Information
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Client / Site
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
-
Personnel
Definitions
5 Management Responsibility
-
Documented Procedure
-
Handwritten notes
-
5.1 (a) Has executive management established and documented a Quality policy?
-
5.1 (b) Have measurable Quality goals been established and measured to a baseline?
-
5.2 Have Management reviews taken place and include all required bullet points?<br>
-
Results of Internal Audits
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Opportunity for improvements
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Need for changes to Quality Management System.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
The level of qualification and Training of personnel.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Channels for communication to address and resolve all quality issues including customer complaints
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Process performance. Processes are the means, methods, practices that produce the product.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Performance measures monitor the effectiveness of those processes, for example detailing process errors, shipping delays, improper treatment of non conformances, AiSC audit corrective actions not closed in time, failure to conduct management reviews on time.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Product non conformance. Attributes of manufactured product ( in process and final ) that do not meet requirements
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Results from previous management reviews.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Output-resource needs
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
5.3 Has a Management Representative been appointed and does their duties include all of the bullet points?
-
5.4 Have adequate resources been provided which include personnel, buildings, workspace, equipment and utilities?
-
5.4.1 Minimum executive management team is Management Representative Detailing management Purchasing management Fabrication process management Quality assurance management Quality control management
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
5.4.2 Buildings, workspace and associated utilities
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
5.4.3 Fabrication Process Equipment
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
5.5 Have appropriate lines of communication regarding the effectiveness of the QMS been established?
-
5.6 Have the documentation requirements for an effective QMS been established, maintained and approved?
-
5.6.1 Bullet points: A quality Manual, statements of quality and objectives, procedures and their associated Quality Records (as required in 5.1)
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
5.6.2 Quality Manual-the fabricator shall have a quality manual that satisfies all of the standards as well as applicable reference documents.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
5.6.2.1 Organization- the Manual shall include a page showing current revision date, and the name and location of the fabricator. The Quality Manual shall include or reference documents that include:
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Policies and organizational descriptions
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Organizational chart describing responsibilities authority, and the interrelationship of functional positions
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Job Descriptions with authority and responsibility
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Qualifications evidence and biographies for individuals in key positions/functions
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
A Facility Plan
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
An Equipment List
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Established documented procedures
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
5.6.2.2 Approval- quality Manual signed and dated by the highest ranking individual responsibly for the facility.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
6. Contract and Project Specification Review and Communication.
-
6. Is there an approved documented procedure for contract and spec review?
-
6. Are there records for audit samples of these reviews?
-
Are records distributed to responsible individuals?
7. Detailing
-
Handwritten notes
-
7.1.1 Is there an approved documented procedure for preparation of shop & erection dwgs?
-
Does the procedure describe how projects are reviewed and incorporated?
-
Does the procedure describe how the fabricator coordinates, clarifies, resolves and tracks information with customers? RFIs?
-
7.1.1 Is there a effective RFI process in place?
-
7.1.2 Are detailing standards which include all bullet points of the standard being effectively utilized?<br>Preferred drawing layout:
-
Preferred methods of drawing layout:
-
Views?
-
Title Block Information?
-
Designation of shipping sequences?
-
Piece Marking System?
-
Dimensional Preferences?
-
Commonly Used Shop Abbreviations?
-
Showing bolt placement list (including bolt type and installation requirements)
-
Information required on weld symbols including any special NDT requirements
-
Fabricators preferred methods for:
-
Selection of connection geometry and material (including sizes and specifications)
-
Detailing holes, fasteners, washers, cuts, and copes
-
Assignment of appropriate welding symbols (shop and field welds)
-
Showing bolt type and installation method
-
Designating coating requirements (including coating materials and dry film thickness)
-
Showing any necessary special instructions to fabricate and erect structural steel frame
-
7.1.3.1 Does it identification of method to verify output of computer generated dwgs and or models?
-
7.1.3.1 Is there an approved documented procedure for Checking of shop & erection dwgs?
-
7.1.3.2 Is there a method used to document approval of shop drawings. (Stamps, signatures, logs,files or list may be used.
-
7.1.3.3 is there a documented procedure for customer supplied drawings defining the method if receipt, revision and control of those drawings.
-
7.2.1 Are required references maintained per section 3?<br>AISC Specifications, RCSC for bolting, AWS D1.1, AISC ASTM standards.
-
AISC Steel Construction Manual which includes AISC specification for steel buildings, RCSC, AISC specifications for steel buildings sand bridges
-
7.2.2.1 Has the responsibilities for detailing management been assigned to a qualified representative within the organization?
