Information

  • Standard being Audited

  • Process being Audited

  • Document Number

  • Conducted on

  • Location
  • Lead Auditor

  • Other Auditors

Previous Audit

  • a) Have all observations from previous internal audits been resolved and compliant?

  • Observation:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

Context of the Organisation

  • 4.1 Have external and internal issues been determined that affect the ability of the process to achieve the intended results?

  • Observation:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 4.2 Have the requirements for the interested parties been identified?

  • Observation:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 4.3 Is the process defined?

  • Observation:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when:

  • Responsible Person:

  • 4.4 Is the sequence and interaction of the process been defined?

  • Observation:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when:

  • Responsible Person:

Leadership

  • 5.1 Have responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles been assigned, communicated and understood?

  • Observation:

  • Non-Conformance Details

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

Planning

  • 6.1 Are safety hazards effectively managed and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 6.2 Are QMS risk and opportunities effectively managed and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 6.3 Are environmental risks and opportunities in relation to aspects and impacts, compliance obligations effectively managed and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 6.4 Have IMS objectives been established?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

Support

  • 7.1 Has the resource, people, infrastructure and environment) needed for the operation and control of the process been provided and maintained?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 7.2 Is competency in relation to IMS effectively managed and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 7.3 Is IMS awareness effectively managed and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 7.4 Is communication effectively managed and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 7.5 Is 'documented information' managed effectively and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 7.6 Is documented information of external origin identified, controlled and managed effectively and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

Operation

  • 8.1 Is the criteria for the process established?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 8.2 Is the process controlled in accordance with the criteria ?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 8.3 Is documented information retained to demonstrate the process has been carried out as planned?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 8.3 Are control of changes effectively managed and compliant including documented information?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 8.4 Are outsourced processes controlled and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

Performance Evaluation

  • 9.1 Is performance evaluation effectively managed and compliant?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 9.2 Is management reviews effectively managed and compliant?<br>

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

Improvement

  • 10.1 Is there evidence that opportunities for improvement have been determined and any necessary actions implemented?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

  • 10.2 Is there evidence that non-conformities are being managed effectively including documented information?

  • Observations:

  • Non-Conformance Details:

  • Recommended Action:

  • By when?

  • Responsible Person:

Conclusion

  • Audit Summary Report

  • Corrective Actions

Audit Sign-off

  • Auditor

  • Auditee

Notes

Definitions

  • AUDIT - Systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine how well the audit criteria are fulfilled.

  • AUDITOR - Person who has undertaken a recognised Auditor's course either conducted internally or by a recognised External body, or person who possesses sufficient business experience and knowledge of AS/NZS ISO 9001, 14001 and/or 4801 to conduct an audit.

  • RECOMMENDED ACTION - Action to eliminate the cause of a detected non-conformity or other undesirable situation. In context of this audit, the meaning is to include action taken to rectify an identified deficiency (non-conformance or improvement opportunity), or action to prevent recurrence of a previous deficiency.

  • IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITY - Observations made which are provided as guidance on potential system improvement.

  • NON-CONFORMANCE - Non-fulfilment of a requirement. In the context of this audit checklist, the word "non-conformance" is used to describe conditions outside previously agreed, defined or specified requirements (including statutory requirements). It is a deficiency in documentation or procedures that reduces the quality of a material or service or introduces unacceptable risks to safety or the environment.

  • NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) - In some circumstances, the question may not be applicable to the works being audited. In this instance, N/A can be recorded against the criteria and the question and points available removed from the audit scoring process.

  • MAJOR NON-CONFORMANCE - In auditing terminology a major non-conformance indicates the absence of a system or part of the system, or that the documented systems or procedures are not being followed. A major non-conformance can be where there is an obvious and potentially threatening system discrepancy likely to expose people, the environment, or the company to high or extreme risk. Non-conformances identified as the primary cause of a significant incident, or a warranted customer complaint, are considered major. A major non-conformance may require immediate rectification if there is a threat to the environment, equipment or the safety of people.

  • PREVENTATIVE ACTION - Action taken to prevent possible occurrence of potential deficiency / adverse impact to the quality, safety and environment.

  • SYSTEM - Consists of the following elements; policy, procedures, safe work procedures, safe work instructions, environmental instructions, forms, checklists, templates, plans and tools.

  • KEY:
    C = Conformance
    IO = Improvement Opportunity
    NC = Non-conformance
    Mj NC = Major Non-conformance

  • SCORING SYSTEM:
    Conformance (C) = 10 points
    Improvement Opportunity (IO) = 5 points
    Non-conformance (NC) = 0 points
    Major non-conformance (MjNC) = -5 points

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.