Information

  • Machinery Safety - Validation

  • Document No.

  • Client

  • Site

  • Customer Site

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

Executive Summary

Executive Summary

Scope of this Document

Objective and Scope

Validation

Standards Referenced in this document

Testing of SRPCS

Revision

  • Revision Reason

  • By whom

Phase 1 - Mechanical & Integrated Safeguards

Documentation Reviewed

  • Risk Assessment reviewed

  • Are there Functional Safety Descriptions (FSDs) available?

Check with OEM for pre start checklists of safety functions. They should be reasonably expected to share this along with the Functional Safety Descriptions

  • Is an SRS available?

  • Is there a SISTEMA report or similar?

  • Are pre-start commissioning checklists available?

  • Is there residual risk identified in the risk assessment.

  • For safety PLC and Configurable Safety Systems - is there an SSRS or similar documentation?

  • Documentation List
  • Document Type

  • Document Number

  • Machine Identification
  • Type of Machinery

  • Basic machine operation

  • Photo

  • Installation type

  • Manufacturer of Machine

  • Machine Model Number

  • Machine Serial Number

  • Machinery Safeguarding Analysis
  • Area of machine:

Guarding is Compliant when (According to ISO14119) guard fixings are considered tamperproof and robust enough to withstand tampering.

  • Safeguards are required on this machine.

  • Type of Safeguards

  • Safeguards selected are the appropriate type for the process

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • Safeguards are fixed in place, secured by appropriate fixings, and correctly interlocked.

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • All identified gaps are considered compliant

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • Safeguards prevent access to dangerous moving parts.

  • Detail Recommended Actions

Supervision of all tools required to open guards is strongly recommended. Operators and cleaners for example should not have uncontrolled access. FLM or local supervisor should retain and log usage of such tools for verification (incident management). It is normal for maintenance to have access to such tools.

  • A tool is required to remove existing guarding.

  • Is there a permit system in place prior to the removal of guarding. (Safe System of Work)

  • Conveyors Only

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • Conveyors are designed to be compliant with AS 4024-1310 & 12 & EN 619-2021

All electrical cabinets, MCC's DB's and control boxes must be securely fitted with covers and locked at all times such that only certified electrical personnel have access. Per AS/NZS 3000:2008

  • Are all electrical fixtures are covered and locked.

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • Machinery has integrated safeguarding (eg two-handed or hold-to-run jog operation) allowing operation through guards [not whole of body access]

  • See details in Predictable Failure Testing of Complementary Safety Functions

  • Walkways, platforms, self-closing gates and guard rails are used to allow safe access to machinery?

  • Are they compliant?

  • Detail Recommended Actions

  • Wherever possible all monitoring, adjustment or maintenance points should located outside the guarded area to allow safe maintenance. Every effort should be made to locate points in safe areas but it is not always achievable.

  • Is LOTO isolation present on the machinery and where possible located outside of the guarded or hazardous areas?

  • LOTO devices are located within proximity of the device to isolate or in a logical position.

  • Does the site have robust LOTO procedures documented.

Types of Isolation present

  • Electrical Isolator is fitted

  • Pneumatic Isolator is fitted

  • Hydraulic Isolator is fitted

  • Steam Isolator is fitted

  • Water Isolator is fitted

  • Gas Isolation is fitted

Phase 2 - Safety Controls System Validation

    Phase 2 Validation of the Logic System
  • Safety Logic Subsystems on this machinery.

  • Logic Device ID

  • Type of safety logic

  • Safety PLC and Configurable Relay Subsystems comprises of

undefined

  • Mechanical damage not present on the device.

  • All the safety logic devices securely mounted (DIN rail or screw base etc)

  • All the connections to the safety devices secure?

  • Installation is IP2X

  • EMC mitigation is considered for safety installation

  • Is there an SSRS available or evidence of safety software fault checking.

  • How has the software been checked for errors and systematic failures?

  • What is the highest PL that can achieved by this Safety Logic Subsystem

  • PL actual may meets or exceed PLr (PL required)

  • PL actual may not meet PLr (PL required)

undefined

  • Mechanical damage not present on the device.

  • All the safety logic devices securely mounted (DIN rail or screw base etc)

  • All the connections to the safety devices secure?

  • Installation is IP2X

  • EMC mitigation is considered for safety installation

Machinery Normal Operation

  • Verify that the Machine can be placed into a ready-to-run condition

  • Initial Condition: Machine is Idle - contractors open , drives off

  • Verify that all safety contactors are closed (Contactors and Pneumatic / Hydraulic Safety Valves are energised.)