-
7.2.2.2 Are qualifications of personnel utilized for detailing and Checking verifiable?
-
7.2.2.3 Are qualifications of personnel utilized for connection design verifiable?
8. Document and Data Control (Review, Approval, Revision, Access, Obsolescence and Transmittal0
-
8. Is there an approved documented procedure for document and data control?
-
8.1 Are QMS documents reviewed for adequacy and approved by the appropriate level of authority?
-
8.2 Are customer requirement revisions controled and distributed to necessary departments?
-
8.3 Is there a revision control process for QMS documents?
-
8.4 Do personnel have access to relevant and current procedures and policies?
-
8.5 Is there an effective method established to prevent inadvertent use of obsolescent controlled documents?
-
8.5 Is there a transmittal system established for controlled documents?
9. Control of Quality Records - (Identification, Collection, Storage, Retrieval, Maintenance, Retention, Disposition)
-
9. Is there an approved documented procedure for the control of Quality records?
-
9.1 Are retention times recorded and maintained?
-
9.2 Are Quality records made available?
10. Purchasing
-
10. Is there an approved documented procedure for purchasing?
-
10.1 Is purchasing data clearly described on PO documents?
-
10.2 is there an selection and evaluation process and is there a procedure and records maintained?
-
10.2.1 Do fabrication subcontractors have the required certification?
-
10.2.2 Are detailing subcontractors evaluated and is this process defined and records maintained? Initial and ongoing evaluation.
-
10.3 Is verification of purchased items under control and are records maintained as required by procedure?
-
10.4 Are customers given access to verification of fabricated items?
-
10.5 Is there a procedure for customer supplied material and is it being followed?
11. Material Identification
-
11. Is there an approved documented procedure for material identification? Per AISC COSP and is it being followed?
-
11. Are processes and records maintained Per AISC COSP (is there a process i place to verify MTR prior to first fabrication process taking place?)
12. Fabrication process control
-
12. Are there approved procedures in place for fabrication processes including "special processes" done at the facility?<br>Page 11 of AISC 201-06.
-
Thermal and metal cutting.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Fitting and assembly
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Welding
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Drilling
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Bolting
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Milling
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
Coating.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
"Special procedures" for cambering.
- Strength
- OK
- Opportunity for Improvement
- Area of Concern
- Corrective Action
- Not Applicable
-
12.1 is there an approved welding procedure in place that includes records of:<br>WPS (per code)<br>Preheat<br>PQR (where req)<br>WQTR<br>Welder POE
-
WPS - Welding procedure specification per applicable code(s)
-
Pre-heat / post heat requirements
-
PQR-where required
-
WQTR-welder qualification test records
-
WPQR POE welder performance qualification records, evidence that the period of effectiveness has not expired (continuity)
-
12.2 Bolt installation
-
12.2 Is there an approved documented procedure for bolt installation which includes the fabricators Pre installation verification testing preferred method for pretensioned and slip critical joints?
-
12.3 Is there an approved procedure and process in place and being followed for material preparations or to application of coatings?
-
12.4 Is there an approved procedure and process in place and being followed for coating application?
-
12.5 Is there an approved procedure and process in place and being followed for equipment maintenance, including preventive maintenance?
-
SPE 12 application records?
13. Inspection and testing
-
<br>13. Are there approved procedures and processes in place and being followed, including sampling plans, for inspection?
-
13.1 Have qualified personnel been assigned inspection duties?
-
13.2.1 Is receiving inspection carried out? are there indications of this process?
-
13.2.2 Are there appropriate in-process inspections carried out? are there indications of this process?
-
13.2.3 Is appropriate final inspections carried out? are they documeted?
-
13.2.4 Are records and methods for recording final inspection and are they verifiable?
14 Calibration of inspection and test equipment
-
14. Are there approved procedures in place for calibration of inspection and test equipment?
-
14. Does the process and records indicate all of the bullet points required by the standard for each of the pieces of equipment?
-
14. Are there records of master gages where indicated traceable to NIST?
15. Control of Non-Conformances
-
15. Is there an approved procedure in place for the control of non-conformances?
-
15. Are non-conformances being recorded?
-
15.1 Do the procedures contain a provision for non-conforming processes?
-
15.2 Are there methods to record non-conforming product and keep them from reaching the customer?
-
15.3 Is there a material dispositioning process including engineering approval where required?
16. Corrective Action
-
16. Is there an approved procedure in place for Corrective Action?
-
16 Does the CA procedure include all of the bullet points of the standard?
-
16. Is the CA process applied at the times indicated by the bullet points of the standard?
-
16. Are records of CA maintained at least until an annual MR takes place?
17. Handling, Storage, and Delivery of Product and Materials
-
17. Are materials and product stored and shipped with care required by contract?
18. Training
-
18. Do the records indicate the subject matter topics, qualified person providing the training, who attended and date of training?
-
Project Managers
-
Detailers
-
Inspectors
-
Welding Personnel
-
Fitters
-
Painters
-
18. Is there a record of comprehension of subject matter (desirable)?
19. Internal Audit
-
19. Has an internal audit been conducted by a qualified individual?
-
19. Does the record indicate findings and are these incorporated into the CA process?
-
19. Is the record of the IA maintained at least until the annual MR?
