Title Page

  • Audit date :

  • Audit reference :

  • Auditor :

  • Auditee :

Mandatory Audit Questions

  • Are procedures being audited meeting the requirements of the where applicable e.g., ISO 9001:2015 and customer-specific codes of practise?

  • Are documents accessible and readily available on the master register?

  • Are documents in use the correct revisions?

  • Have the relevant staff been trained on these documents?

  • Are training records up-to-date with the current documents?

  • Previous Audit Reviewed?

  • Any NC Raised in Previous Audit Closed?

Audit Specific Questions

  • Does the organisation seek to continually improve & enhance customer requirements and customer satisfaction – how is this achieved

  • Evidence :

  • Does the organisation have a system in place to improve products and services to meet requirements – e.g investing in latest technology and innovation, improving reliability, improving yield, reducing cost, and improving on-time delivery

  • Evidence :

  • Improving the performance and effectiveness of the QMS by acting on process performance results,

  • Evidence :

  • Is there evidence that quality system documentation is revised & updated

  • Evidence :

  • Have any changes occurred in the production process since last audit & is there evidence that documentation has been updated & implemented

  • Evidence :

  • Is data used to develop improvement opportunities

  • Evidence :

  • Does the organisation monitor underperformance of the management system

  • Evidence :

  • Is data analysis and evaluation used to identify continuous improvement & improve the performance and effectiveness of the QMS

  • Evidence :

  • Are improvement systems planned

  • Evidence :

  • Does the organisation measure the effectiveness of processes / QMS improvements

  • Evidence :

  • Does it in turn improve the organization’s overall performance, efficiency, and effectiveness

  • Evidence :

  • Are changes documented properly according to the documentation requirements.

  • Evidence :

  • Where improvements are affected reactively through corrective actions is improvement realized

  • Evidence :

  • Is root cause analysis used in correcting, preventing or reducing undesired effects

  • Evidence :

  • Is there evidence that the organisation acts on customer feedback and/or in service reports

  • Evidence :

  • Are audit findings reviewed & understood

  • Evidence :

  • Is there a document procedure for managing non-conforming products

  • Evidence :

  • Does the procedure include the requirement for staff to identify & report potentially non-conforming product

  • Evidence :

  • Is there clear identification of non-conforming product

  • Evidence :

  • Are defined responsibilities for making final decisions on use, reworking, use by concession etc at the appropriate level

  • Evidence :

  • Are records available showing decisions made

  • Evidence :

  • Is there a document procedure for the handling & correcting identified failures

  • Evidence :

  • Is there clear documentation of the non-conformity

  • Evidence :

  • Is immediate action [correction] taken to eliminate a detected nonconformity or defect taken

  • Evidence :

  • Does root-cause address the nonconformity

  • Evidence :

  • Is there evidence that the action relates to the address the identified root-cause

  • Evidence :

  • Has responsibility for the necessary action been identified

  • Evidence :

  • Is appropriate timescale for corrective action determined

  • Evidence :

  • Is there evidence that the proposed action was actually implemented

  • Evidence :

  • Is there evidence that the action was effective in preventing recurrence of the problem

  • Evidence :

  • Is there evidence that the necessary systems, policies, practices and procedures to prevent recurrence were updated & retraining completed

  • Evidence :

  • Does the organisation monitor effectiveness of corrective actions

  • Evidence :

  • Do management review meetings attended by senior management include review of incidents, corrective actions & non-conforming materials

  • Evidence :

Opportunity For Improvement

  • Number of OFI raised :

  • Details

  • Have the OFI details been added to HubSpot

Non-conformance

  • Number of Non-conformances raised :

  • Details

  • Have the Non-conformance details been added to HubSpot

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.