QRF Quality Survey

1. Are stampped dwg., list, documentation, etc. used in manufacturing?

2. Are these stamped documentation updated to the latest edition?

3. Are these documentation issued with records under control?

4. Could YADA operators access the correct documentation while performing their job with convenience?

5. Could YADA personnel access the whole set of QRF documentation the latest edition?

1. Are QRF raw materials properly stored to prevent misuse or contamination?

2. Are QRF raw materials identified all necessary traceability info?

3. Is inventory log for all raw materials available and keep being updated per actual status?

4. Is there any raw material to be out of stock within one month, any plan to purchase?

5. Are MTR available, and signed off by CNBO representative?

6. Are MTR issued from approved source and found acceptable per review?

1. Are every QRF item in production (cutting, machining, etc.) with its traveler nearby?

2. Are every QRF item in stock area with its traveler nearby?

3. Is QRF hold/ reject area with access restriction?

4. Are QRF items in hold/ reject area with traceability info and hold/reject identification conspicuously marked on them?

5. Is hold/ reject items log maintained and keep being updated as per actual status?

6. Are hold/ reject items segregated from valid items in production and stock?

1. Is forging process instruction/ technical sheet available and accessible to operators on job?

2. Are properties of raw materials in compliance with the process documentation?

3. Is pattern of processing in compliance with the process documentation?

4. Is temperature of processing in compliance with the process documentation?

1. Is process instruction/ technical sheet available and accessible to operators on job?

2. Is the temperature of wax preparation within controlled range?

3. Is the pressure and duration of wax injection within controlled range?

4. Are cooling blocks utilized for each piece of wax after the wax injection?

5. Are the temperature and duration of cooling within controlled range?

1. Is designated furnace being used for QRF items?

2. Are thermocouples and temperature recorders with calibration certificate in valid due?

3. Is process technical sheet available and found acceptable per review?

4. Does operator correctly understand requirements of the technical sheet?

5. Are records of mechanical testing archived and keep being updated for each PO and item?

6. Is the furnace loading appropriate for prevention of clamp deformation during heat treatment?

7. Are these records signed off by CNBO representative and found to be acceptable per random review?

8. Are technical parameters correctly set and present as randomly witnessed?

1. Is designated furnace being used for QRF items?

2. Are thermocouples and temperature recorders with calibration certificate in valid due?

3. Is process technical sheet available and found acceptable per review?

4. Does operator correctly understand requirements of the technical sheet?

5. Are records of mechanical testing archived and keep being updated for each PO and item?

6. Is the furnace loading appropriate for prevention of clamp deformation during heat treatment?

7. Are these records signed off by CNBO representative and found to be acceptable per random review?

8. Are technical parameters correctly set and present as randomly witnessed?

1. Are machining stations with gap/ filler gage for batch verification in production?

2. Does operator know the range of criteria?

3. Does operator know the correct source of criteria to be referred to?

4. Are first 2 pcs of the shift sent to lab for profile measurement?

5. Are all shift profile measurement records archived and keep being updated for each production day?

1. Is QRF designated personnel assigned for the job?

2. Is acceptance criteria for visual inspection available?

3. Can inspector interpret the criteria correctly?

4. Does inspector perform visual inspection exactly as per the criteria (pls randomly check from available pieces)?

1. Are pins assembled per the correct parameters specified on assembly instruction?

2. Are clamps assembled in a manner that L pieces and R pieces won’t be duplicated in one set?

3. Are correct torque applied while being assembled for parallelism verification?

4. Is acceptance criteria for parallelism verification available and correctly understood by operators?

5. Is parallelism verification correctly conducted as randomly witnessed?

6. Is ‘H Series’ marking properly applied after being verified satisfactorily?

1. Is the operator applying correct marking format as per the latest requirements?

2. Is the operator applying correct marking contents as per the material data?

3. Is ‘H Series’ marking correctly applied to the clamp and packing?

4. Is ‘F’ marking correctly applied for the bolts FMPT inspected?

1. Is QRF designated inspector performing the inspection?

2. Does inspector know the range of criteria?

3. Does the inspector know the correct source of criteria to be referred to?

4. Is measurement result accurate as randomly spot checked?

5. Is measurement record prepared and well maintained?

1. Is QRF designated PT inspector performing the inspection?

2. Are full surface of the items being examined?

3. Is timing control correct as per the procedure?

4. Is penetrant removal applied correctly per the procedure?

5. Is B3/ B5 block tested at beginning of each shift?

6. Is correct and valid chemical used for penetrant test?

7. Is sufficient illumination utilized at the moment of inspection?

8. Are inspection records maintained and updated as per the inspection result?

1. Are coating certificates received and found acceptable per review?

2. Is Molykote certificate available?

3. Does inspector understand the acceptance criteria of coating inspection?

4. Is inspection correctly executed as per the criteria (pls randomly check appearance and soundness of the coating on seals)?

1. Does inspector understand the requirements of PMI for QRF parts?

2. Is PMI applied to seal 100% before sent to coating, and records are available?

3. Is PMI applied to other components 100% when deemed to be necessary, and records are available?

4. Is PMI machine available and in valid status?

5. Is PMI performed correctly (calibration before use, correctly interpret result, etc.) as randomly witnessed?

1. Is complete set of quality documentation prepared and ready for review?

2. Are raw materials’ MTR (bolt/nut incl.) reviewed and modified per comments?

3. Are HT reports/ records reviewed and modified per comments?

4. Are PT reports reviewed and modified per comments?

5. Are dimension measurement records reviewed and modified per comments?

6. Are seals’ coating inspection reports reviewed and modified per comments?

7. Are hub/seal’s stand-off measurements reports/records reviewed and modified per comments?

8. Are PMI records for grades other than SS304 reviewed and modified per comments?

9. Are assembly verification records reviewed and modified per comments?