Title Page
-
NOTE: Assess employee’s performance in current position. Tick the most appropriate rating in each section.
Rating System
1 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Marginal
3 - Satisfactory
4 - Above average
5 - Excellent
-
NAME AND SURNAME
- ALECHEA JONKER
- ALICIA BOTHA
- ANDRIES GOUWS
- ANTON J V RENSBURG
- BETSIE VAN ZYL
- BOKANG JANKIE
- DASHY MPHUTI
- ELIZABETH TYIZEKA
- FLORENCE MOYENI
- HEIN VAN ASWEGEN
- HENNIE MURRAY
- JARID MONERON
- JOUBERT MULDER
- LOOD SLABBERT
- LUCIA NKOSI
- LUCIA MAGUDU
- MILDRED SELEPE
- MPHO NKOSI
- PATRICK MNCUBE
- PETER CHABALALA
- PRECIOUS MAZIBUKO
- RENIER CRONJE
- ROSALEA SENOOANE
- ROSEMARIE GROBLER
- SEUN MALEKA
- SHELDON WILSON
- STEFANO SLABBERT
- TAPPIE XABA
- THEMBEKA MLANGENI
- THOMAS MELA
- YOLANDIE DUVENHAGE
- ZODWA MOYENI
-
EMPLOYEE NUMBER
-
DATE OF EMPLOYMENT
-
POSITION
-
DEPARTMENT
-
PERIOD IN CURRENT POSITION
-
DATE OF LAST ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
-
KNOWLEDGE OF JOB - Employees knowledge and understanding of his/her job and related jobs
- Limited job knowledge.
- Understands basics of own job only.
- Understands own job and related jobs.
- Thoroughly understands own job and has a good understanding of related jobs.
- Expert at own job and can do many of the related jobs well.
-
QUALITY STANDARDS - Accuracy, efficiency, and attention to detail of work performed against set work standard/benchmark.
- Unsatisfactory. Many errors. No attention to detail.
- Just about meeting quality. Some inaccuracies.
- Accurate. Few mistakes.
- High quality of work. Very few mistakes.
- Highly efficient. Exceptionally high quality of work. Very seldom makes mistakes.
-
PERFORMANCE AGAINST OBJECTIVES/PRODUCTIVITY - Measure quantity against standard and promptness of delivery.
- Does not meet deadlines. Slow with output. Constant follow up required.
- Meets less than expected minimum. Low volume output. Follow up required.
- Meets minimum standard. Meets deadlines.
- Does more than expected. Output above average.
- Extremely willing. Takes on and completes new projects/work. High output.
-
INNOVATION / INITIATIVE - Resourcefulness and ability to proactively find alternatives to solve problems.
- Judgement unreliable. Ignores problem unless directed to act.
- Attempts to solve problems but unable to analyze available facts competently.
- Judgement is normally sound. Resolves most work-related problems within section without assistance.
- Carefully weighs up all information and suggests alternatives using sound judgement and accurate information.
- Exceptional ability for thorough investigation and data correlation. Ability to anticipate and resolve potential problems.
-
PLANNING & ORGANISATION - Appropriate planning, allocation & organization or resources for self and/or others to accomplish specific goals.
- Inadequate planning.
- Plans, but not very effective.
- Generally plans well.
- Plans competently and is generally well organised.
- Plans extremely well and is superbly organized.
-
ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY - Consider employees willingness to assume responsibility and ensure company procedures are followed.
- Does not accept responsibility.
- Accepts responsibility with reluctance.
- Accepts normal responsibility of job.
- Willingly accepts additional responsibility.
- Seeks and willingly accepts greater responsibility without hesitation.
-
TEAMWORK / COOPERATION - Willingness to work effectively with others by respecting contributions and accepting consensus; putting objectives of organization/team before own.
- Does not work well with others. Lacks cooperation.
- Sometimes difficult to work with.
- Cooperates with and obliges others.
- Goes out of his/her way to be helpful.
- Extremely helpful and cooperative.
-
DEVELOPMENT OF SUBORDINATES - Extent to which the potential of a subordinate is recognized and developed.
- Shows no interest in developing subordinates.
- Contributes, but little to the development of subordinates.
- Moderately successful. Usually assists in developing subordinates.
- Consistently interested in and actively develops subordinates.
- Extremely interested in the development of subordinates.
-
OVERALL JOB PERFORMANCE RATING
- Fails to meet requirements. Has major performance deficiencies.
- Meets minimum requirements. Just gets by.
- Meets all the job requirements.
- Clearly exceeds average performance. Better than expected.
- Rarely equaled. Really excellent performance.
Comments from employee
-
What can the company do to assist in improving your job performance?
Comments from employer
-
Overall opinion of employee in words
Sign off on performance review
-
Signature of Employee
-
Signature of Employer(Manager)
