Information

  • AS 4024-1502:2019 Validation of Machinery

  • Document No.

  • Client / Site

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

Scope of this Document

Objective and Scope

Validation

Standards Referenced in this document

Document Version

  • Revision Number

  • Revision Reason

  • By whom

Executive Summary

Details:

  • undefined

Phase 1 - Mechanical & Integrated Safeguards

Documentation Reviewed

  • Risk Assessment reviewed

  • Are there Functional Safety Descriptions (FSDs) available?

  • Check with OEM for pre start checklists of safety functions. They should be reasonably expected to share this along with the Functional Safety Descriptions

  • Is an SRS (Safety Requirements Specifications) available?

  • Is there a SISTEMA report or similar?

  • Is there any FAT or pre-start commissioning checklists available?

  • Document Number:

  • Is the Performance Level of the machinery determined by OEM or Risk Assessment

  • What is the required PLr for the machinery? [From risk assessment or site minimum requirement.]

  • Are all tasks and hazards associated identified in the risk assessment

Machine Identification

  • Type of Machinery

  • Basic machine operation

  • Photo

  • Installation type

  • Manufacturer of Machine

  • Machine Model Number

  • Machine Serial Number

  • Documentation Reviewed
  • Document Type

  • Document Number

  • Machinery Safeguarding Analysis
  • Area of machine:

  • Safeguards are required on this machine.

  • Type of Safeguards

  • Safeguards selected are the appropriate type for the process

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • Safeguards are fixed in place and secured by appropriate fixings and correctly interlocked?

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • All identified gaps are considered compliant

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • Safeguards prevent access to dangerous moving parts?

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • A tool is required to remove existing guarding.

  • Guarding is Compliant when (According to ISO14119) guard fixings are considered tamperproof and robust enough to withstand tampering.

  • Is there a permit system in place prior to the removal of guarding. (Safe System of Work)

  • Supervision of all tools required to open guards is strongly recommended. Operators and cleaners for example should not have uncontrolled access. FLM or local supervisor should retain and log usage of such tools for verification (incident management). It is normal for maintenance to have access to such tools.

  • Are all electrical fixtures are covered and locked.

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • All electrical cabinets, MCC's DB's and control boxes must be securely fitted with covers and locked at all times such that only certified electrical personnel have access. Per AS/NZS 3000:2008

  • Machinery has integrated safeguarding (eg two-handed or hold-to-run jog operation) allowing operation through guards [not whole of body access]

  • See details in Predictable Failure Testing

  • Walkways, platforms, self-closing gates and guard rails are used to allow safe access to machinery?

  • Are they compliant?

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • Monitoring, adjustment or maintenance points are located outside the guarded area to allow safe maintenance.

  • Is LOTO isolation present on the machinery and appropriately located outside of the guarded or hazardous areas?

  • Electrical Isolator is fitted

  • Pneumatic Isolator is fitted

  • Hydraulic Isolator is fitted

  • Steam Isolator is fitted

Phase 2 - Safety Controls System Validation

Phase 2 Validation of the Logic System

  • What SRPCS Safety logic system is used?

  • Is there an SSRS available or evidence of safety software fault testing?

  • Enter into documents reviewed list if not already done.

  • How has the software been checked for errors and systematic failures?

  • All the safety logic devices securely mounted (DIN rail or screw base etc)

  • All the connections to the safety devices secure?

  • What is the PL acheived (as tested or evaluated)?

  • PL actual meets or exceeds PLr (PL required)

  • PL actual does not meet PLr (PL required)

Machinery Normal Operation

  • Verify that the Machine can be placed into a ready-to-run condition

  • Initial Condition: Machine is Idle - contractors open , drives off

  • Verify that all safety contactors are closed (Contactors and Pneumatic / Hydraulic Safety Valves are energised.)

  • Verify all emergency stop pushbuttons are released, and door switches are in a safe state

  • Verify that Safety Relay is healthy.

  • Start the machine.

Testing Criteria for Safety Related Control Systems

Phase 3 - Predictable failure testing

Fault testing Analysis of Safety Control System

    Emergency Stops & Lanyard Switches
  • Device ID

Testing Criteria

  • As per AS 4024-2:2012 (EN ISO 13849-2:2012)

  • Emergency Stops & Lanyard Switches SRPCS Testing

  • Cross Short Test Result

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Input Channel Loss Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • 24Vdc intrusion Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Earth Fault Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Interlock Switches
  • Device ID

  • What type of switch is this?

Testing Criteria

  • As per AS 4024-2:2012 (EN ISO 13849-2:2012)

  • Interlock Switches SRPCS Testing

  • Cross Short Test Result

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Input Channel Loss Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • 24Vdc intrusion Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Earth Fault Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • ESPE Validation
  • Device ID

Testing Criteria

  • As per AS 4024-2:2012 (EN ISO 13849-2:2012)

  • What type of ESPE are used on this machinery?

  • Are safety stopping distances correct to prevent reaching the hazard? See standards such as AS4024:2801 for guidance

  • Details of any limitations preventing correct placement with respect to AS4024:2801 or schedule action for relocation.

  • Compliant

  • Are safety devices mounted correct height above the floor or conveyor to protect against unauthorized entry - see ISO13855:2010 and AS4024:2801 for guidance

  • Details of any limitations preventing correct placement with respect to AS4024:2801 or schedule action for relocation.

  • Compliant

  • Are ESPE's selected the correct type for the application?

  • Is muting required on this set up

  • Muting testing required

  • ESPE Testing

  • Removal of OSSD test

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Removal of Output Channel test<br>

  • Details of failure

  • RESET & Feedback circuit testing
  • Device ID

Testing Criteria

  • RESET feedback circuit testing

  • Removal of feedback Test Result

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Short circuit of feedback Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Short circuit of RESET Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Complementary Measures (other than ESTOPs)
  • Device ID

Testing Criteria

  • As per AS 4024-2:2012 (EN ISO 13849-2:2012) & EN574 III

  • Complementary Safety Measures Used?

  • For testing Two Hand Controls or Hold to Run Enable switches

  • Machine does not start when tested like this

  • When one switch is released the machine stops

  • Simultaneity validation testing results

  • Hold down test validation results

  • Establish safe conditions and record test

  • Confirm the Performance Level of the machinery as tested?

  • Does this meet the requirement for the client and this type of machinery per standards?

  • Confirm the Performance Level from the OEM / Integrator

  • What if any improvements need to be made to establish the correct Performance Level

  • Can the machinery be operated safely as tested?

  • What immediate actions are recommended to allow machinery operation

Validation Sign Off

Confirmation of Validation Result

  • Overall Validation Testing Result

  • Refer to action items list.

  • Re-validated following completeion of action items

  • Signed

  • Validated By

  • Signature

  • Validated By

  • Signature

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.