Title Page

  • Where is the site`
  • What is the site`

  • RCA

  • Suburb

  • Road name

  • Activity Description

  • TTM Contractor

  • TTM level

  • CAR / WAP number

  • WTA Works

  • Date / Time

  • Prepared by

  • Type of Audit/ Review Undertaken

OPERATIONAL DETAILS

  • TTM method

  • Contractor - working space

  • Client / Principal

SIGNS

  • A1 Missing Signs 5 points per sign

  • A2 Position 2 points per sign

  • A3 Not visible / fallen over 5 points per sign

  • A4 Wrong sign 5 points per sign

  • A5 Condition unacceptable 4 points per sign

  • A6 Permanent sign 5 points per sign

  • A7 Unapproved sign used / too small 4 points per sign

  • A8 Non-compliant support / sign too low 2 points per sign

MOBILE & SEMI STATIC

  • B1 Tail pilot vehicle / AWVMS omitted or incorrect location <br>30 Points

  • B2 Lead pilot vehicle omitted or incorrect location <br>20 Points

  • B3 Shadow vehicle omitted or incorrect location <br>26 Points

  • B4 TMA missing or non compliant<br>26 Points

  • B5 AWVMS / arrowboard non compliant<br>26 Points

PEDESTRIANS / CYCLISTS

  • C1 Inadequate provision for pedestrians <br>10 Points

  • C2 Inadequate provision for cyclists <br>10 Points

DELINEATION

  • D1 Missing or ineffective taper – leading taper (including chicane) <br>26 Points

  • D2 Tapers too short – leading taper <br>15 points

  • D3 Taper too short or missing – trailing taper<br>5 Points

  • D4 Spacing in taper <br>5 points

  • D5 Spacing along lanes <br>3 points

  • D6 Missing or ineffective delineation along lanes <br>10 Points

  • D7 Condition unacceptable 2 Points each

  • D8 Using non-approved device 4 Points

  • D9 Road marking incorrect at long term level 2 or 3 roads <br>30 Points

  • D10 Inadequate / missing site access <br>10 points

MISCELLANEOUS

  • E1 Working in live lanes 20 points per breach

  • E2 Missing or ineffective controller 20 points per event

  • E3 Safety zone compromised 10 points per breach

  • E4 High visibility garment not acceptable 5 points each

  • E5 Marginal surface condition (carriageway only) <br>15 points each

  • E6 Unacceptable surface condition (peds, cyclists or carriageway) <br>30 points

  • E7 Barrier defects (missing or Incorrect components) <br>10 points each

  • E8 Unsafe or redundant TTM 5 points each

  • E9 VMS message incorrect or inappropriate <br>15 points

  • E10 Flashing beacons / indicator lights not used or ineffective <br>3 points

  • E11 Parking / stopping features not relocated 5 points each

  • E12 Unsafe and illegal parking of plant / equipment <br>20 points

  • E13 Marginal items (signs, delineators, Hi vis garments) 1 point each

OTHER WORKSITE ASPECTS

  • G1 QUALIFIED PERSON ON SITE [REFER TO A5 OF COPTTM] <br><br>

  • GOOD SITE INDUCTION? [DOES NOT AFFECT SCORE]<br>

  • G2 TSL APPROPRIATE [REFER TO C4 OF COPTTM] <br><br>

  • G3 ROAD USER FLOW ACCEPTABLE <br><br>

  • G4 ON-SITE RECORD [FORM MUST INCLUDE STMS AUTHORITY, 2 HOURLY CHECKS AND TSL DETAILS] <br><br>

  • G5 TMP APPROVED?<br><br>

  • TMP Type?

  • G6 APPROVED TMP SIGHTED? <br><br>

  • G7 APPROVED TMP APPLICABLE? <br><br>

  • G8 TTM IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED TMP? <br><br>

ACTIONS PLANNED BY STMS

  • SITE FIXED? <br><br>When a review identifies an unacceptable and / or dangerous site did the STMS cease the activity and go about making corrections in a timely manner to bring the site up to an acceptable standard prior to recommencing works? If No, a Stops Works Order will be considered. Note: Not all situations will require the physical works to be stopped while corrections are made to the TTM. Physical works must stop if they are contributing to the hazards identified. Consideration should be given to whether ceasing the works will create a greater hazard or the site will become more unsafe if the works stop. Consideration should also be given if corrections can be done in a timely manner and whether there is the ability to make the corrections or whether another party would be required to assist with the corrections.

SITE ACTIVITY CEASED BY

  • If the site activity has been ceased, indicate who directed that the work to cease.

  • Select STMS

KEY POINTS / AUDIT RESULTS

  • Auditor/Reviewer notes areas identified in the review including both good aspects and areas for improvement.

  • COMPLAINT CALLOUT? <br>Has the audit been triggered by a complaint?

  • SITE ACTIVITY STATUS <br>Is the site Attended or Unattended?

  • AUDIT/ REVIEW PLANNED / UNPLANNED?<br>Was this audit/review planned or unplanned (as in did you discover this site by chance or did you know it was here)? <br>

  • NOTIFICATIONS (RCA) [DOES NOT AFFECT SCORE] <br>Evidence available of notification of work programme to RCA for TMP implementation, organisation responsible for traffic signals when affected, Public Transport for bus stop relocations. <br>

  • Has the RCA been notified of the intended dates and times of implementation and the STMS responsible?

  • Where applicable have public transport agencies been advised of any impact to bus routes, bus stops or bus parking locations?

  • Where traffic signals may be affected has the organisation responsible for the signals been notified of the intent to work near traffic signals?<br>Evidence available of notification of work programme to RCA for TMP implementation, organisation responsible for traffic signals when affected, Public Transport for bus stop relocations.

  • TMP DESIGN ISSUES? <br><br>Record issues relating to the TMP design or approval in key points field. These issues do not need to be addressed with the onsite STMS or delegate. These issues will need to be followed up after the audit with the designer or approver of the TMP.

  • If yes, record issues in key points below

  • Record issues relating to the TMP design or approval in key points field. These issues do not need to be addressed with the onsite STMS or delegate. These issues will need to be followed up after the audit with the designer or approver of the TMP.

ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN

  • Auditor/Reviewer notes actions to be taken to improve the condition and/or operation of the site. Where a site is identified as dangerous this must include areas that must be addressed prior to activities re-commencing. Corrections should be communicated and agreed between the relevant parties and recorded on the form so there is a clear understanding of any requirements, including timeframes for the various changes required and who is responsible for the changes.

AUDITOR / REVIEWER TO COMPLETE

  • Auditor / Reviewer name:

  • Auditor / Reviewer qualification NZTA ID No.

  • Auditor / Reviewer mobile number:

  • In submitting this form, the auditor / reviewer specified above agrees that they have explained the significant issues and proposed remedies to the relevant parties specified above and have handed these parties a physical copy of the audit (does not apply for unattended sites).

STMS TO COMPLETE

  • Received by / Signed

FINAL SCORE

  • RATINGS

Score

  • Final score

  • Is the score due to safety concerns

Site Photos

  • Add media

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.