Information
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Client / Site
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
-
Personnel
Contractor
Location
-
Add location
Date - Time
-
Select date
Weather
Temperature
Specific task being performed
-
Maine line
-
Service
-
HDD
-
Leak repair
-
Sewer repair
-
Purge
-
Emergency repair
Other task not listed above
Operator Qualifications
-
Does the contractor have proper OQ documentation
-
Are there at least 2 OQ operators present
Safety items
-
Has the contractor completed the mandatory JSA
-
Has the inspector identified any employees not wearing the required PPE
-
List the name / names of any employee who is not wearing the correct PPE below
-
Has the inspector visually confirmed that the fire extinguisher is fully charged
-
Does the task require the use of a flash suit
-
Has the employee worn the suit during the necessary time
Excavations
-
Has the Dig Safe ticked been verified
-
Has the proposed excavation been properly pre-marked
-
Depth of excavation
-
Is there a trench box being used
-
Are there egress ladders in use every 25' for excavations over 4' deep
-
Are the spoil piles set back to the required minimum of 2'
-
Are there any unprotected holes that require immediate attention
Listed below are any comments that the inspector feels necessary related specifically to safety items
Job-Site Set Up
-
Has proper site set up been completed including proper signage per MUTCD
-
Are there flaggers in use
-
Are the flaggers posted at the beginning of the taper
-
Do the flaggers hold a valid certification
-
Do the flaggers have an escape route
-
Have provisions been made for safe pedestrian access including proper signs
-
Has the site set up properly barricaded the public from entering the work zone
-
Has the inspector had to make any corrections to the job site
Electro-Fusion Inspection Checklist
General:
-
Fusion Technicians Name:
-
Company:
-
Did the operator complete an inspection of equipment for cleanliness and proper operation
-
Did the operator clean pipe ends with a clean, dry, lint-free, non-synthetic cloth, such as cotton
Couplings
-
Were the pipe ends cut square and even
-
Was the stab depth marked on the pipe with an approved marking tool
-
Was the pipe scraped properly and the stab depth re-marked on the pipe
-
Was the OD of the pipe and the ID of the coupling cleaned with 96% solution isopropyl alcohol and allowed to dry
-
Was an approved scraper used and if so list the type
-
Was the pipe inserted into the coupling to the stab depth marks
-
Was the barcode on the fitting scanned using the reader wand on the processor
-
Was a check made to ensure the fitting was read correctly
-
Was the cooling time recorded on the pipe wall
Sidewall Fittings ( Including patches and tapping tees ):
-
Was the area to be fused marked with a non petroleum based marker
-
Was the area to be fused upon scraped with an approved pipe penetration tool
-
Was an approved scraper used and if so list the type
-
Was the area to be fused re-marked with a non petroleum based marker
-
Was the area to be fused cleaned with 96% solution isopropyl alcohol
-
Was the fitting to be fused cleaned with 96% solution isopropyl alcohol
-
Was the barcode on the fitting scanned using the reader wand on the processor
-
Was a check made to ensure the fitting was read correctly
-
Was the cooling time recorded on the pipe wall
-
Pass
-
Fail
-
Quantity of Fusions Inspected
-
Quantity of Fusions Found Unsatisfactory
-
Actions Taken
Additional Comments
Photos
-
Add media
Butt Fusion Inspection Checklist
-
Fusion Technician
-
Company
-
Did the operator complete an inspection of equipment for cleanliness and proper operation
-
Did the operator clean the pipe ends with a clean, dry, lint-free, non-synthetic cloth, such as cotton
-
Were the pipe ends faced to the facer stops
-
Were shavings and chips removed after facing pipe
-
Had the facer stopped rotating before the jaws were opened
-
When the pipe ends were brought together under pressure were any visual gaps observed
-
Did the operator check the alignment of the pipe ends
-
What is the measured amount of misalignment ( inches or MM)
-
Was the operation checked for pipe slippage at fusion pressure
-
Was drag pressure properly calculated
-
Drag pressure observed
-
How was Theoretical Fusion Pressure calculated ( not required for manual machines)
-
Data logger
-
Fusion Pressure Calculator
-
McCalc
-
Formula
-
What was the observed gauge pressure ( Theoretical Fusion Pressure + Drag) that was used to fuse the pipe
-
