Information

  • Prepared by

  • Conducted on

  • Client / Site

  • Location
  • Personnel

  • Document No.

CREW COMMUNICATOR MEETING

  • Score: (0=They are not doing it / 1= Meets Expectations / 2= Exceeds Expectations)

  • Was the meeting planned?

  • Good Content?

  • Involvement? Engagement?

  • Related to current work?

  • Expectations are clear?

  • Notes/Comments:

HAZARD ANALYSIS PROCESS

  • Score: (0=They are not doing it / 1= Meets Expectations / 2= Exceeds Expectations)

  • Created and reviewed by the craft?

  • One readily available for each operation?

  • Specific (Not Generic). Pinch points, tie off points identified?

  • Updates/change in conditions identified?

  • Communicated with other crews in area, truck drivers, etc?

  • Current? Relevant safety policies are in HA or attached?

  • Are all riggers certified? Spotters identified for operations?

  • Notes/Comments:

WEEKLY SUPERVISOR SAFETY TRAINING MEETING

  • Score: (0=They are not doing it / 1= Meets Expectations / 2= Exceeds Expectations)

  • Is the meeting prepared ahead of time?

  • Agenda?

  • Quality training element?

  • Weekly Safety Assessments reviewed?

  • Trends Analyzed?

  • Is it an expectation that all supervision must attend?

  • How is management supporting the program?

  • Do we have a good way to capture deficiencies?

  • How?

  • Suggestions:

  • Is recognition a part of the meeting?

  • Notes/Comments:

CRAFT OWNERSHIP PROGRAM

  • Score: (0=They are not doing it / 1= Meets Expectations / 2= Exceeds Expectations)

  • Relayed back to the craft? (Successes, Outstanding Items)

  • Indoctrinations ran by CVIS?

  • Mass meeting is CVIS led?

  • Is recognition planned ahead?

  • Is it Visible?

  • Do the crews know?

  • Are they excited about it?

  • How are the crews able to make suggestions?

  • How is management supporting the program?

  • Is CVIS an effective link?

  • How?

  • Comments:

  • Notes/Comments:

RECOGNIZE CHANGE

  • Score: (0=They are not doing it / 1= Meets Expectations / 2= Exceeds Expectations)

  • Red Book or Mini HA available for each crew?

  • Do the crews know the expectations?

  • Are we utilizing this?

  • Have we defined and communicated what a 'near hit' means?

  • Is it clear to the crews how to report a near hit?

  • Notes/Comments:

EXTREME ACCESS AND HOUSEKEEPING

  • Score: (0=They are not doing it / 1= Meets Expectations / 2= Exceeds Expectations)

  • Part of initial plan?

  • Access clear of debris?

  • Walk through ladders?

  • Ramps cut at right slope?

  • Is the small stuff tolerated? (i.e. cut offs, banding, nails protruding, etc.)

  • Please describe:

  • Is the lay down yard organized and accessible?

  • Are you proud to say this is YOUR job?

  • Why?

  • Why not?

  • Does the crew enforce the plan?

  • Notes/Comments:

  • Completed by:

  • Signature:

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.