Grosvenor HSE Audit

• Conducted on

  Date
• Location
  Address

• Contractor Representative:

• SHE Representative:

1.0 Risk Management Tools

• 1.1 Has workscope review been conducted and measured against existing risk assessment or JSEA?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Review of copies of overarching risk assessment
  2. Evidence of a Principal Hazard Management Plan
  3. Evidence of SOP application against workscope.
  4. Evidence of SWI

• Verification / Location

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments/Interview Comments:

• 1.2 Have JSEA's been conducted with a cross section of personnel?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of consultative forum identification and sign off on JSEA.

• Verification / Location

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments/Interview Comments:

• 1.3 Have JSEA's been effectively implemented in each area of operation?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of JSEA communication with the workforce.
  2. Evidence of controls being implemented.
  3. Evidence of controls being effective.

• Verification / Location

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments/Interview Comments:

• 1.4 Is there a SOP in place for each area of workscope operation?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Review SOP's available for site.
  2. Evidence of SOP mapping document against Project Workscope.

• Verification / Location

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments/Interview Comments:

• 1.5 Is each risk assessment for site covered by a SOP that has been reviewed and signed off by the SSE for site?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of SOP review and sign off in ATW work pack.

• Verification / Location

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments/Interview Comments:

• 1.6 Are SOP's reviewed at scheduled time frames to be mapped against workscope and risk assessment for relevance?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of SOP review scheduled time frames.

• Verification / Location

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments/Interview Comments:

• 1.7 Is a change management process in place to manage major risk assessment changes for site?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of change management process for site.

• Verification / Location

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments/Interview Comments:

• 1.8 Are JSEA's complete for all tasks?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. What trigger point is in place that determines a JSEA is to be completed for a task.
  2. Evidence of understanding by supervisors.

• Verification / Location

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments/Interview Comments:

2.0 Risk Implementation

• 2.1 Demonstrated risk implementation with contractor supervisory management stream.

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of supervisory interface to implement risk at the work face.
  2. How do supervisors do this?

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 2.2 How is the risk management system implemented in each work area?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of risk assessments.
  2. Evidence of contractor on boarding system.
  3. Evidence of JSEA.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 2.3 Do Contractor Safety Advisors meet with Contractor Supervision regularly to discuss safety implementation process for each area of operation?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of safety meetings to specifically address the implementation of safety in each area of operation.
  2. Evidence of hazard and near miss reporting.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 2.4 Are JSEA developed with the workforce on the ground?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Ask a sample of employees if they have been involved in JSEA development.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 2.5 Are contractor supervisors trained in contractor safety systems other than the induction process?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Review a sample of training in Contractor SOP's.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 2.6 What forums are utilised between Contractor and contractor groups to discuss and/or review safety systems?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of contractor onboarding addressing safety process through the Contractor Management System.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 2.7 What frequency are zero harm meetings held?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of meeting minutes required.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 2.8 Are contractor H&S Committee meetings held with a contractor representative present?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of contractor safety meetings being held with contractor input into the process.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 2.9 Safety Observations

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of safety observations being completed by a cross section of the workforce.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

3.0 Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment

• 3.1 Does a system exist for the formal identification of hazards and the assessment of risks and have all employees been trained in that system?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Employees or operators induction or training records.
  2. Provide procedure or instruction for hazard and near miss reporting.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 3.2 Have Supervisors been trained in Hazard ID and JSEA development?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Supervisors Training Records

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 3.3 Do the employees understand the requirement to identify and report hazards? <br>Are they competent to do so?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. VFL Evidence
  2. Hazard report evidence from CMW.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 3.4 Is team based risk assessment being conducted for identification of hazards for major work?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Supervisors, management, employees or operators and records.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 3.5 What is done with the hazards identified from the team based risk assessments?<br>Does a program of follow up exist and how effective is it?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of WRACS, Copies of CRAWS.
  2. SWI, JSEA management of hazards.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 3.6 Are the recommended controls being identified from risk assessments so that personnel are not exposed to the significant hazards?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of WRACS, Copies of CRAWS.
  2. SWI JSEA management of hazards, records and employees.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 3.7 How effective is the SLAM process in managing hazards in the workplace?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of SLAM contribution to managing hazards in the workplace.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

• 3.8 Are the hazards regularly reviewed to ensure elimination of high potential hazards?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of HPH recording.
  2. Evidence of HPH lead performance management tool.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditors Comments / Interview Comments:

4.0 Hazard Identification and Risk Management

• 4.1 Has a hazard analysis of the contractors workscope/operation been conducted and recorded?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Risk assessment reports.
  2. Review a sample of safety incidents to determine if additional hazards have been identified.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 4.2 Has a risk assessment been conducted on all identified HPH's?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Risk ratings for all identified hazards that include consequence, likelihood and rating.
  2. Paper evidence of risk assessment managing the hazard.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 4.3 Have controls been identified for the risk identified using the hierarchy of control?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Action plans for the implementation of controls.
  2. Review a sample of controls and decide if hierarchy of control applied.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 4.4 Have the controls that have been implemented been effective?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Reports on status of action items.
  2. Review a sample of safety incidents to determine if hazards are controlled.
  3. Evidence of improvement in OH&S performance.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 4.5 Are workscope changes and/or modifications subjected to hazard analysis? <br>Change management - Has risk ID processes in place as part of that system.

