Strut Bay Audit

• Site conducted

  Select

• Document No.

• Audit Title

• Picture of the Item

  Media

• Conducted on

  Date

• Prepared by

• Personnel

• Is the product under audit listed in the capabilities register? Ref - Exp 1.8 Appendix 1

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Picture of Item under audit

  Media

• Description of item.

• is the exposition available to the staff member? Ref - Exp 1.11.1 & 3.1.3

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Describe why was the Exposition unavailable.

Receipt and PO

• Has the receipt inspection been carried out IAW the exposition in relation to this product? Ref - Exp 2.2.1

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Customer RO matches the component

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Picture of Repair Order.

  Media

• Description of incorrect info on RO

• Clear scope of maintenance required is stated on the RO

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Picture of Repair Order.

  Media

• Description of Scope

• The RO states the approved data & revision status of the maintenance data to be used. (Note: This may be covered by the SLA)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Picture of Repair Order

  Media

• Description of CMM info

• Does the component have obvious damage/missing parts.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Add media

  Media

• Description of damage/missing parts.

Customer supplied parts

• Have any customer supplied parts been received for inclusion into the product? Ref - Exp 2.2.6

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Has the receipt inspection carried out.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Description of why the receipt inspection was not carried out.

• Has the correct documentation has been supplied by the customer.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Picture of supplied documentation.

  Media

• Description of supplied documentation

• Records of customer GRN in the BLI are evident.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Description

• Have the parts been stored & labelled appropriately?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Picture of part storage/label

  Media

• Description

Shelf life limited Items used or incorporated into the product

• Have any Shelf life limited Items been used in the maintenace of; or incorporated into the product? Ref - Exp 2.3.5

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Were the Shelf life limited Items used, in the maintenance of; or incorporated into the product, within their listed shelf life at the time of their use or incorporation? Ref - Exp 2.3.5

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of expired product used

  Media

• Have the removed parts been disposed of appropriately? Ref - Exp 2.3.8

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of incorrect disposal method.

  Media

Use of calibrated tooling by employees.

• Was any calibrated tooling used in the course of the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.6

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the equipment within it's recorded calibration interval at the time of its use? Ref - Exp 2.6.1

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of out of date calibration.

  Media

• undefined

• Were GSE items such as benches, assembly platforms and cages in serviceable condition and if applicable, inspected within the scheduled time period? Ref - Exp 2.6.4

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of condition of work surfaces and or GSE including inspection tags if applicable.

  Media

• Description

Cleanliness of maintenance facility

• Is the work area tidy? Ref - Exp 2.7

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of cleanliness of work space

  Media

• Is the product free from contaminants? Ref - Exp 2.7.2

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Add media

  Media

• Is there sufficient room to carry out the required maintenance?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of space available for maintenance.

  Media

• Is the segregation of activities adequate? Ref - Exp 2.7.3

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of segregation of activities.

  Media

• Are hazardous waste materials disposed of IAW DER guidelines? Ref - Exp 2.7.4

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• undefined

Current Maintenance Data

• Does the technician have access to controlled maintenance data (CMM)? Note the current revision & check against the CDB. Ref - Exp 2.8

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• undefined

• Does the BLI reflect the current maintenance data? Ref - Exp 2.8.4

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• undefined

• photographic evidence of controlled data reference in BLI

  Media

• Are any engineering orders necessary to carry out the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.8.6

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does the technician have access to the engineering order?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• photographic evidence of engineering order.

  Media

• Why was Technician unable to access the EO

• Is the Engineering Order current?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the technician aware of the procedure for reporting perceived errors in the maintenance data

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Name of technician interviewed.

Airworthiness Directives.

• Has the customer identified any Airworthiness Directive requirements in their RO? Ref - Exp 2.10

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Description

• pic of AWD

  Media

Maintenance documentation/CRS.

