Z Project Review - Fusion Safety Management Copy

• Document No.

• Audit Title

• Client / Site

• Conducted on

  Date

• Prepared by

• Location
  Address

• Contact point on site:

• 1.0 Scope of the review: The site review was to determine the quality of implementation some of the company’s safety management system elements by Zauner Staff.A field review was also carried out to identify any immediate hazards that may impact the safety on the project. At the end of the review a verbal feedback session was completed with the construction team, which included the discussion of the field observations and the adequacy of some of the management systems and controls.

• Select date

  Date

1.0 Project Status

• What is the current phase of the project? ( Is the project on schedule? What are the working hours? how many workers? )

2.0 Positive Items Identified during review: While much of this report detail areas that require improvement, it should be noted that there were a number of possitive observations identified during the review. Positive observations included the following:

3.0 Safety Management System (Implementation): Please note that this is not an exhaustive review of the implementation of the Zauner Safety Management System elements at the project, but a snap shot of some SMS elements that may impact project team performance.

• 3.1 Project Safety Checklist: Each Zauner project is required to produce a project safety checklist. The checklist is an overview of the project, including scope and critical items to be addressed throughout the project. Part of the Project Safety Checklist involves the formation of a series of action items to be completed and tracked. Was the project checklist available and were the actions items identified in the checklist being tracked?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 3.2 Key Performance Indications: Key performance indicators are identified in the plan and are a good tool to determine if the site is proactively on track with their program. Both leading and lagging indicators have been identified in the plan. Were the KPI's available for the project?, were they being tracked?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 3.3 Roles and responsibilities – Are there are specific roles and responsibilities under the SMS for the project , is it clear as to who within the project team is responsible for what activity on the project?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 3.4a - Hazard Inspections: - There is a requirement for hazard inspections to be completed both daily and on a weekly basis by the SSO. Is this being completed sufficently?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 3.4b. Do the items identified in the last 3 inspections completed, represent what is currently occuring on site during the field review?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 3.4c Is sufficient information included on the corrective actions register?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 3.5a - Safe Work Method Statements: Are SWMS available for work? (Check at least 2 activities)

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 3.5b - Is there evidence of the Zauner team carrying out a review of the SWMS prior to work commencing?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

4.0 - Field Observations:

• 4.1 Perimeter fencing - Is the perimeter fencing in good condition, are there areas that people (children) can gain access to the project? Has the team set up the fencing with “construction site no access” signage around the hoarding ?<br>

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.2 Site Offices - Are the site offices appropriately located? is there a sign in book for contractors? is there sufficient rest area/ toilet facilities?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.3 Traffic Management Plan - Is there a clear traffic management plan for the project?, is there appropriate controls to separate workers from construction vehicles?; are there appropriate controls to protect the public from Construction Traffic?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.4 Project Access layout: Are the common routes through the project appropriate for worker acess and clear of hazards?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.5 Access and Egress: Is there appropriate access and egress into and from buildings? Are the access point safely constructed?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.6 Emergency Response: Is there an emergency response plan for fire and medical? Is the emergency response plan egress and access on the project sufficient? is emergency signage appropriate?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.7 Materials Management: Are the materials used for construction as well as construction equipment appropriately stored?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.8 Housekeeping : Is the housekeeping on the project sufficient? (Removal of unwanted construction material from the working areas; exit routes clear; )

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.9 Waste removal: - Is the material in the waste removal (Skip) bins stored appropriately? (is it being removed from the project quick enough or is material backing up?)

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.10 Equipment Inspections - There is a requirement to carryout inspections for all plant on site, is the team are carrying out these inspections by checking plant and equipment on the project?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.11 Hot Work: Is is there any hot work on the project, and is the work being carried out appropriately?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.12 Fall Hazards: Are all areas that have the potential for falls, sufficiently protected? (Top rail, mid rail, kick kickplate)

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.13 Fall protection Equipment: Is fall protection equipment being used appropriately?<br>

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.14 Ladder and Platform use: Are ladders and platforms being used appropriately on the project?<br>

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.15 Scaffolding: Is scaffolding appropriately constructed ? (Firm foundation; fully planked; appropriate access; kickplate; midrail; toprail)

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.16 Falling objects: Is there a risk of falling objects on the project and is it being appropriately managed?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.17 Electrical Hazards: - Are the electrical hazards on the project sufficiently controlled?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.18 Cable Management: - Are electrical cables appropriately managed? (kept out of the way from potential damage)

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.19 - Hazardous Substances :- Are there any hazardous substances and are they appropriately stored? are the MSDS available?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.20 Hard Hat: - Are workers and management using hard hats appropriately on the project?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.21 Face / Eye Protection: - Are workers and management using face and eye protection on the project appropriately?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.22 High Vis Vest:- Are workers and management using high visibility vests on the project appropriately?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.23 Footwear:- Are workers and management using appropriate footwear on the project, hard toed shoes?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.24 Asbestos:- If there is asbestos is it being handled appropriately?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.25 Confined Spaces:- If there is confined spaces, and are they being handled appropriately?

  Yes

  No

  Not reviewed

• 4.27 Were there any other hazards identified during the survey?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Add signature

  Sign