Title Page
-
Site conducted
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
Untitled Page
-
EVALUATION OF TRAINING PROGRAMMES AS PART OF THE CONTRACTOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
-
Contractor:
-
Grower Company:
-
Name of Course:
-
Training Provider:
-
Name of Facilitator:
-
Date of course:
-
Date Attended:
-
Venue of Training:
-
What were the training objectives of the training intervention? (The Assessor evaluates the effectiveness of training meeting the objectives)
-
Training objective identified according to material from training provider
-
Unit Standard Alignment
-
Achieved/Not achieved/Covered in training
-
Training objective identified according to material from training provider
-
Units std
-
SO & AC
-
Rating Scale
-
Section 1: Learner Requirements
-
Area
-
Rating
-
Time Management
-
Did the training start on time
-
Were the learners in readiness before the training commenced
Venue
-
The venue for the training was conducive to the learning environment
Learner Attendance and participation
-
For poor attendance, give reasons
Section 2: Training provider requirements
-
Time Management
-
Was the training provider on time
-
Are regular intervals given to the learners as mini breaks?
-
A lunch break was given to the learner
Facilitator
-
the facilitator has the ability to transfer knowledge, skills and attributes to the learners through his/her teaching methods
-
the facilitator is a very knowledgeable on the subject
-
the facilitator took the learners needs into consideration
Training material
-
The content of the training material was relevant i.e. The learning offering
-
Handouts and training manuals were clear
-
Training Delivery Platform - The trainer used various methods, tools, training solutions and technologies in the of delivery of training
Assessment
-
Assessment was conducted
-
Evidence of an Assessment Plan
-
Assessment was done against the unit standard. Supply title and No of SAQA unit standard
-
Were formative assessments done throughout the training?
-
What methods of assessment concluded the summative assessment?
-
Did learners achieve a competency declaration/result?
-
Are you satisfied that the assessment was done correctly?
-
Development Areas identified to improve future training interventions and other comments
-
Learning Programmes must be void of substantial deficiencies in terms of learning effectiveness. This process is a systematic review against mistakes and blind spots
-
Development Areas identified to improve future training interventions and other comments
Section 3: Stop think before you act implication by Facilitator
-
Training Classification
-
Operators
-
Silviculture
-
Harvesting
-
Refer below for Drivers
-
Signals used when driving forward and reversing:
-
Conductor material when driving forward and reversing:
-
Blind spots are covered:
-
Planning routes:
-
Warning signals using sound:
-
Were the participants satisfied with the programme? Did the participants acquire the knowledge, understanding, skills and attitudes that the programme was designed to develop?
-
In the opinion of the Evaluator, are there any opportunities for future programmes to be improved?
-
Evaluator’s name:
-
Evaluator’s signature:
-
Date: