Title Page
-
Audit Description
-
Conducted on
-
Auditee (Surveyor)
-
Was this resurvey undertaken following on from non conforming work
- Yes
- No
- N/A
-
Was the re survey inspection satisfactory?
-
Auditor
-
Project manager responsible for survey
-
Template revision number and name
Audit Details & Summary
-
This Audit Covers
- Re-survey Assessment
-
Was this re-survey undertaken when the surveyor was still present on site or after?
-
Client
-
Site address
-
Job number
-
Scope of works
-
Building type / Types witnessed on audit
- Domestic Management
- Domestic Refurbishment
- Domestic Demolition
- Commercial Management
- Commercial Refurbishment
- Commercial Demolition
- Industrial Management
- Industrial Refurbishment
- Industrial Demolition
-
Proportion % of areas witnessed during audit
- <25%
- 25%
- 33%
- 50%
- 66%
- 75%
- 100%
-
Acceptance of audit findings
-
Auditor
-
Auditee
Re-Survey assessment (HSG264/RG8)
-
When completed on site at the same time as the surveyor , the auditor and surveyor must not be in the room at the same time to ensure the assessment is completed 'blind' . Once re-assessment is completed a comparison of both sets of data survey data must be completed.
-
Type or types of survey being re inspected
- Domestic Management
- Domestic Refurbishment
- Domestic Demolition
- Commercial Management
- Commercial Refurbishment
- Commercial Demolition
- Industrial Management
- Industrial Refurbishment
- Industrial Demolition
-
Is / was the original surveyor qualified and approved to complete the type/s of survey undertaken?
-
Is the re-survey being completed on the same day of the original survey?
-
Was the correct type of survey undertaken? (in relation to client’s requirements / instructions).
-
Have site drawings been suitably drawn and annotated in line with standard proceedures?
-
Was data entry accurate? review the item description, extents, applicable material & priority assessments, accessibility & notes to ensure they are unambiguous & unique
-
Are the recommendations in the report appropriate for the condition and location of identified materials?
-
Were areas of any limited access / no access justified?
-
Do areas of limited access or no access require a further revisit?
-
Were the sample location points clearly labelled? (subject to the client’s instructions).
-
Have sampling strategies/procedures been undertaken inline with HSG264 / Standard proceedures / RAMS?
-
Was a reasonable negative sampling strategy adopted on site?
-
Were all reasonably accessible ACMs or suspect ACMs identified within the survey data?
-
With a comparison of the audit and survey data are findings satisfactory? specific noted issues will be recorded above
-
Are further site re surveys required on the surveyor?
- Yes
- No
- N/A
-
Site drawing if required
-
Notes: General observations of surveyed areas
