HSF11 Site Safety Inspection

• Document Number

Project

• Project Number

• Conducted on

  Date

• Client

• Site

• Project Manager

• Site Manager

• Auditor

• LSP

RAMS/Induction

• Was a site Induction carried out

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Have suitable measures been taken to ensure operatives are aware of site rules / safety procedures etc

  Yes

  No

• Are there any non conformances relating to the use of USS references

  Yes

  No

  N/A (not a USS project)

• Are RAMS suitable for the job - they cover the work that being undertaken including commissioning

  Yes

  Improvement required

• What needs to be improved

  Select Risk assessment does not cover risks at site Scope is inadequate SSOW does not cover works

  • Risk assessment does not cover risks at site
  • Scope is inadequate
  • SSOW does not cover works

• Are RAMS signed by the operatives currently on site

  Select some operatives have signed the RAMS All operatives present have signed the RAMS No evidence that anyone has signed the RAMS

  • some operatives have signed the RAMS
  • All operatives present have signed the RAMS
  • No evidence that anyone has signed the RAMS

Project Folder Audit Pre Visit

• RAMS - In date and reviewed

  Yes

  No

• Quote to client in folder

  Yes

  Not in folder

• PO from Client in project folder

  Yes

  Not in folder

• PO to LSP in project folder

  Yes

  Not in folder

• PO for equipment

  Yes

  Not in folder

• RAMS signed by site operatives and available in the project folder

  Yes

  No

• Operatives site competencies in project folder

  Yes

  No

• Induction to site evidence in folder

  Yes

  No

• Plant pre use checks documented in the folder

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Overall is the HSEQIS Folder compliant to Convergint standards

  Good

  Fair

  Poor
Name of Engineers on site and competency

• Name of Engineer

• Does the engineer have the correct certificates ECS/CSCS and any others required IPAF etc

  Yes

  No

• There is evidence of certification in the project folder for this operative

  Select Yes No There is evidence but it is out of date Some certificates are present but no evidence of CSCS/ECS

  • Yes
  • No
  • There is evidence but it is out of date
  • Some certificates are present but no evidence of CSCS/ECS

Work at Height

• Is work at height occurring

  Yes

  No

• What type of access equipment is being used

  Select Stepladders ladders Scissor lift Cherry picker PECO/ ECO Mobile Scaffold Podium Hop up

  • Stepladders
  • ladders
  • Scissor lift
  • Cherry picker
  • PECO/ ECO
  • Mobile Scaffold
  • Podium
  • Hop up

• Is the stepladder tagged and inspected

  Yes

  No

• Is the ladder tagged and inspected

  Yes

  No

• Does the scissor lift have a LOLER certificate and are checks being carried out and documented

  Yes

  No

• Does the MEWP have an in date LOLER (UP TO 6 MONTHS) are pre use chscks being carried out and documented

  1 Week

  2 Weeks

• Does the PECO/ECO have an in date LOLER cert (under 6 months) and are pre use checks being carried out and documented

  Yes

  No

• Was the mobile scaffold assembled by an PASMA certified operative and are pre use check being carried out and documented

  Yes

  No

• Is the access equipment the right type for the work

  Select No the work requires a different type of access equipment Yes

  • No the work requires a different type of access equipment
  • Yes

• Is work at height above 2 meters

  Yes the work is over 2 m

  No the work is below 2 m

• The control hierarchy should be implemented please list what is in place

  Select Avoid working at height - so far as is reasonably practicable work should be conducted at ground level; Prevent falls – where working at height cannot be avoided, prevent falls using an existing safe place of work or use the correct type of equipment. A safe place of work may need to be created if none exists (e.g. using temporary guard rails around a roof, or by providing a correctly constructed scaffold); Minimise the distance and consequence of a fall - so far as is reasonably practicable, to provide the right type of work equipment to minimise the distance and consequences of a fall. (e.g. the distance that a person can fall can be reduced with safety nets or fall arrest systems); Reduce duration time spent required to be at height - co-ordination of maintenance needs can combine several small maintenance jobs together; and Training and instruction - ensure where working at height is undertaken that all such work is to be appropriately planned (including selection of work equipment) and supervised and that this work is conducted by suitable and sufficiently competent personnel.

