Title Page
-
Site conducted
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
Loss of Separation (Airprox)
T - Conflicting Military and/or Non-radio Traffic
-
Avoid active military route / areas
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Military Activity Areas
-
Use of TCAS by Military
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Military participation and compliance with Delta Ops Procedures
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Conflicting civil traffic compliance with Delta Operators Procedures
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Lack of awareness of changes to Delta Ops
-
Eastwind Aviation attends Delta Ops meetings
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Delta Ops - Communication Plan
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew detects conflicting military aircraft through Visual Obs or RT SA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Military Combat Operations
-
VMC ops only
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Safety Stand-down - All aircraft Land / RTB
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Active transponder on conflicting 'non radio' traffic
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew detects incorrect position of other aircraft through TCAS derived SA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Conflicting Commercial Traffic
-
Positive Radar Identification (at LOS and DNPO (PH Int'l))
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
No Positive Radar Identification (Below 1500') (at Warri and other Delta areas)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Airworks Advisory Information - Southern Sector & Delta
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Conflicting civil traffic compliance with Delta Operators Procedures
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Lack of awareness of changes to Delta Ops
-
Eastwind Aviation attends Delta Ops meetings
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Delta Ops - Communication Plan
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew detects conflicting aircraft through Visual Obs or RT SA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew detects incorrect position of other aircraft through TCAS derived SA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Loss of SA
-
Flight Crew clear understanding of existing procedures in the area
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Lack of awareness of existing procedures
-
Route / Area Line Training
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew adhere to sterile cockpit SOPs
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew have a correct shared mental picture via approach briefing
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Inappropriate use of automation
-
FCOM / OEM Derived Automation Policy
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Training in 'Use of Automation'
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Conflicting civil traffic compliance with Delta Operators Procedures
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight crew detects conflicting aircraft through Visual Obs or RT SA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight crew detects incorrect position of other aircraft through TCAS derived SA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Incorrect or misunderstood ATC instructions
-
ATC issuing understandable instructions using standard phraseology
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Comprehension and understanding
-
Use and understanding of English
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Routinely copying down key ATC instructions
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight crew use of CRM to confirm shared mental picture
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew request clarification from ATC
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
ATC detecting and recognising an error during read-back
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
ATC/ Airworks/ HLO detecting and recognising conflicting traffic; which is not following advice.
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flt Crew maintains traffic SA and challenge ATC /HLO
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Flight Crew do not correctly manage aircraft to maintain clearance
-
Flight Crew accurately enter clearance/ instructions into FMS/ instrumentation
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Flight Crew errors during data input
-
Aircraft Systems - Design highlights errors/ differences
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew detect, recognise and correct error via crosscheck SOPs
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Use of fully updated NAV data
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Managing and Monitoring Flight Path
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Degraded flight crew monitoring due to complacency, distraction or fatigue
-
Monitoring & Communications skills included in CRM
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight & Duty Time Limitations
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Adherence to SOPs that define monitoring roles and callouts
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew adherence to sterile cockpit SOPs
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
E - Inappropriate manual handling of aircraft
-
FCOM or OEM based automation policy for appropriate use of manual handling
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
ATC/ Airworks/ HLO detecting and recognising conflicting traffic; which is not following advice.
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
T - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service
-
See - Continuing Airworthiness / MCM - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service BowTie
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
See - Maintenance / AMO PM - Release of an Unairworthy Aircraft to Service BowTie
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
Section Break - Top Event - Loss of Separation (Airprox)
C - Ineffective BowTie / HRM
-
QA Mgnt System - Threat Line Audit
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
C - Mid-air Collision
-
HLO/ATC recognise the incursion and issues avoiding action
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew of both aircraft receiving TCAS RA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew responds appropriately to instructions and/ or TCAS RA
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Flight Crew of either aircraft detects and recognizes the conflict and takes emergency avoiding action
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
C - Abrupt avoidance manoeuvre resulting in injuries
-
Flight Crew responds appropriately to LoCI (above)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Aircraft protection systems limit certain manoeuvres (e.g.TQ_limiter)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Cabin secured for flight by SOPs
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link
-
Cabin design features to minimise injuries (e.g FAK strapped down)
- Good
- Fair
- Marginal
- Poor
- Accountable
- Document Link