HP 13 People & Plant Interface Site Inspection on Balfour Beatty Projects

The following joint site inspection was completed by DAWSON-WAM & Martello Piling for a presentation to the M3 Safety Committee. Inspection focused on "People & Plant Interface" on the M3 Junction 2 to 4a Project

• M3 Contractor & Project location:

• Location / GPS location available
  Address

• Site inspection completed by:

• Completed on:

  Date

• Permit No.

• Risk Assessment Ref.

• WPP / TBS Ref:

Task Description

Weather?

Interface with other contractors?

• Any interface with other contractors?

  Yes

  No

People & plant hierarchy of control

• Assessment of People & Plant Hierarchy of Control

  Select 1. Eliminate: People Plant Interface removed 2. Minimise: Full, physical segregation of people and plant 3. Minimise: Partial segregation of people and plant 4. Mitgate: No segregation of people and plant

  • 1. Eliminate: People Plant Interface removed
  • 2. Minimise: Full, physical segregation of people and plant
  • 3. Minimise: Partial segregation of people and plant
  • 4. Mitgate: No segregation of people and plant

People & Plant Interface Assessment

• In accordance with BB Golden Rules was a Daily Briefing offered by Site Supervisor?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In accordance with BB Golden Rules is the STOP BOARD Place?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In accordance with BB Golden Rules did the workforce get "thumbs" up before approaching or passing plant?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Based on Level 1 assessment is the interface removed, fenced off and plant operating without marshaling?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Based on Level 2 assessment are Plant Safe Zones established physically restricting people from entering the Red & Amber exclusion zones?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Based on Level 2 assessment is the exclusion zones marshalled?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Based on Level 3 assessment and above are cones, signs or spray used to denote zones?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Based on Level 3 assessment and above is there evidence of increased supervision or means of preventing unauthorised access?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In the event of an exceptional task (4. Mitigate RED) was there a robust site and task specific Safe System of Work?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In the event of an exceptional task (4. Mitigate RED) was there clear communication between plant operator or vehicle driver and essential personnel performing the task?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In the event of an exceptional task (4. Mitigate RED) was there a method of preventing non-authorised access?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In the event of an exceptional task (4. Mitigate RED) was there a full time Plant & Vehicle Marshal / Machine Controller in place?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In the event of an exceptional task (4. Mitigate RED) was there strict discipline in executing the task exactly as written?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Were the workforce aware of the ZERO TOLERANCE approach to People and Plant Interface?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Please complete your name and company below then sign

• 1.

  Sign

• 2.

  Sign

• 3.

  Sign

• 4.

  Sign

• 5.

  Sign

• 6.

  Sign

• 7.

  Sign

• 8.

  Sign

• 9.

  Sign

• 10.

  Sign

• 11.

  Sign

• 12

  Sign

• 13.

  Sign

• 14.

  Sign

• 15.

  Sign

• 16.

  Sign

• 17

  Sign

• 18

  Sign

• 19.

  Sign

• 20.

  Sign