couplings free of play (loose bolts, etc.)?
-
- Irregular noise in gearboxes, speed reducers , etc.?
-
- Gearboxes, speed reducers, etc. properly lubricated? Any overheating?
5. Provisional Autonomous Maintenance standards
-
- Provisional checking standards completed?
-
- Improvements made to reduce number of checks required?
-
- Improvements done to make checks easier to carry out?
-
- Suitable checking methods and checking intervals adopted?
-
- Ways found to ensure that all checks are done reliably, without any being omitted?
Step 4- 4: General Inspection (Hydraulics and Pneumatics)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for Review Items 1- 6
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
Sustainment
-
Steps 1 to 3 activities properly managed and sustained?)<br>- Action against contamination sources being properly sustained?<br>- Good improvements making hard- toaccess areas more accessible?<br>- Cleaning and lubrication standards completed and applied rigorously?
1. Skills Training
-
- Leaders and team members actively creating OPLs and compiling them into manuals to upgrade their skills?
-
- General Inspection skills mastered by all team members?
2. General Inspection
-
- Inspection done correctly, covering all items in category trained?
-
- Minor equipment problems identified reliably during inspection process?
-
- Action taken to deal with these problems?
3. Safety
-
- Progress made in identifying and fixing minor equipment problems that compromise safety?
4. Shop- floor review (Hydraulics and Pneumatics, plus water circulation systems)
-
- Pipes and units free of leaks and stains?
-
- All units effectively protected against dust?
-
- Motors and pumps free of irregular noise and vibration, and switchover valves, solenoid valves, etc. free of odd noises, strange smells, etc.?
-
- Correct oil volume and oil temperature in hydraulic units?
-
- FRLs being used correctly (correct oil volume, clean filter, etc.)?
-
- Hoses correctly installed, clean, undamaged and free of vibration?
-
- Pipes run above floor level, and properly supported?
-
- Pipes easy to inspect and service?
-
- Pressure gauges all in order (correct readings, easily- read dials)?
5. Provisional Autonomous Maintenance standards
-
- Provisional checking standards completed?
-
- Improvements made to reduce number of checks required?
-
- Improvements done to make checks easier to carry out?
-
- Suitable checking methods and checking intervals adopted?
-
- Ways found to ensure that all checks are done reliably, without any being omitted?
Step 4- 5: General Inspection (Electrics)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for Review Items 1- 6
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
Sustainment
-
Steps 1 to 3 activities properly managed and sustained?)<br>- Action against contamination sources being properly sustained?<br>- Good improvements making hard- toaccess areas more accessible?<br>- Cleaning and lubrication standards completed and applied rigorously?
1. Skills Training
-
- Leaders and team members actively creating OPLs and compiling them into manuals to upgrade their skills?
-
- General Inspection skills mastered by all team members?
2. General Inspection
-
- Inspection done correctly, covering all items in category trained?
-
- Minor equipment problems identified reliably during inspection process?
-
- Action taken to deal with these problems?
3. Safety
-
- Progress made in identifying and fixing minor equipment problems that compromise safety?
4. Shop- floor review (Electrics)
-
- Distribution panels, control panels and operating panels all clearly marked?
-
- Temperature in distribution panels, control panels and operating panels low enough?
-
- Distribution panels, control panels and operating panels all clean (free of water, oil, dirt, etc.?)
-
- Door seals, filters, etc. on distribution panels, control panels and operating panels all clean and undamaged?
-
- No irregularities in wiring or contacts (overheating, damage, unsafe layout)?
-
- Motors free of overheating, strange noises, vibration?
-
- Sensors securely installed in correct positions, and making proper contact?
-
- Sensors all clean (free of water, oil, dirt, etc.)?
-
- Sensors undamaged, with all lead wires correctly installed? Effectively protected against possible damage?
5. Provisional Autonomous Maintenance standards
-
- Provisional checking standards completed?
-
- Improvements made to reduce number of checks required?
-
- Improvements done to make checks easier to carry out?
-
- Suitable checking methods and checking intervals adopted?
-
- Ways found to ensure that all checks are done reliably, without any being omitted?
Step 1: Initial Cleaning (Assembly Shop)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for ‘equipment’ (Review Items 1-5) + score for ‘people’ (Review Item 6)
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
1. Cleanliness of surrounding area
-
- Floors free of dirt, oil stains, sawdust, waste material, nuts, bolts, etc.?
-
- All unnecessary objects cleared away?
-
- Cleaning tools, work tools, etc. all stored neatly in designated positions?
-
- Floor marking standards observed?
2. Cleanliness of peripheral equipment, assembly tools, etc.
-
- Free of dirt, dust and oil stains?
-
- All parts suitably tightened and free of wear?
-
- Electric cables undamaged?
-
- Equipment and tools kept in good condition and stored in a well- organised manner?
3. Cleanliness of trolleys, carts, shelving, work benches and other items on which parts are placed
-
- Trolleys, carts, shelves, work benches, etc. positioned correctly?
-
- Unnecessary objects cleared away?
-
- Trolleys, carts, shelves, work benches, etc. stable and in good condition, posing no safety - risks?
4. Cleanliness of storage points for assembly components
-
- Components stored neatly, in parallel and at right- angles (on shelving, pallets, trolleys, etc.)?
-
- Components clearly labelled to show at a glance what each is used for?
5. Contamination sources and hard- to- access areas
-
- Systematic feedback of suggestions to improve precision in upstream processes? - Chart drawn up plotting all sources of dirt and dust, and areas that are hard to clean? Plan formulated for dealing with these?
-
- Improved cleaning tools introduced? - Cleaning areas clearly defined and allocated?
