WHS tender assessment

• Contractor/Region

• Company Name

• Contractor ID

• Conducted on

  Date

• Prepared by

• Location
  Address

1.0 Administration

• 1.1 Does the information supplied have a WHS policy that has a clear goal and management commitment ?<br>

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1.2 Is the document in a format that easy to read and interpret ?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 1.3 Does the plan appear to be set out in a logical sequence ?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

2.0 Risk Management

• 2.1 Does the information supplied have a method of identifying, assessing and controlling risk or hazards ?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 2.2 Does the plan address high risk activities and require a SWMS should any be foreseen ?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

3.0 Responsibility and accountability ?

• 3.1 Does the organisation have a clear direction of management representation in the plan ?

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

4.0 Traning and Induction

• 4.1 Does the organisation have a method of identifying training needs in relation to the work being undertaken ?

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

• 4.2 Does the organisation have a clear induction process ensuring the inductee has a construction induction card ?

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

5.0 Consultation and reporting

• 5.1 Does the organisation have a consultation process (Toolbox talks or similar) ?<br>

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

• 5.2 Does the plan address regulatory requirements ni relation to notifiable incidents?

  Safe

  At Risk

  N/A

6.0 Emergency management

• 6.1 Does the company have a emergency response plan ?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Outcome

• Comments and Corrective Actions Required

• Result of Audit

  Select Deemed Compliant Require Further Documentation Deemed Non-Compliant

  • Deemed Compliant
  • Require Further Documentation
  • Deemed Non-Compliant

• Signature of Reviewer

  Sign

• Date & Time

  Date