Title Page
-
Site conducted
-
Conducted On:
-
Conducted By:
-
Location (i.e. Rusholme)
-
Specific Area Inspected (i.e. Wind Turbine Number / Workshop etc..)
-
Scoring Criteria
Compliant – No shortfalls identified, criteria met or standards required achieved
Partially Compliant – Minor shortfalls identified in the standard or requirement, minor opportunities for improvement identified and the standard is still to an acceptable level. (For Example -PAT Testing – Most items tested and in date however a few units have been missed)
Non-Compliant – The standard or requirement has not been achieved and deemed to be unacceptable. Immediate action is required to address the shortfall/s (Example – PAT Testing – Most items out of date and not tested) -
What version is the emergency response plan (is it within the review date and latest template)
-
Is the site address correct (are the details of the ERP correct and displaying relevant information for the site)
-
is the sub station location correct (are the details of the ERP correct and displaying relevant information for the site)
-
Is the asset information correct (are the details of the ERP correct and displaying relevant information for the site)
-
EDF Operational Control Centre emergency number correct?
-
IS the site map up to date? (does it include all assets on site including any extensions)
-
Is the site boundary correct?
-
Are the asset locations correct (LAT,LONG,W3W)
-
Is the emergency contact list up to date (are these correct for the location and do they include all relevant contacts including 3rd party where applicable)
-
Are all on site emergency provisions listed? Are there any listed that aren't available (visual check on site and cross checked with the ERP)
-
Are the emergency stop locations listed and correct? (visual check on site and cross checked with the ERP)
-
are there suitable diagrams outlining safe escape routes from the asset? (check against ERP for asset type)
-
Are teams aware of the emergency chain of command (knowledge of gold , silver and bronze escalation process)
-
Is there a nacelle and hub kit in the turbine (Photos if possible, inspection records, etc.)
-
Is there a defibrillator available (visual check of site Defib where applicable and any working party are carrying one at Point of work, inspection records for pads and battery checks)
-
Are there fire extinguishers in place and inspected (visual check on site, inspection records from statutory inspections)
-
Is emergency signage and notices in good condition (clear and accurate with relevant information and contact numbers where applicable)
-
Is all emergency lighting working? (confirm inspection and where issues if this is captured and controlled by other mitigation)
-
Is all equipment required in an emergency inspected (relevant inspection records for CRD, 1 shot descender etc)
-
Have all individuals had the required training (Cross check against WINDA and relevant 3rd party certification)
-
Are Local Emergency Services Contacts correct (cross check against ERP for relevant site)
-
when was the last exercise held (who participated, what was the scenario for the drill etc, has any learning been passed on)
-
All persons familiar with nacelle escape equipment (confirm they have used or familiarised with equipment)
-
have relevant Bronze commanders received training? (training records from E-learning)
-
Notes
-
Findings Discussed with the working party
-
Findings discussed with the Area Manager
