Does the clinical audit have a clearly-stated quality improvement aim and objectives?

Does the audit measure performance against standards for process and outcomes that are based on the best available evidence?

Are the standards clearly referenced?

Has a named clinician been identified to lead the clinical audit?

Is the named lead is a junior doctor working on rotation?

Is the audit to be undertaken in compliance with local governance arrangements?

Are the sample identification, data collection and analysis, and all other aspects of the clinical audit cycle compliant with the law and best practice on information governance and data security

Are all members of the clinical audit committee engaged in the clinical audit cycle from the start and in delivering the service to be audited?

Is a stakeholder group identified and engaged in the clinical audit?

Are any ethical or information governance concerns identified?

Did the stakeholder group sign off the audit aim, objectives, standards and audit method before data collection began?

Is the data set collected defined with reference to the audit standards?

Is the population of patients to be included in the audit defined with reference to the audit standards?

Is the audit sample size set, and the sample selected, in accordance with best practice guidance?

Is the rationale behind the sample size and selection method documented in the audit report?

Is any part of the data to be extracted from electronic health records?

Is any part of the data to be collected from paper health records?

Is clinical audit data analyzed using appropriate statistical techniques to measure compliance with audit standards?

Are the findings presented in a way which gave a clearest possible picture of performance?

Are the clinical audit findings reported with the appropriate level of granularity?

Are full details of the clinical audit method documented to ensure that any necessary repeat data collection to measure the impact of interventions was carried out in exactly the same way?

In the final report, are any unavoidable variations in the repeat data collection method documented and reported alongside the results?

Are the results shared with the stakeholder group?

Do the findings show compliance with standards?

Has the stakeholder group determined whether the audit needs to be repeated?

Has the stakeholder group determined whether refinements are required to the audit protocol and data collection tool for greater focus on shortfalls identified?

Have alternative approaches to ensuring that quality of service is maintained, such as some form of ongoing monitoring, been considered?

Have the results of the audit been documented and shared with key stakeholders, service users, the rest of the organization, and with the public?

Have learnings from the audit been shared with colleagues, both within the organization and across partner organizations, including commissioners, clinical networks and other professional groups?