Title Page
-
Document No.4
-
Audit TitleHarvesting Compliance Check Sheet Snig/Extraction Track Crossing
-
Client / Warda Pty Ltd
-
Prepared by Cara McMurtrie
-
Crossing ID
-
Feature
- Depression
- Line
- Watercourse
-
Structure
- Causeway
- Culvert
- Bridge
- Gully Stuffer
-
Is the location and type of crossing approved and marked in the field ( not permissible to cross wetlands or swamps; if IHL 3, not permissible to cross watercourse [ie has permanent or semi-permanent surface water flow]; may only cross drainage line with permanent structure.
- Yes
- No
- Not Applicable
-
If you answered no,how would you rate the incident
-
Track surface drained at 5-20 meters. Note Mandatory on drainage lines and watercourses. Use on drainage depressions where practical.
- Yes
- No
- Not Applicable
-
If you answered no, how would you rate the incident as
-
Is the crossing stable?. Guidance: - causeways must have stable surface or erosion resistant material; gully stuffers must be removed if they become unstable during operation.
- Yes
- No
- Not Applicable
-
If you answered no, how would you rate the incident
- Non Reportable
- Low
- Medium
- High Severity incident
-
Right angled clearing and approach Guidance: - Approach may only be angled if it reduces ground and soil disturbance.
- Yes
- No
- Not Applicable
-
If you answered no, how would you rate the incident
- Non Reportable
- Low
- Medium
- High Severity incident
-
Is spoil removed from drainage feature and disturbed areas reshape and stabilised.
- Yes
- No
- Not Applicable
-
If you answered no, how would you rate the incident
-
Is the disturbed areas 20 meters either side of watercourse or drainage line stabilised?.<br>Guidance: this does not include the track surface or drainage structures.
-
If you answered no how would you rate the incident?
-
Is the vegetation and ground disturbance minimised with filter strip, protection zone,operational zone and buffer strip either side of crossing.
-
If you answered no, how would you rate the incident as,
-
Are bridge embankments protected from table drain discharge and structures installed to prevent bridge pavement from entering drainage feature where practical.
-
If you answered no how would you rate the incident?.
-
Causeway surface, on either side, is no more than 10cm higher than invert of drainage feature, ( fish passage ), maintain natural flow of water course.
-
If the answer is no, how would you rate the incident?.
-
Is dispersible soil covered with stable material 20 meters either side of crossing?.<br>Guidance; includes road surface and table drain batters if dispersible.
-
If the answer is no, how would you rate the incident?.
-
Are temporary crossings removed and bed banks reshaped and stabilised?.
-
If you answered no, how would you rate the incident?.
-
Is the crossing constructed as planned, including implementation of any site-specific conditions?.<br>
-
If you answered no, how would you rate the incident?.
