QHSE Audit (Int'l)

• Title

• Location

  Select Canada USA UK Norway Equatorial Guinea KSA UAE Malaysia Kuwait

  • Canada
  • USA
  • UK
  • Norway
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • KSA
  • UAE
  • Malaysia
  • Kuwait
• Location
  Address

• Personnel Involved

• Conducted on

  Date

• Prepared by

1.0 - Corporate Programmes

• 1 -ALTUS HSE and Quality policy statements visible/posted, current revisions?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Employees aware of QHSE Policy Statement content and expectations? Aware of their authority and responsibility towards 'Stop Work Authority'?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - General awareness of QHSE 'License to Operate' Rules? Posted to local notice boards, visible throughout workplace?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Evidence of participation in proactive observation programme?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - Knowledge of current Company QHSE campaigns, awareness initiatives etc?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

2.0 - Knowledge sharing & awareness: Lessons learned

• 1 - Is there documented evidence of a regular inspection regime in place, including but not limited to full workplace inspections and management site tours?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Are there any outstanding actions from the previous inspection?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Review recent lessons learned from the global organisation; are these visible on local notice boards?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - When asked, do those interviewed show awareness of the incident and associated follow-up actions where relevant?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - Are lessons learned and recent incidents discussed during local meetings and/or toolbox talks? Ask to see evidence.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

3.0 - Task Planning & Risk Assessment

• 1 - Was a toolbox talk/JSA conducted prior to the work commenced? Ask for documented evidence. Do the minutes indicate a specific focus on the day's tasks and associated hazards and controls?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Do employees fully understand the task they're doing, and are they aware of the specific hazards relevant in their workplace? Ask them to discuss their task and explain the hazards and associated risk controls.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Are documented risk assessments in place for key high-risk activities (e.g. lifting and handling of tools and equipment)?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Evidence of task risk assessment (e.g. TRAC) in place for managing minor changes to tasks and/or addressing task-based hazards?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - Is the Company Management of Change process understood with respect to when it should be applied?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 6 - Is the Management of Change register updated to reflect recent changes?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1 - Are cabinets and contents clean and orderly?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Are contents regularly checked and within expiry dates?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Cabinets clearly labelled?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - Is there easy access to cabinets?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 6 - Employees aware of location of first aid cabinet, cabinets accessible?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 8 - Are emergency numbers displayed?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1 - Evacuation plan displayed and understood by all employees?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Evacuation procedures discussed regularly? (3 to 4 times a year)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Extinguishers in place, clearly marked for type of fire and clear of obstructions?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Extinguishers recently serviced? (Check 6 monthly punch mark on tabs.)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - Extinguisher no more than 1200 mm max height & base not lower that 100 mm?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 6 - Adequate direction notices for fire exits?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7 - Exit doors easily opened from inside?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 8 - Exits clear of obstructions?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 9 - Fire alarm system functioning correctly (where applicable)?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1 - Personnel are able to logon and navigate within inSite to appropriate landing page

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Personnel can demonstrate how to find a procedure/checklist/tech alert in inSite

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Personnel are able to logon and navigate within QDesk

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Personnel can demonstrate how to find user and maintenance manuals in QDesk

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - Personnel are able to navigate to and enter a Synergi case

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 6 - Personnel are able to navigate to and enter a ticket within QDesk

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7 - Personnel are able to articulate circumstances under which a Synergi and/or QDesk ticket shall be submitted

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 8 - Personnel are able to locate standard reporting templates for problem reports as well SIT’s in QDesk

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1 - Personnel know how and where to locate Company & third party procedures and checklists?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Training has been identified and scheduled for each employee?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Have all assigned training requirements been completed?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Select a task or item of equipment: can the employee/operator demonstrate their competence through training, practical knowledge and experienc?

