TOOLBOXES

• Document No.

• Audit Title

• Client / Site

• Conducted on

  Date

• Prepared by

• Location
  Address

• Personnel

• Corridor

  Telarah-Acacia Ridge Corridor

  Sydney-Craigieburn Corridor

  Kalgoorlie-Cootamundra Corridor

  Melbourne-Crystal Brook Corridor

Structure/Content

• Poor: No Structure, poor content.
  Fair: Some structure, not consistent
  Good: Consistent Structure
  Best Practice: Content Structure with excellent content

• How would you describe structure/content of the toolbox.

  Poor

  Fair

  Good

  Best Practice

Engagement

• Poor - No follow up, no minutes produced.
  Fair - Some follow up on actions, and minutes produced.
  Good Minutes produced and all actions followed up in timely manner
  Best practice - As ‘Good’ high level of minutes and actions followed up and communicated back to team in timely manner.
  

• How would you describe the engagement?

  Poor

  Fair

  Good

  Best Practice

Toolbox outcomes

• Poor - No follow up, no minutes produced.
  Fair - Some follow up on actions, and minutes produced.
  Good - Minutes produced and all actions followed up in timely manner
  Best practice - As ‘Good’ high level of minutes and actions followed up and communicated back to team in timely manner.
  
  
  

• How would you describe the Toolbox outcomes?

  Poor

  Fair

  Good

  Best Practice

Leadership

• Poor - Little or no direction given to group – poor planning.
  Fair - Some planning, structure and direction given.
  Good - Well prepared toolbox with strong delivery and team engagement
  Best Practice - As ‘Good’. Preparation and delivery excellent, creating an open and honest forum.

• How would you describe the leadership?

  Poor

  Fair

  Good

  Best Practice