INTRODUCTION
-
CLIENT FILE REVIEWS
-
PERIOD
- P1801
- P1802
- P1803
- P1804
-
NAME OF FSP:
-
FSP no. (PREFIX WITH "FSP")
-
Conducted on:
-
This report was prepared by
-
- Simply Comply (Pty) Ltd
- Gerard Schiel
- Bianca Engelbrecht / D Julyan
- Gaylene Crous
-
Location
-
PRESENT:
File Reviews and Audits
TYPE OF FSP
-
CLIENT CORRESPONDENCE AND FILES AUDITED: PERIOD:
- P1801
- P1802
- P1803
- P1804
-
This FSP is licenced as a:
- Motor Dealership
- Brokerage - ST
- Brokerage - Investment
- Brokerage - Risk
- UMA
- Cell captive
- Call Centre - outbound
- Call Centre - Inbound
- Pro- Banker
- CAT II
-
Only intermediary services, and no advice is provided
-
A documented, correct service level agreement is in place between:<br>1. Product supplier and FSP<br>2. Brokerage and FSP (where applicable)
-
It is incumbent on the FSP to ensure that there are adequate drafted service level agreements - as these are the basis on which service can be measured from a TCF perspective. Please ensure this is attended to a.s.a.p.
-
Administrative procedures are in place, to ensure proper process, checks and balances and controls. Deviations are noted and addressed
-
Notes:
Files Audited:
-
DATE OF AUDIT
-
Name of Client
-
Disclosures correct
-
Services provided within the agreed SLA
-
Correspondence clear, correct and complete
-
The product performs as it has been led to perform (TCF Pillar 5)
-
NOTES:
-
PHOTO EVIDENCE
-
Add media
-
FILE AUDITS
FILE AUDITS
-
DATE OF AUDIT
MOTOR DEALERSHIP
-
Name of Representative:
-
Transaction Date:
-
Name of client/file
-
A due diligence has been completed on products and product providers recommended
-
Date the representative last received product training on the recommended product
-
Offer to Purchase - on file and correct and complete
-
Invoice - figures on invoice are the same as the OTP
-
Full Product and Fees disclosures - evident
-
Contract - Page 1 on file
-
Record of advice - correct updated version
-
Record of advice - complete, initialled every page
-
Cash deal / Cash deposit
-
FICA verification done
- ID - dated and verified
- ID - not dated or verified
- No proof of ID
- Proof of address - dated and verified
- Proof of address - not dated or verified
- No Proof of address
- FICA risk rate document Complete
- No FICA risk rate document
- Juristic Entity - Resolution/ Proxy
- Juristic entity - No resolution/ Proxy
- Not all documents on file
- Source of Funds Proof on file
- No proof of source of funds
- Source of income (proof)
- No source of income (proof)
-
It is critical that the correct FICA verification and documents are on file. Please ensure that staff are retrained on this, and that the matter is attended to as priority.
-
Reportable transaction
- No
- Yes - threshold
- Yes - suspicious/ unusual
- Yes - terrorist related
- Reporting done
- Reporting not done - risk
-
All FICA reporting done within the required timeframes: 1) Threshold transaction - 2 days 2) Suspicious/ Unusual - 5 days 3) Terrorist financing - 15 days
- No
- Yes - threshold
- Yes - suspicious/ unusual
- Yes - terrorist related
- Reporting done
- Reporting not done - risk
-
Non-reporting of FICA reportable matters within the required timeframes, places the dealership at risk. Please ensure this matter is addressed as a priority as this is a material non-compliance which carries severe penalties.
-
Insurances on file
-
Drivers licence - correct, up to date, valid
-
Correspondence on file/ File Notes/
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Deal File compliant - all documents are complete, correct (including dates and signatures) - all transaction values match
-
Has a system been implemented which ensures regular product training. Describe.
