Title Page

  • Site conducted

  • Conducted on

  • Auditor

  • Auditee

  • Audit Standard

Review of previous audit findings

  • Date of last internal audit

  • Are any actions from previous internal audit still outstanding?

  • Date of last external audit (DOC)

  • Are any actions from previous external audit still outstanding?

1.2 Objectives

  • 1.2.1 Does the company / safety management system satisfy the requirement to ensure safety at sea, prevention of human injury or loss of life, and avoidance of damage to the environment, in particular the marine environment and to property?

  • 1.2.2.1 Do the Safety management objectives of the company provide for safe practices in ship operation and safe working environment?

  • 1.2.2.2 Do the safety management objectives of the company assess all identified risks to it's ships, personnel and the environment and establish appropriate safeguards?

  • 1.2.2.3 Does the safety management objectives of the company continuously improve safety management skills of personnel ashore and aboard ships, including preparing for emergencies related both to safety and environmental protection?

  • 1.2.3.1 Does the SMS ensure compliance with mandatory rules and regulations?

  • 1.2.3.2 Does the SMS ensure that applicable codes, guidelines and standards recommended by the IMO, flag state, class societies and maritime industry organisations are taken into account?

1.3 Application

  • 1.3 Are the requirements of the ISM code applied to all ships within the company?

1.4 Functional requirements for a Safety Management System

  • Verify Company Safety Management Structure (Org chart)

  • 1.4.1 Verify Safety and Environmental-protection policy

  • 1.4.2 Does the company have instructions and procedures to ensure safe operation of ships and protecting of the environment in compliance with relevant international and flag state legislation?

  • 1.4.2 Confirm / verify procedures in place:

  • 1.4.3 Does the Safety Management System define levels of authority and lines of communication between, and amongst shore and shipboard personnel?

  • 1.4.4 Does the Safety Management System contain procedures for reporting accidents and non-conformities?

  • 1.4.5 Does the Safety Management System contain procedures to prepare for and respond to emergency situations?

  • 1.4.6 Does the safety management system contain procedures for internal audits and management reviews?

2 Safety and Environmental Protection Policy

  • 2.1 Review Company Safety and environmental protection policy

  • 2.2 Is the Company Safety and Environmental protection policy implemented from the highest level of the organisation?

  • 2.2 Are management personnel familiar with policies?

  • Verify policies:

  • 2.2 How does the company ensure that the S&E Policy is implemented and maintained at all levels of the organisation, both ship-based and shore-based?

3 Company Responsibilities & Authority

  • 3.1 Is the entity responsible for the operation of the ship also the owner?

  • 3.1 If the entity who is responsible for the operation of the ship is other then the owner, has the owner reported the full name and details of such entity to the administration?

  • 3.2 Does the Safety Management System define and document the responsibility, authority and interrelation of all personnel who manage, perform and verify work relating to and affecting safety and pollution prevention?

  • 3.2 Confirm the following positions of responsibility and authority are verified and roles defined within the Safety Management System:

  • 3.3 Does the company management system identify how adequate shore-based support is provided to enable the designated person or persons to carry out their functions?

4 Designated Person(s)

  • 4 Does the Safety Management System effectivly identify the DP(s)?

  • Provide name of DP(s)

  • 4 Is more than 1 DP identified within the Safety Management System?

  • How is DP function maintained during periods of leave?

  • 4 Are the responsibilities of the DP(s) documented within the Safety Management System?

  • 4 Does the DP have a record of interventions / link with highest level of management?

  • 4 Does the DP monitor safety and pollution-prevention aspects of the operation of each ship?

  • 4 Is the DP able to ensure adequate resources and shore-based support are applied, as required?

5 Master's Responsibility and Authority

  • 5.1 Verify the Safety Management system contains provisions covering the following areas of Master's responsibility:

  • 5.1 Is the safety management procedure covering Master's review of the SMS being followed?

  • 5.1 Are all sections of the Safety Management System included within the Master's review system?

  • Was a sample reviewed?

  • 5.2 Does the Safety Management System contain a clear statement emphasizing the master's authority?

  • 5.2 Does the Safety Management System establish that the master has the overriding authority and the responsibility to make decisions with respect to safety and pollution prevention and to request the company's assistance as may be necessary?

6 Resources and Personnel

6.1 The Master

  • 6.1.1 Are provisions in place to ensure each master is properly qualified for command?

  • 6.1.2 Are provisions in place to ensure each master is fully conversant with the company's safety management system?

  • 6.1.3 Are provisions in place to ensure each master is given necessary support so that the master's duties can be safely performed?