• Note the current revision of the BLI and check it against the CDB. Ref - Exp 2.12

• Is the technicians copy of the BLI the latest version as recorded in the CDB? Ref - Exp 2.12.3, 2.12.7 & 3.1.4

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Describe why the BLI in use is wrong.

• Is the technician aware of the precedence of the approved data over the BLI? Ref - Exp 2.12.3 & 3.1.4

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Has block 1 (release for maintenance) been signed by an approved person? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.1

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• photographic evidence of the completion of block 1.

  Media

• Task Handovers.<br>Are block 2 (stage of maintenance completions) signed and up to date? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.2 & 2.25.1

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• photographic evidence of the completion of block 2.

  Media

• Has block 3 (records of component replacements and unserviceabilities) been correctly filled out? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.3

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• photographic evidence of the completion of block 3.

  Media

• Has a calibrated tool been used in the course of the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.6

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Pic of the calibrated tooling used.

  Media

• Has this been recorded in Block 3 of the BLI? Ref - Exp 2.12.9

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Pic of Block record of Calibrated items

  Media

• Description

• Is the tool within it's re-calibration date.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Pic of out of CAL sticker

  Media

• Description

• Has block 4 (Final inspection certification) been completed by an authorised person? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.4, 2.15.2/3/9 & 3.5

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• photographic evidence of the completion of block 4 by an authorised person.

  Media

• Is the maintenance complete? Ref - Exp 2.15 to 2.16

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of the completion of maintenance.

  Media

• Is a CASA form 1 and/or ANDI report required for this type of maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.15

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the signatory, to the CASA form 1 and/or report, authorised to Release to Service?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• photographic evidence of the completion of CASA form 1 and/or ANDI report by an authorised employee.

  Media

• Has the maintenance been carried out IAW CASA Part 42 and Part 145? Ref - Exp 2.15.2

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Explain the nature of the failure to carry out maintenance IAW the above regulations.

• In the opinion of the subject matter expert below, is the product serviceable?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Name of subject matter expert.

Records for the operator.

• Has the documentation been made available to the operator? Ref - Exp 2.16

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• description of why documentation is not supplied.

• Are other records ie. EO's, SB's, AD's, and lifed items supplied if required?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In the course of maintenance, were any major defects, or suspected unapproved parts identified? Ref - Exp 2.17/18

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Were the major defects and/or suspected unapproved parts handled IAW the exposition? Ref - Exp 2.17/18

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Description of what was not conducted.

Use of external Contractors

• Has any part of the required maintenance been subcontracted to another person or organisation? Ref - Exp 2.19

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Was this captured by the use of a form 23 Request for subcontracted maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.19.1

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of the use of form 23.

  Media

• Explanation of the failure to use form 23.

Maintenance Errors

• Were any maintenance errors detected during stage of maintenance inspections or during final inspections? Ref - Exp 2.24

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of errors found during stage of maintenance or final inspections.

  Media

• Is the technician aware of the procedure for reporting suspected maintenance errors? Ref - Exp 2.24.2

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Name of technician interviewed.

Time to Complete maintenance

• Did the technician have sufficient time to complete the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.27

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Explanation of time restriction.

• Alternatively has the product overstayed its welcome? Ref - Exp 2.27

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Explanation why item has not been returned to the Operator

Technician Authority / Training

• Is the technicians RTE available? Ref - Exp 3.6.1

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the technician authorised to carry out the required maintenance? 3.6.2/3

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Description

• Are the technician's periodic authorisations up to date? Ref - Exp 3.6.3

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of currency of periodic authorisations.

  Media

• Is the technicians DAMP and Human Factors training current? Ref - Exp 3.9

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Photographic evidence of currency of DAMP and Human Factors training.

  Media

Competence Assessment

• With the help of a Supervisor or the Responsible Manager the Q&SM may, utilizing a checklist use this opportunity to reauthorise or revoke the technician approval.

• Are the technicians approvals being reviewed?

  Yes

  N/A

• Name of supervisor or Responsible Manager.

• Name of employee.

• Photographic evidence of competence assessment.

  Media