Melbourne Water Corporation - Major Hazard Facility (MHF) Control Review

• Control ID Number:

• Control Title:

• Site:

• Conducted on:

  Date

• Prepared by:

• Location:
  Address

• Personnel

MHF Risk Control Measures (CM) Information

• MHF Control ID:

• Control Title:

• Control Description:

• Is the control description correct/ accurate? Please enter the new description if found any discrepancies?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• New Proposed Control Title & Description:

Control Category

• Please select control type category?

  Select Alarm Contractor Management Emergency Management Interlock/ Trip Maintenance Inspection Management of Change Non Return Valve Operator Inspection Procedure (SOP) Release Containment Relief Valve Signage Training Ventilation Work Permit System

  • Alarm
  • Contractor Management
  • Emergency Management
  • Interlock/ Trip
  • Maintenance Inspection
  • Management of Change
  • Non Return Valve
  • Operator Inspection
  • Procedure (SOP)
  • Release Containment
  • Relief Valve
  • Signage
  • Training
  • Ventilation
  • Work Permit System

• Is the control category listed above?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• For other, please specify the control type/ category:

• Enter the Performance Standard Criteria:

For Alarm

• Is the control type/ category correct? Otherwise, please select N/A

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control fully implemented:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does the alarm exist? Has the alarms or the associated equipment been isolated or bypassed?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does a maintenance schedule exist for the alarm, including function test?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the maintenance schedule for the alarm considered appropriate? E.g. The maintenance schedule meets the requirements established in the RCM or it is otherwise assessed appropriate<br><br>

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Enter PM reference number in Maximo:

• Is the control fully functional?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the alarm maintained in accordance to the schedule? Has all relevant information been obtained for completion of the job (eg. Data sheets/ meters) <br><br>

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Have all maintenance reports received? Any follow-up activities required have been raised/ completed such as subsequent work orders?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• What is the history of failure/ incidents? Are calibration results within the critical operating parameter limits?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

For Trip/ Interlock

• Is the control type/ category correct? Otherwise, please select N/A

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control fully implemented:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does the trip exist? What asset triggers the trip and what asset does it trip?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Has the trip and associated equipment been isolated or bypassed?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does a maintenance schedule exist for the trip, including function test?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Enter PM reference number in Maximo:

• Is the maintenance schedule for the trip considered appropriate? E.g. The maintenance schedule meets the requirements established in the RCM or it is otherwise assessed appropriate<br><br>

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control fully functional?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the trip maintained in accordance to the schedule? Has all relevant information been obtained for completion of the job (eg. Data sheets/ meters) <br><br>

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Have all maintenance reports received? Any follow-up activities required have been raised/ completed such as subsequent work orders?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• What is the history of failure/ incidents? Are calibration results within the critical operating parameter limits?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

For Operator Inspection

• Is the control type/ category correct? Otherwise, please select N/A

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control fully implemented:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does the operator inspection exist?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• How is the requirement for operator inspection documented?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Are the requirements considered clear and appropriate?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Enter the SOP and Clause reference numbers:

• Is the control fully functional?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is there a record of the Operator having undertaken an inspection as described?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Take a photo of the last completion record sheet for evidence:

  Media

• Any follow-up activities are completed as required? (E.g. Corrective work orders raised?)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

For Procedure (Standard Operating Procedure)

• Is the control type/ category correct? Otherwise, please select N/A

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control fully implemented:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does the procedure exist? Is it located in the controlled document library in Inflo?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Enter the SOP and Clause reference numbers:

• Does the procedure have adequate review frequency and management sign-off (review information located in the categories tab in Inflo)?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the procedure current (e.g. No outstanding review/ work flows)?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• When the procedure was last reviewed?

• Is the procedure accurate and does it contain sufficient detail?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control fully functional?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Have site personnel been adequately trained or been provided on-the-job familiarisation for the procedure?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is there any substantive evidence of the procedure not being followed or being breached?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

For Maintenance Inspection

• Is the control type/ category correct? Otherwise, please select N/A

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control fully implemented:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control tagged as an MHF Asset in Maximo?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Enter Maximo Location ID Number:

• Enter Asset ID number in Maximo:

• Does a maintenance schedule exist for the asset?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Enter PM reference number in Maximo:

• Is the maintenance inspection (PM frequency and Job Plan detail) for the asset considered appropriate? <br><br>(E.g. The maintenance schedule meets the requirements established in the RCM or is otherwise assessed as appropriate)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the control fully functional?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the asset maintained in accordance to the schedule? Has all relevant information been obtained for completion of the job (eg. Data sheets/ meters) <br><br>

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Have all maintenance reports received? Any follow-up activities required have been raised/ completed such as subsequent work orders?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• What is the history of failure/ incidents?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Raised Actions/ Recommendations

• Please contact your area MHF Coordinator and discuss the actions/ tasks to be completed with the actioners

• All actions are to be entered into MHF Action Register database and please contact MHF Coordinator for individual unique reference number for monitoring/ tracking its completion progress.

• Action 1:

• Action 2:

• Action 3:

• Action 4:

• Action 5:

Control Review Ratings/ Audit Findings

• Audit Findings:

• Enter Control Rating (0-6 Scale):

  Select Rated 0 - Risk Control Measure does not exist (at all) as described in the Safety Case Rated 1 - Key components of the Risk Control Measure to prevent/ mitigate the major incident hazard from occurring are missing Rated 2 - Parts of the Risk Control Measure to prevent/ mitigate the major incident hazard are not implemented and parts of the control are not maintained Rated 3 - Risk Control Measure exists but is not preventing or mitigating the major incident hazard Rated 4 - Risk Control Measure exists as required but is not effective at preventing/ mitigating the major incident hazard or not being properly performance monitored Rated 5 - Risk Control Measure exists, is effective and is performance monitored but does not meet its performance standard Rated 6 - Risk Control Measure fully implemented and fully functional

  • Rated 0 - Risk Control Measure does not exist (at all) as described in the Safety Case
  • Rated 1 - Key components of the Risk Control Measure to prevent/ mitigate the major incident hazard from occurring are missing
  • Rated 2 - Parts of the Risk Control Measure to prevent/ mitigate the major incident hazard are not implemented and parts of the control are not maintained
  • Rated 3 - Risk Control Measure exists but is not preventing or mitigating the major incident hazard
  • Rated 4 - Risk Control Measure exists as required but is not effective at preventing/ mitigating the major incident hazard or not being properly performance monitored
  • Rated 5 - Risk Control Measure exists, is effective and is performance monitored but does not meet its performance standard
  • Rated 6 - Risk Control Measure fully implemented and fully functional

• Please contact your site MHF Coordinator if you determined poor control performance with rating 0, 1, 2 or 3 at the end of the review.

Other comments

• Please enter other comments (if any):

• Other supporting evidence/ photos:

  Media

Signature

• Please sign here:

  Sign