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Ask a sample of employees to identify changes.
  2. Risk assessment reports on above changes.
  3. Evidence of a change management document.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 4.6 Is the hazard register updated whenever hazards are identified in a change or modification?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of a hazard register.
  2. Does the register include hazard list changes.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 4.7 Is a JSEA system for controlling hazards within tasks in place?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Lists of Job Safety Analysis or similar.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 4.8 Have employees been trained in developing a JSEA?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Training records for JSEA.
  2. Training course content. (Induction id OK)
  3. What does the organisation do in addition to the site induction?

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 4.9 Are JSEAs accessible to employees?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Ask sample of employees to describe how to access JSEAs
  2. Are JSEAs readily available at the workfront.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

5.0 Contractor Risk Management

• 5.1 Are there pre mobilisation meetings held with contractor groups to review relevant SHMS systems?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Records of attendance at induction for all employees, including managers.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.2 Is there a centralised distribution and communication point to implement SHMS with contractor groups?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of single point of contractor groups to manage contractor SHMS system.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.3 What process is in place to determine whether contractor groups have been communicated the SHMS for site.

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of communication with contractor groups pre and post mobilisation.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.4 Are contractor project teams oriented into contractor's safety management system?<br>How does this occur and over what time frame.

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Demonstration of culture and training.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.5 How do contractor groups train supervisors in site contractor safety systems such as ATW management?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of ATW training attendance.
  2. Comparison of major hazards in hazard register with induction hazard awareness.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.6 How do tier 1 contracts ensure sub contractor employees are trained in the sites SHMS requirements?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Induction and other training records for all employees.
  2. Access to these records.
  3. Evidence of subcontractor interface and management.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.7 Is there a weekly / monthly SHMS reporting system in place?<br>What process is used to review and audit contractor groups on site?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of contractor monthly report.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.8 Is there a standardised communication process between Contractor Safety & Contractor Construction departments?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of communication between safety and construction departments.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.9 Do contractor supervisory structures effectively manage the safety processes in their respective work areas?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of Contractor Supervisory/Worker Interface.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 5.10 Are there regular safety meetings with contractor groups to review work scope and measure risk mitigation process against it?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of risk management safety meetings as a lead performance indicator.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

6.0 Lead Performance Indicators

• 6.1 Does management attend the prestart safety meetings held on site?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify with attendance records.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 6.2 VFL's

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify with evidence from meetings or if possible attend a meeting.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 6.3 Safety professional meeting.

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify with evidence from meetings and manager evidence.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 6.4 Look ahead scheduling

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Are they all addressed - verify with employees opinion.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 6.5 Hazard Reporting

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of hard reporting.
  2. Evidence of hazard management.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 6.6 How is safety data tracked to develop lead performance indicators in critical path areas.

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of enablon entries
  2. Evidence of action item close out.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 6.7 What audit process is in place to monitor and review the risk implementation process for site?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of contractor internal audit and monitor schedule.
  2. Evidence of contractor audit and monitor procedure.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

7.0 Daily Planned Inspections

• 7.1 Has a site procedure been developed to describe the method and responsibilities for conducting workplace inspections based on risks and legislative requirements?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Site procedure listing the various inspections.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 7.2 Are workplace inspections being conducted as per the procedure?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Records of inspections.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 7.3 Are relevant employees involved in the process (eg. safety reps)?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of employee involvement in the process.
  2. List of participants.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 7.4 Are the results of inspections systematically followed up to identify the causes of non-conformances and are these addressed by the supervisiion?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Reports on and analysis of non-conformances.
  2. Actions register for non-conformances.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 7.5 Are corrective actions planned and implemented in a timely manner?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Action plans from inspections.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 7.6 Specific inspections.

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Are specific checklists in place to mitigate risk in the workplace ie. circuit checklist, working at height checklist

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 7.7 Do all personnel that enter the workplace complete a DPI?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Records of inspections.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 7.8 Are hazard inspections taking place in each work area?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Is an effective hazard reporting culture in place?

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

8.0 Permit Systems

• 8.1 Is there a ATW in place for all work scope areas?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Sight evidence of permit system.
  2. Ask supervisors to list permits available on site.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 8.2 Is there an expiry date on permits?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of expiry dates on permits.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 8.3 Is there a trigger point mapping daily work scope to permit system?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. How do contractor supervisors monitor the progress of works and manage the interface of the permit system against it?

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 8.4 Permit system implementation

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Evidence of how the sites permit system is implemented and interfaced with separate work groups.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 8.5 Supervisory understanding of permit system.

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Does the supervisory structure understand how to implement the sites permit system and the content of the work pack?

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

9.0 Visible Felt Leadership

• 9.1 Does a system exist for task observation on site and within the contractors organisation?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify by seeing records of observations.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 9.2 Have the personnel conducting the observations been trained in task observation?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify with training records.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 9.3 Have all employees been provided with an overview of task observations?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify with employees.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 9.4 How were the critical tasks to be observed assessed as appropriate and worthwhile for performing task observations?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify critical task assessment list and ranking.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 9.5 Are the task observations scheduled and are the personnel responsible aware of this timetable?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify with schedule and personnel.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

• 9.6 What feedback is given to personnel on these observations and what if any action comes from this feedback?

  0

  1

  2

  3

• 1. Verify feedback and process.

• Verification / Location:

  Onsite

  Electronic Hard Copy

  Enablon

  Scenario

• Action:

  Yes

  No

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Corrective Action:

• Allocated Person:

• Finish Date:

• Auditor Comments / Interview Comments:

Positive Findings:

Contractor Representative Sign Off:

• Add signature

  Sign

SHE Representative Sign Off:

• Add signature

  Sign