-
Evidence of KI checking - monitoring
-
Notes/ Comments:
-
Files Audited for compliance
Files Audited
File Audits CAT I - SHORT TERM
-
DATE OF AUDIT
-
Name of Representative:
-
Date of Transaction:
-
Name of client/file
-
A due diligence has been completed on products and product providers recommended
-
Disclosure document - is this the correct, updated document
-
Consent to obtain information/ Schedule provided<br>
-
Is the transaction a comparison off an existing schedule only, a new quote completely, or a combination of schedule and advice/ assessing risk
-
Broker Appointment - on document/ application form or other
-
Full product and fees disclosures
-
Mandate/ Evidence of Instruction being provided by client
-
Information gathering in order for intermediary to perform analysis
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Evidence of analysis
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Quote signed and on record
-
Application form complete, with no blank areas (customer did not sign an incomplete form)
-
Claims History - (short term)
-
Record of advice - complete and copy provided to client.
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
RPAR - correct, complete, copy to client
-
Correspondence/ File notes/ Records of engagement
-
Evidence of KI checking/ assessing content, plus appropriateness
-
Has a system been implemented which ensures regular product training. Describe.
-
Notes/ Comments
-
Files Audited for compliance
Files Audited
File Audits CAT I
-
DATE OF AUDIT
-
Name of Representative:
-
Date of Transaction:
-
Name of client/file
-
A due has diligence been completed on products and product providers recommended
-
Consent to obtain information<br>
-
Disclosure document
-
Broker Appointment - on document/ application form or other
-
Mandate/ Evidence of Instruction being provided by client
-
Information gathering in order for intermediary to perform analysis
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Evidence of analysis and risk assessment
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Quote signed and on record
-
Application form complete, with no blank areas (customer did not sign an incomplete form)
-
FICA verification (verified ID/Proof of address/Source of funds) DATED?
- Not applicable
- ID - verified and dated
- ID - not verified/ dated
- Proof of address - verified
- Proof of address - not verified/dated
- FICA risk rate document - complete
- FICA risk rate document - not complete
- 2 year re-verification done
- 2 year re-verification not on file
- Additional risk requirements
- Additional risk requirements - not on file
-
FICA verification is signed and dated, and less than 2 years, with a process in place to re-verify at least once every 2 years:
-
Record of advice - complete and copy provided to client.
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Full product features, risks and fees disclosures confirmed
-
RPAR - correct, complete, copy to client
-
Correspondence/ File notes/ Records of engagement
-
Evidence of KI checking/ assessing content, plus appropriateness
-
Has a system been implemented which ensures regular product training. Describe.
-
Has a system of feedback from customers been implemented to identify any problematic areas?
-
Notes/ Comments
File Audits - CAT II
-
Files Audited for compliance
Files Audited
-
DATE OF AUDIT
-
Date of transaction:
-
Name of client/file
-
Disclosure document is correct and includes Section 13 certification?
-
Consent to obtain information<br>
-
Intermediary appointment on file
-
CAT II mandate on file, complete and signed
-
CAT II mandate is confirmed as the approved version
-
Was advice provided?
-
Is there a record of advice on file, in compliance with the requirements of a CAT I provider?
-
Information gathering in order for intermediary to perform analysis
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Evidence of analysis and risk assessment
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Is there evidence of assessing the customer's risk profile or motivating why a certain risk approach is undertaken
-
FICA verification (verified ID/Proof of address/Source of funds)
- Not applicable
- ID - verified and dated
- ID - not verified/ dated
- Proof of address - verified
- Proof of address - not verified/dated
- FICA risk rate document - complete
- FICA risk rate document - not complete
- 2 year re-verification done
- 2 year re-verification not on file
- Additional risk requirements
- Additional risk requirements - not on file
-
FICA verification is signed and dated, and less than 2 years, with a process in place to re-verify at least once every 2 years:
-
Reporting is done at least quarterly, in accordance with the Mandate
-
Correspondence/ File notes/ Records of engagement
- Complete and comprehensive
- Complete but requires more detail
- Not compliant and requires addressing and monitoring
- Not applicable - no analysis was required
- Evident from the record of advice/ engagement
- Existing client - ongoing analysis
-
Product due diligence complete
-
Describe the process of ensuring that the Mandate is complied with. If there are any breaches, provide details on what these were as well as how they were addressed
-
Has a system of feedback from customers been implemented to identify any problematic areas?
-
Notes/ Comments
SIGNATURE:
-
COMPLIANCE