6. Way in which TPM is being addressed
-
- Do all team members have a good understanding of what TPM means, and are they all fully involved in implementing it?
Step 2: Contamination Sources and Hard- to- Access Areas (Assembly Shop)
-
Pass levels :Score = total score for Review Items 1- 6
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
1. Sustainment of Step 1
-
- Cleaning levels achieved in Step 1 (Initial Cleaning) being properly sustained?
2. Measures for achieving appropriate levels of permanent stock
-
- Measures taken to ensure suitable stock levels are maintained?
-
- Improvements and modifications introduced to make remaining stock levels visible at a glance?
3. Countermeasures for peripheral equipment and assembly tools
-
- Sources of dirt, dust, oil leaks, air leaks, etc. all plotted on a chart, and action taken to rectify them?
-
- Improvements and modifications introduced to make remaining stock levels visible at a glance?
4. Countermeasures for component shelves and assembly storage points
-
- Chart drawn up plotting all sources of disruption to storage system, and appropriate action taken?
-
- Improvements and modifications introduced to make remaining stock levels visible at a glance?
5. Improvement and sustainment, and future plans
-
- Systematic feedback of suggestions to improve precision in upstream processes? Strategies worked out for sustaining conditions in the future?
6. Status of activities
-
- All team members actively involved?
-
- Plenty of original thought going into the improvements?
Step 3: Sustainment Standards (Assembly Shop)
-
Self: 90 or over
Area M.: 85 or over
Senior M.: 80 or over -
Result
- Pass
- Fail
1. Sustainment of Steps 1 and 2
-
- Cleaning levels achieved in Step 1 (Initial Cleaning) and improvements made in Step 2 (Contamination Sources and Hard- toAccess Areas) being properly sustained?
2. Efficient system based on work standards, checking standards and workplace management standards
-
- Precise standards created for managing assembly equipment, tools, and consumables?
-
- Cleaning and inspection standards created for equipment, tools, assembly areas and storage areas? Standards being observed?
-
- Inspection efficiency maximised; system allows problems or defects to be rectified quickly?
-
- Standards for component storage and placement clearly defined, and visual controls used?
-
- Work standards established and observed?
-
- Layout revised and improved to raise efficiency of assembly work?
-
- Assembly work schedule drawn up by team itself, displayed clearly, and properly maintained?
3. Status of activities
-
- Activity boards used effectively?
-
- Many improvement suggestions being made, and efficiency drive being actively implemented?
4. Improvement and sustainment, and future plans
-
- Improvements being actively pursued? Team discussing how to proceed to next step?
-
- Improvements actively pursued to make checking easier and enhance visual management?
Application for Autonomous Maintenance Review
-
Step No.
-
Review No.
-
Date
-
TPM Office
-
Area Manager
-
Supervisor
-
Originator
Team making application
-
Area / Line/ Team
-
Team Name
-
Leader’s Name
-
No. of members
-
Equipment to be Reviewed
Overall Status of Activities
-
Date last step passed
-
Preferred date for review of current step
-
Number of improvement suggestions
Status of Activities Relating to Current Step
Work Time
-
Total time (hr)
-
Total no. of people
Meeting time
-
Total no. of meetings
-
Total duration (hr)
-
Total no. of participants
Requested focus of review
-
Scope
-
Key points
-
Difficulties overcome
-
Other
Reviewer
-
Reviewer's Name and Signature
-
Duration of review
Conclusion
-
Date
-
Chief Reviewer’s Comments
-
TPM Office’s Comments
Autonomous Maintenance Activities Report
-
Date
-
TPM Office
-
Area Manager
-
Supervisor
-
Originator
-
Step No.
-
Area / Line/ Team
-
Team Name
-
Leader’s Name
-
No. of members
-
Topic
-
- Meetings held
- Action taken
- Training received
- Results achieved
Meetings = M
Action = A
Teaching = T
Practice = P -
Tap on '+' to add new Maintenance Log
Maintenance Log
-
Date
-
Category
-
Details
-
Participants (note time spent by each person)
-
Time spent
-
No. of people
-
Total Time
-
No. of problems Total time identified
-
No. taken on by team
-
No. taken on by other departments
-
Completed in current month
-
Carried over to next month
Results
Meetings
-
No.
-
No. of People
-
Total time
Action
-
No.
-
No. of People
-
Total time
Teaching
-
No.
-
No. of People
-
Total time
Practice
-
No.
-
No. of People
-
Total time
-
Schedule of Activities for Next Month
-
Focused Improvement Progress Check
- 1 Identify Situation
- 2 Select topics
- 3 Set targets
- 4 Plan activities
- 5 Analyse situation
- 6 Stratify, analyse, and track down causes
- 7 Take corrective action
- 8 Confirm and consolidate
- 9 Assess results and benefits
- 10 Review
-
Manager's views and advice (comments from review, etc.)
TPM Minutes of Meeting/Action Items
-
Team
-
TPM Office
-
Area Manager
-
Supervisor
-
Team Leader
-
Date (of Issue)
-
Step No.
-
Area / Line/ Team
-
Team Name
-
Leader’s Name
-
Recorder
-
Topic or agenda
-
Participants
-
Absentees
Details of Activities
-
Meeting Date & Time:
-
Action Date & Time
-
Teaching Date & Time
-
Training Date & Time
-
Practice Date & Time
-
Total time(hr.) x (people)=person- hrs.
-
Next topic or agenda
-
Next scheduled meeting; Date and Time
-
Place
-
Supervisor’s comments
-
Area Manager’s comments
-
TPM Office’s comments
Sign Off
-
Report Completed By (Name and Signature)