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

Job Planning (SEM)

Requirements

• Customer requirements defined (e.g. client data sheet) and recorded in relevant job files?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Jobs assessed for criticality as part of planning in order to determine peer review level?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Plan & Prepare

• Well simulations/modelling completed and approved by the customer?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Evidence of peer review according to criticality rating on client data sheet?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Job-specific risk assessment, SIT (where required), pre-job briefing and load-out checks completed?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Perform Service

• Relevant pre-run checklists completed?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Reporting as per company and customer requirments?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Examples of Stop Work Authority and/or Management of Change?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Close-out

• Customer feedback completed - low scoring (<3) forms with Synergi case?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Synergi / QDesk cases raised where relevant?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Run records updated, completed jobs have records updated on shared drive?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Field service order is validated vs. contract pricing, invoice issued for recently completed jobs?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Maintenance Records

• 1 - Are current documents, procedures, and policies being utilized?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Are the PM1 and PM3 checklists being utilized for all equipment prior to use in the field?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Are the completed PM1 and PM3 docs filed (hardcopy and on shared drive, available for inspection)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Are the PM1 and PM3 documents current revision?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - Are the checklists provided filled out in their entirety?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 6 - Are Tech Alerts available to all personnel and documented on relevant tool history folders?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7 - How are PM3 due dates on surface equipment tracked?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 8 - How are PM3 due dates on downhole equipment tracked? e.g. PM3 at 30,000 ft?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1 - Where applicable are assemblies being identified by markings/labels to maintain traceability?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Do serial numbers on tagged equipment match most recent PM checklists?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Discrepant material had been clearly marked/ identified and segregated to prevent unintentional use?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Chemicals and other shelf life items (activator, loctite etc) in use and in consumables cabinet have not exceeded expiration or use by date. Labels are legible.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Calibration

• 1 - Equipment used to assemble, test evaluate and accept products has not exceeded the calibration due date. The calibration past due date will be month-end e.g. due 9/4/15 is past due on 10/01/15. Register of due dates is maintained.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Calibration labels are legible e.g. torque wrenches, voltmeters, meggers, scopes, load cells.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Calibration of load cell used to verify tractor push force is valid.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Calibration of equipment to verify flow/leak rates is valid (Hydrotechnik).

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Lifting

• 1 - Cranes/hoists/jacks have load rating clearly marked on each side?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Cranes/hoists/jacks are being periodically inspected according to local client and/or regulatory requirements?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - Load ratings are legibly and permanently marked in a prominent location on all jacks by casting, stamping or other suitable means?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Only competent personnel permitted to use overhead cranes?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - Lifting accessories are being properly managed e.g. use of colour coding/tagging to identify status, damaged or 'out of cert' equipment and accessories are either destroyed or quarantined?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 6 - Slings/wire-ropes are certified and register is maintained showing inspection/re-cert due dates?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1 - Are o-rings/seals stored properly and within manufacturer's recommendation (i.e. black bag with exp. date displayed)?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2 - Ready boxes for offshore use are fit for purpose, contents protected, packaged, identified?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3 - ESD safe workstations are clean, neat and free of unnecessary static generating material (plastics, paper, foam, drink bottles, etc.).

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 4 - Electronics personnel using ESD lab coat?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 5 - ESD sensitive components and assemblies containing exposed PCBAs or ESD sensitive components must be stored or transported in sealed static shielded bags/ boxes.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 6 - ESD shelves of metal racks at a common potential and grounded with a chain that makes contact with an ESD conductive floor surface?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7 - All personnel handling ESD sensitive components / assemblies must only do so at ESD safe workstation using a functional / tested grounding system.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 8 - Completed assemblies are packaged as to prevent physical damage (e.g. connector caps, bubble wrap, etc.)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 9 - Electronics are stored in appropriately air-conditioned/dehumidified area.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 10 - Assemblies with threads are protected with thread protectors during storage/transportation.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 11 - Offshore baskets/toolracks are in good condition and offer adequate protection for tools

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 12 - Peli-cases used for transportation of equipment are in good order (clean, adequate foam protection, no loose parts, silica gel desiccant)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 13 - Hydraulic oil is appropriately stored, labelled

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 15 - Special tools called out in assembly procedures are available

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 14 - Test equipment (test booth, fixtures, oil bath etc) are in good condition

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

• 2

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

• 3

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

• 4

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

• 5

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

• Management representative present during inspection

  Sign

• Auditor's signature

  Sign