Information
-
Standard being Audited
-
Process being Audited
-
Document Number
-
Conducted on
-
Location
-
Lead Auditor
-
Other Auditors
Previous Audit
-
a) Have all observations from previous internal audits been resolved and compliant?
-
Observation:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
Context of the Organisation
-
4.1 Have external and internal issues been determined that affect the ability of the process to achieve the intended results?
-
Observation:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
4.2 Have the requirements for the interested parties been identified?
-
Observation:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
4.3 Is the process defined?
-
Observation:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when:
-
Responsible Person:
-
4.4 Is the sequence and interaction of the process been defined?
-
Observation:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when:
-
Responsible Person:
Leadership
-
5.1 Have responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles been assigned, communicated and understood?
-
Observation:
-
Non-Conformance Details
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
Planning
-
6.1 Are safety hazards effectively managed and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
6.2 Are QMS risk and opportunities effectively managed and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
6.3 Are environmental risks and opportunities in relation to aspects and impacts, compliance obligations effectively managed and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
6.4 Have IMS objectives been established?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
Support
-
7.1 Has the resource, people, infrastructure and environment) needed for the operation and control of the process been provided and maintained?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
7.2 Is competency in relation to IMS effectively managed and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
7.3 Is IMS awareness effectively managed and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
7.4 Is communication effectively managed and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
7.5 Is 'documented information' managed effectively and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
7.6 Is documented information of external origin identified, controlled and managed effectively and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
Operation
-
8.1 Is the criteria for the process established?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
8.2 Is the process controlled in accordance with the criteria ?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
8.3 Is documented information retained to demonstrate the process has been carried out as planned?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
8.3 Are control of changes effectively managed and compliant including documented information?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
8.4 Are outsourced processes controlled and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
Performance Evaluation
-
9.1 Is performance evaluation effectively managed and compliant?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
9.2 Is management reviews effectively managed and compliant?<br>
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
Improvement
-
10.1 Is there evidence that opportunities for improvement have been determined and any necessary actions implemented?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
-
10.2 Is there evidence that non-conformities are being managed effectively including documented information?
-
Observations:
-
Non-Conformance Details:
-
Recommended Action:
-
By when?
-
Responsible Person:
Conclusion
-
Audit Summary Report
-
Corrective Actions
Audit Sign-off
-
Auditor
-
Auditee
Notes
Definitions
-
AUDIT - Systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine how well the audit criteria are fulfilled.
-
AUDITOR - Person who has undertaken a recognised Auditor's course either conducted internally or by a recognised External body, or person who possesses sufficient business experience and knowledge of AS/NZS ISO 9001, 14001 and/or 4801 to conduct an audit.
-
RECOMMENDED ACTION - Action to eliminate the cause of a detected non-conformity or other undesirable situation. In context of this audit, the meaning is to include action taken to rectify an identified deficiency (non-conformance or improvement opportunity), or action to prevent recurrence of a previous deficiency.
-
IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITY - Observations made which are provided as guidance on potential system improvement.
-
NON-CONFORMANCE - Non-fulfilment of a requirement. In the context of this audit checklist, the word "non-conformance" is used to describe conditions outside previously agreed, defined or specified requirements (including statutory requirements). It is a deficiency in documentation or procedures that reduces the quality of a material or service or introduces unacceptable risks to safety or the environment.
-
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) - In some circumstances, the question may not be applicable to the works being audited. In this instance, N/A can be recorded against the criteria and the question and points available removed from the audit scoring process.
-
MAJOR NON-CONFORMANCE - In auditing terminology a major non-conformance indicates the absence of a system or part of the system, or that the documented systems or procedures are not being followed. A major non-conformance can be where there is an obvious and potentially threatening system discrepancy likely to expose people, the environment, or the company to high or extreme risk. Non-conformances identified as the primary cause of a significant incident, or a warranted customer complaint, are considered major. A major non-conformance may require immediate rectification if there is a threat to the environment, equipment or the safety of people.
-
PREVENTATIVE ACTION - Action taken to prevent possible occurrence of potential deficiency / adverse impact to the quality, safety and environment.
-
SYSTEM - Consists of the following elements; policy, procedures, safe work procedures, safe work instructions, environmental instructions, forms, checklists, templates, plans and tools.
-
KEY:
C = Conformance
IO = Improvement Opportunity
NC = Non-conformance
Mj NC = Major Non-conformance -
SCORING SYSTEM:
Conformance (C) = 10 points
Improvement Opportunity (IO) = 5 points
Non-conformance (NC) = 0 points
Major non-conformance (MjNC) = -5 points