Title Page

  • Site conducted

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Location

Untitled Page

  • EVALUATION OF TRAINING PROGRAMMES AS PART OF THE CONTRACTOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

  • Contractor:

  • Grower Company:

  • Name of Course:

  • Training Provider:

  • Name of Facilitator:

  • Date of course:

  • Date Attended:

  • Venue of Training:

  • What were the training objectives of the training intervention? (The Assessor evaluates the effectiveness of training meeting the objectives)

  • Training objective identified according to material from training provider

  • Unit Standard Alignment

  • Achieved/Not achieved/Covered in training

  • Training objective identified according to material from training provider

  • Units std

  • SO & AC

  • Rating Scale

  • Section 1: Learner Requirements

  • Area

  • Rating

  • Time Management

  • Did the training start on time

  • Were the learners in readiness before the training commenced

Venue

  • The venue for the training was conducive to the learning environment

Learner Attendance and participation

  • For poor attendance, give reasons

Section 2: Training provider requirements

  • Time Management

  • Was the training provider on time

  • Are regular intervals given to the learners as mini breaks?

  • A lunch break was given to the learner

Facilitator

  • the facilitator has the ability to transfer knowledge, skills and attributes to the learners through his/her teaching methods

  • the facilitator is a very knowledgeable on the subject

  • the facilitator took the learners needs into consideration

Training material

  • The content of the training material was relevant i.e. The learning offering

  • Handouts and training manuals were clear

  • Training Delivery Platform - The trainer used various methods, tools, training solutions and technologies in the of delivery of training

Assessment

  • Assessment was conducted

  • Evidence of an Assessment Plan

  • Assessment was done against the unit standard. Supply title and No of SAQA unit standard

  • Were formative assessments done throughout the training?

  • What methods of assessment concluded the summative assessment?

  • Did learners achieve a competency declaration/result?

  • Are you satisfied that the assessment was done correctly?

  • Development Areas identified to improve future training interventions and other comments

  • Learning Programmes must be void of substantial deficiencies in terms of learning effectiveness. This process is a systematic review against mistakes and blind spots

  • Development Areas identified to improve future training interventions and other comments

Section 3: Stop think before you act implication by Facilitator

  • Training Classification

  • Operators

  • Silviculture

  • Harvesting

  • Refer below for Drivers

  • Signals used when driving forward and reversing:

  • Conductor material when driving forward and reversing:

  • Blind spots are covered:

  • Planning routes:

  • Warning signals using sound:

  • Were the participants satisfied with the programme? Did the participants acquire the knowledge, understanding, skills and attitudes that the programme was designed to develop?

  • In the opinion of the Evaluator, are there any opportunities for future programmes to be improved?

  • Evaluator’s name:

  • Evaluator’s signature:

  • Date:

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.