Erith Hazard Spotting Report Rev 11

• Project Number

• Audit Title

• Client

• Conducted on

  Date

• Prepared by

• Accompanied by

• Location
  Address

• Personnel

• Company Division

  Select Demolition - London Infrastructure - Civils Washmills Erith House ABW Demolition - Regional Infrastructure - Remediation EPS Demolition - London (Basements) London Office

  • Demolition - London
  • Infrastructure - Civils
  • Washmills
  • Erith House
  • ABW
  • Demolition - Regional
  • Infrastructure - Remediation
  • EPS
  • Demolition - London (Basements)
  • London Office

• This report is to be used by the assessor to inspect the site and record any safety, health and environmental hazards. The assessor should also pick an area of further inspection (e.g. SSOW, PUWER, Emergency arrangements etc) to ensure these are compliant with regulations and in- house procedures

• Overview of current works

• Have items from previous inspections been closed out?

  Compliant (Site)

  Non-Compliant (Site)

  Improvement / Observation (Site)

  Not Applicable (Site)

Safety Compliance Review (Site)

Hazard

• Status

  Compliant (Site)

  Non-Compliant (Site)

  Improvement / Observation (Site)

  Not Applicable (Site)

• Closed out by (sign and date)

• Hazard definition

  Select 1st aid displayed information project paperwork site welfare COSHH fire precautions safety signage work @ height excavations plant & machinery lifting equipment crane edge protection temp works hot works isolations portable tools hoist MEWPS hoarding and fencing traffic routes access and egress PPE housekeeping environmental health hazards public interface site security

  • 1st aid
  • displayed information
  • project paperwork
  • site welfare
  • COSHH
  • fire precautions
  • safety signage
  • work @ height
  • excavations
  • plant & machinery
  • lifting equipment
  • crane
  • edge protection
  • temp works
  • hot works
  • isolations
  • portable tools
  • hoist
  • MEWPS
  • hoarding and fencing
  • traffic routes
  • access and egress
  • PPE
  • housekeeping
  • environmental
  • health hazards
  • public interface
  • site security

• Root Causality

  Select Design Error enforcing conditions Tools and Equipment Housekeeping Maintenance Management Procedures Training Communication Incompatibility of goals Organisation Defences Sub-contractor

  • Design
  • Error enforcing conditions
  • Tools and Equipment
  • Housekeeping
  • Maintenance Management
  • Procedures
  • Training
  • Communication
  • Incompatibility of goals
  • Organisation
  • Defences
  • Sub-contractor

Environmental and Sustainability Compliance Review (Site)

• Are COSHH items being stored correctly?

  Compliant (Site)

  Non-Compliant (Site)

  Improvement / Observation (Site)

  Not Applicable (Site)

• Are waste and chemicals stored away from drains / drains protected?

  Compliant (Site)

  Non-Compliant (Site)

  Improvement / Observation (Site)

  Not Applicable (Site)

• Is there good planning with regards spill protection?

  Compliant (Site)

  Non-Compliant (Site)

  Improvement / Observation (Site)

  Not Applicable (Site)

• Is Environental monitoring being completed?

  Compliant (Site)

  Non-Compliant (Site)

  Improvement / Observation (Site)

  Not Applicable (Site)

• Is there any evidence of materials / liquids being deposited outside of site boundary? (e.g. Mud on road etc)<br>

  Compliant (Site)

  Non-Compliant (Site)

  Improvement / Observation (Site)

  Not Applicable (Site)

Positive Site Observations

Positive observation

• Positive Observation

Environmental and Sustainability Document Review

• Has the PMP been updated (from tender copy / to reflect site progress)?

  Compliant (Docs)

  Non-Compliant (Docs)

  Not Applicable (Docs)

  Improvement / Observation (Docs)

• Has the EMP been updated (from tender copy)?

  Compliant (Docs)

  Non-Compliant (Docs)

  Not Applicable (Docs)

  Improvement / Observation (Docs)

• Has the SWMP been updated (within the last 3 months)?

  Compliant (Docs)

  Non-Compliant (Docs)

  Not Applicable (Docs)

  Improvement / Observation (Docs)

• Has the project carried out spill training?

  Compliant (Docs)

  Non-Compliant (Docs)

  Not Applicable (Docs)

  Improvement / Observation (Docs)

• Have both documents been briefed out to key members of staff (supervisor and above)?

  Compliant (Docs)

  Non-Compliant (Docs)

  Not Applicable (Docs)

  Improvement / Observation (Docs)

• Are waste tickets being completed correctly?<br>(Please provide examples)<br>

  Compliant (Docs)

  Non-Compliant (Docs)

  Not Applicable (Docs)

  Improvement / Observation (Docs)

Safety Documentation Review

• Use this section to review current site documents, this includes SSOW, daily and weekly inspections, training, temporary works, fire RA, ERP, LOLER etc. Record the document reviewed and status for each document reviewed

Document Reviewed

• Document Reference

• Status

  Compliant (Docs)

  Non-Compliant (Docs)

  Not Applicable (Docs)

  Improvement / Observation (Docs)

• Causality

  Select Information Incomplete Information not updated Not briefed out SSOW not followed SSOW not understood Procedure not followed Procedure not understood Procedure Inaccurate

  • Information Incomplete
  • Information not updated
  • Not briefed out
  • SSOW not followed
  • SSOW not understood
  • Procedure not followed
  • Procedure not understood
  • Procedure Inaccurate

• Closed out (Sign and Date)

SHEQ Bulletins

• SHEQ bulletins up to date and relevant

  Compliant (Docs)

  Non-Compliant (Docs)

  Not Applicable (Docs)

  Improvement / Observation (Docs)

Inspection Sign off

• Add signature

  Sign