  • Avoid working at height - so far as is reasonably practicable work should be conducted at ground level;
  • Prevent falls – where working at height cannot be avoided, prevent falls using an existing safe place of work or use the correct type of equipment. A safe place of work may need to be created if none exists (e.g. using temporary guard rails around a roof, or by providing a correctly constructed scaffold);
  • Minimise the distance and consequence of a fall - so far as is reasonably practicable, to provide the right type of work equipment to minimise the distance and consequences of a fall. (e.g. the distance that a person can fall can be reduced with safety nets or fall arrest systems);
  • Reduce duration time spent required to be at height - co-ordination of maintenance needs can combine several small maintenance jobs together; and
  • Training and instruction - ensure where working at height is undertaken that all such work is to be appropriately planned (including selection of work equipment) and supervised and that this work is conducted by suitable and sufficiently competent personnel.

• Do the engineers have the right competency to carry out the work at height using the access equipment available

  Yes

  No

  Not observed during site visit

Maglocks

• Are maglocks installed or being on site

  Yes

  No

• Are Maglocks being installed with safety straps on both the armature and the plates

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Has there been explicit written instructions from the client to not install the straps

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is threadlock being applied to all fixings

  Yes

  No

• Has the installation standard been effectively communicated to the install team both in the RAMS and verbally

  Yes

  No

Work Environment

• PTW

  Yes

  No

• Does the work require this additional safety process to be implemented

  No

  Yes

• Are local and environmental factors given consideration

  Yes

  No

• Are there any aspects of the work or the working environment that you feel could be considered unsafe

  Safe

  At Risk

• Dust production present

  NO

  Yes

• Other

Signage & Barriers

• Are they available and in use where required

  Yes

  No

• Are they the right type of barriers & signage for the environment and work

  Yes

  No

• Are they labelled with Convergint and a site contact name number?

  Select Yes they are clearly labelled No this should be done to ensure clarity on ownership They have some identification but this could be clearer n/a

  • Yes they are clearly labelled
  • No this should be done to ensure clarity on ownership
  • They have some identification but this could be clearer
  • n/a

Work Equipment

• Right tools for the task

  Yes

  No

• Work equipment is kept in a lockable site box

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Site box is clearly labelled with company and site contact name and number

  Select Yes they are clearly labelled No this should be done to ensure clarity on ownership They have some identification but this could be clearer n/a

  • Yes they are clearly labelled
  • No this should be done to ensure clarity on ownership
  • They have some identification but this could be clearer
  • n/a

• PAT testing on electrical equipment has been carried out with in date stickers displayed

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Where are tools stored

Housekeeping

• Are high standards of housekeeping being implemented

  Yes

  No

• Are all tools & equipment stored out of walkways and do not pose a slip trip and fall hazard

  Yes

  No

  Not observed during site visit

• Do the engineers have a storage area to ensure tools equipment etc can be secured at the end of the day

  Yes

  No

  N/A

COSHH

• Are COSHH articles used on site?

  Yes

  No

• Are they stored and used correctly

  Yes

  No

Welfare facilities

• Are there adequate sanitary faclities

  Yes

  No

• Is there somewhere that the engineers can make hot food and drink

  Yes

  No

Waste disposal

• What are the protocols for disposing of waste at site

• Are waste transfer notes in use where required

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Are these in the project Folder

  Yes

  Not in folder

PPE

• Are operatives wearing the correct PPE

  Select Hard hat Hi Vis Boots Safety glasses Gloves Other

  • Hard hat
  • Hi Vis
  • Boots
  • Safety glasses
  • Gloves
  • Other

Health and Safety training

• Do engineers have Asbestos training

  Select Asbestos is not required for this project Building has asbestos and the workers do not have asbestos training Workers have basic asbestos but are required to hold UKATA Workers hold the right training

  • Asbestos is not required for this project
  • Building has asbestos and the workers do not have asbestos training
  • Workers have basic asbestos but are required to hold UKATA
  • Workers hold the right training

• Do the engineers have other health and safety training

  Select Yes they have H&S training No they do not have any health and safety training

  • Yes they have H&S training
  • No they do not have any health and safety training

• Health and Safety challenges for the project.

• Evidence/signs of forced labour

  Suspected

  Confirmed

  None observed

• H&S Rating given on LSP Smartsheet

  Rating to be given

  Project has only just started

• Non Conformance (Findings that require action)

• Root Cause (underlying reason for non conformance)

  Select Complacency lack of training Restrictions of access to SharePoint Other

  • Complacency
  • lack of training
  • Restrictions of access to SharePoint
  • Other

• Corrective action and accountability (what needs to be actioned & by who)

• Proposed Completion date

  Date

• Action completion date

  Date

• Any actions not completed please give reasons why (these may be shared with line management for any lessons learnt)