6.2 Each Ship

  • 6.2.1 Are provisions in place to ensure each ship is manned with qualified, certified and medically-fit seafarers in accordance with national and international requirements?

  • 6.2.2 Are provisions in place to ensure each ship is appropriately manned in order to encompass all aspects of maintaining safe operations on board? (*Minimum Safe Manning)

6.3 - 6.7 The Company

  • 6.3 Is provision in place to ensure new personnel and personnel transferred to new assignments related to safety and protection of the environment are given proper familiarisation with their duties?

  • 6.3 Are instructions essential to be provided prior to sailing identified within the SMS? documented and given?

  • 6.4 Does the company ensure that all personnel involved in the company's safety management system have adequate understanding of relevant rules, regulation, codes and guidelines?

  • 6.5 Has the company established and maintained procedures for identifying training?

  • 6.6 Has the company established procedures by which the ships personnel receive relevant information on the safety management system in a working language or languages understood by them?

  • 6.7 Are there procedures in place to ensure that the ship's personnel are able to communicate effectively in the execution of their duties related to the safety management system?

7 Shipboard Operations

  • 7 Are procedures, plans and instructions, including checklists as appropriate for, key shipboard operations concerning the safety of the personnel, ship and the protection of the environment?

  • 7 Are tasks defined and assigned to qualified personnel?

  • 7 Check sample of a company issued checklist

8 Emergency Preparedness

  • 8.1 Has the company identified potential emergency shipboard situations, and established procedures to respond to them?

  • 8.2 Has the company established programmes for drills and exercises to prepare for emergency actions?

  • 8.3 Does the SMS provide for measurers ensuring the company's organisation can response at any time to hazards, accidents and emergency situations involving it's ships?

  • 8.3 Are records showing company emergency drills with vessels available for inspection?

  • Date of last company emergency drill

9 Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences

  • 9.1 Does the safety management system include procedures ensuring that non-conformities, accidents and hazardous situaitons are reported to the company?

  • 9.1 Are non-conformities, accidents and hazardous situations investigated effectively?

  • 9.1 Are non-conformities, accidents and hazardous situations analysed with the objective of improving safety and pollution prevention?

  • 9.2 Has the company established procedures for the implementation of corrective actions?

  • 9.2 Do corrective actions sampled include measures intended to prevent recurrence of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous situations?

10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment

  • 10.1 Has the company established procedure to ensure that the ships are maintained in conformity with the provisions of the relevant rules and regulations and with any additional requirements which may be established the company?

  • 10.2.1 Are inspections held at appropriate intervals?

  • 10.2.2 are non-conformities reported with possible cause?

  • 10.2.3 Is evidence available to show appropriate corrective action taken?

  • 10.2.4 Is detail relating to activities in maintenance of ships and equipment recorded?

  • 10.2.4 Is a planned maintenance system in place?

  • 10.3 Has the company identified equipment and technical systems the sudden operational failure of which may result in hazardous situations?

  • 10.3 Does the Safety Management system provide for specific measures aimed at promoting the reliability of critical equipment and systems?

  • 10.3 Does the Safety Management system include provision of procedure for regular testing of stand-by arrangements and equipment or technical systems that are not in continuous use?

  • 10.4 Are previsions of 10.2 & 10.3 integrated into the ships operational maintenance routines?

11 Documentation

  • 11.1 Has the company established and maintained procedures to control all documents and data with are relevant to the Safety Management System?

  • 11.2.1 Does the company ensure that valid documents are available at all relevant locations?

  • 11.2.2 Does the company ensure that changes to documents are reviewed and approved by authorised personnel?

  • 11.2.3 Does the company ensure that obsolete documents are promptly removed?

  • 11.3 Does each ship carry on board all documentation relevant to that ship?

12 Company verification, review and evaluation

  • 12.1 Has the company carried out internal safety audits on board and ashore at intervals not exceeding 12 months?

  • If an internal safety audit is overdue, has this period exceeded 15 months since the last audit?

  • 12.2 Has the company periodically verified whether all those undertaking delegated ISM-related tasks are acting in conformity with the company's responsibilities under the code?

  • 12.3 Has the company periodically evaluated the effectiveness of the safety management system in accordance with procedures established by the company?

  • 12.4 Have audits and possible corrective actions been carried out in accordance with documented procedures?

  • 12.5 Are personnel carrying out audits independent of the areas being audited?
  • 12.6 Are results of audits and reviewed brought tot he attention of all personnel having responsibility in the area involved?

  • 12.7 Are corrective actions on deficiencies found during audit being closed in a timely manner?

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.