Was the heater cleaned and the surface temperature checked with a pyrometer
-
What was the observed pyrometer temperature reading
-
Was the recommended shift sequence followed ( hydraulic machines)
-
Was pressure applied during heat soak ( manual machines)
-
Did the bead size against the heater before the heater removal
-
Inspected pipe interfacial area after heater removal
-
Was the condition acceptable
-
Was the locking cam engaged during the cooling cycle ( manual machines)
-
Is the finished bead size uniform and acceptable
-
Completed cooling cycle time (under fusion pressure)
-
Hours
-
Minutes
-
Seconds
-
Is the operator proficient with the Data logger set up and operation
-
Was the joint Data logged
-
Pass
-
Fail
-
Quantity of Fusions Inspected
-
Quantity of Fusions Found Unsatisfactory
Additional Comments
Photos
-
Add media
Pipeline Pressure Test Report
-
This form must be completed for each section of newly installed section of pipe or service line that is disconnected from the main for any reason
Pipeline Data
-
Line Location
-
Pipeline Installed By:
-
Completion Date:
Test Data
-
Type of Pipe
-
Size of Pipe (Inches)
-
Length of Line (Linear Foot)
Test Medium
-
Nitrogen
-
Air
-
Natural Gas
-
Water
-
Other (please describe)
-
Time Started
-
Am
-
Pm
-
Time Ended
-
Am
-
Pm
-
Test Pressure Start (PSIG)
-
Test Pressure Stop (PSIG)
-
Line Loss
-
Corrective Measures Taken
Pressure Test Approval
-
Pass
-
Fail
-
Remarks
-
Contractor Representative:
-
Select date
-
Summit Natural Gas Inspector:
-
Select date
Photos
-
Add media
Daily Inspection Report - Mains/ Headers
-
Is this a main
-
Is this a header
-
CYBD Number
-
Service a Order Number
-
Tailgate Meeting Held
-
Increased Inspection Frequency
-
Nunber of Days
Crew Member Name and Title - Include OQ Approved ( List Task Numbers)
Inspection Checklist - Task
-
Are at least two OQ'd fusion operators present
-
Were pressure test reports reviewed
-
Were exposed main reports reviewed
-
Are photographs of all crossings within 14' attached
-
Was site material inspected for correctness and quality
-
Was backfill inspected for depth and quality
-
Are as-built drawings current and accurate
-
Quantity of fusions inspected
-
Quantity of fusions found unsatisfactory
-
Crew member performing functions
-
Action taken
Inspector
-
Add signature
-
Select date
Daily Inspection Report - Services
Crew Members Name and Title - Include OQ Approved (List Task Numbers
Service #1
-
Location - Street
-
Closest Intersection
-
Were pressure test reports reviewed
-
Were exposed main reports reviewed
-
Are photographs of all crossings within 14' attached
-
Was pipe protection required
-
Was the site material inspected for correctness and quality
-
Was backfill inspected for depth and quality
Service #2
-
Location - Street
-
Closest Intersection
-
Were pressure test reports reviewed
-
Were exposed main reports reviewed today
-
Are photographs of all crossings within 14' attached
-
Was pipe protection required
-
Was site material inspected for correctness and quality
-
Was backfill inspected for depth and quality
Service #3
-
Location - Street
-
Closest Intersection
-
Were pressure test reports reviewed
-
Were exposed main reports reviewed
-
Are photographs of all crossings within 14' attached
-
Was pipe protection needed
-
Was the site material inspected for correctness and quality
-
Was backfill inspected for depth and quality
Inspection Checklist - Task
-
Do all new crew members have OQ documentation approved by SNG-ME Forman prior to work
-
Are at least two OQ'd fusion operators present
-
Was fusion plates checked for temperature today
-
Are as-built drawings current and accurate
-
As-built should align with Commercial Report
-
Were pipe fusions inspected
-
Quantity of fusions inspected
-
Quantity of fusions found unsatisfactory
-
Crew member performing fusions
-
Action taken
-
Inspector
-
Add signature
-
Select date
Inspection of Exposed Pipe
-
Location - Street
-
Select date
By house number
By pole number
Other
Service
Main
Size
Depth of Pipe
Types of Pipe
-
Plastic
-
-
Steel
-
Condition of Pipe
-
Poor
-
-
Fair
-
-
Good
-
-
If Pitting, Depth if Pits
Coating
-
-
Condition
Coating Material
-
Epoxy (Green)
-
-
Plastic (Yellow)
-
-
Pritec ( Black)
-
Interior Condition
-
Checked
-
-
Not checked
-
If checked:
-
Tap Coupon
-
-
Pipe Segment
-
Condition
-
Poor
-
-
Fair
-
-
Good
-
-
Wall thick
Comments
-
Signature of Person Reporting:
-
Add signature
-
Signature of Secondary Qualified Reporter:
-
Add signature
Conclusion - Final thoughts and or Comments
Photos
-
Add media