  • Verify all emergency stop pushbuttons are released, and door switches are in a safe state

  • Verify that Safety Logic Subsystem is healthy.

  • Start the machine.

  • Normal Operation Confirmed

Phase 3 - Predictable failure testing

Fault testing Analysis of Safety Control System

    Emergency Stops & Lanyard Switches
  • Device ID

  • Actuator and background colour is compliant (As per EN ISO13850 - Red Twist to release / latching actuator with a yellow background for contrast for identification and colour blindness.)

  • Located correctly as per risk assessment.

  • ESTOP Shroud is fitted ( as per EN ISO13850, a shroud can only be allowed in specific scenarios where it is impossible to put the switch in a location where nuisance tripping cannot occur)

  • Recommended Actions to rectify

Testing Criteria - as far as possible, all reasonable tests are carried out on safety devices. Some tests cannot be done for technical reasons: for example - no test pulses are used on Safety PLC dual channel inputs - and no cross-short testing can be achieved. Magnetic safety switches will not be tested for cross shorts either - even with test pulses as this test can permanently damage most of these type of non-contact switches.

  • As per AS 4024-2:2012 (EN ISO 13849-2:2012)

  • Lanyard ESTOP Testing

  • Lanyard ESTOP Installation

  • Emergency Stops & Lanyard Switches SRPCS Testing

  • Cross Short Test Result

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Input Channel Loss Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • 24Vdc intrusion Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Earth Fault Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Interlock Switches
  • Device ID

  • What type of switch is this?

  • Interlock has fault exclusion for mechanical failure of actuator

Testing Criteria - as far as possible, all reasonable tests are carried out on safety devices. Some tests cannot be done for technical reasons: for example - no test pulses are used on Safety PLC dual channel inputs - and no cross-short testing can be achieved. Magnetic safety switches will not be tested for cross shorts either - even with test pulses as this test can permanently damage most of these type of non-contact switches.

  • As per AS 4024-2:2012 (EN ISO 13849-2:2012)

  • Interlock Switches SRPCS Testing

  • Cross Short Test Result

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Input Channel Loss Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • 24Vdc intrusion Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Earth Fault Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • ESPE Validation
  • Are Presence Sensing Devices used on this machinery?

  • Device ID

Testing Criteria - as far as possible, all reasonable tests are carried out on safety devices. Some tests cannot be done for technical reasons: for example - no test pulses are used on Safety PLC dual channel inputs - and no cross-short testing can be achieved. Magnetic safety switches will not be tested for cross shorts either - even with test pulses as this test can permanently damage most of these type of non-contact switches.

  • As per AS 4024-2:2012 (EN ISO 13849-2:2012)

  • What type of ESPE are used on this machinery?

  • Are safety stopping distances correct to prevent reaching the hazard? See standards such as AS4024:2801 for guidance

  • Details of any limitations preventing correct placement with respect to AS4024:2801 or schedule action for relocation.

  • Compliant

  • Are safety devices mounted correct height above the floor or conveyor to protect against unauthorised entry - see ISO13855:2010 and AS4024:2801 for guidance.

  • Details of any limitations preventing correct placement with respect to AS4024:2801 or schedule action for relocation.

  • Compliant

  • Are ESPE's selected the correct type for the application?

  • Is muting required on this set up

  • Muting testing required

  • ESPE Testing

  • Removal of OSSD test

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Removal of Output Channel test

  • Details of failure

  • Complementary Measures (other than ESTOPs)
  • Are Complementary measures used on this machinery?

  • Device ID

Testing Criteria

  • Complementary Safety Measures Used?

  • As per AS 4024-2:2012 (EN ISO 13849-2:2012) & EN574 III

  • For testing Two Hand Controls or Hold to Run Enable switches

  • Machine does not start when tested like this

  • When one switch is released the machine stops

  • Simultaneity validation testing results

  • Hold down test validation results

  • Guards are locked until safe speed or standstill detected

  • Ensure guards are locked when machinery started

  • Record time delay if safe timer is included (ms)

  • Establish safe conditions and record test

  • Final switching devices
  • What types of FSD are used

  • FSD Device ID's

Testing Criteria

EN 61810-3 Relays with forcibly guided contacts. Contactors are considered for use in safety circuits if they are compliant force-guided contacts. Mechanical guiding (forced guiding) makes it impossible to simultaneously close the normally closed and normally open contact. If a normally closed contact becomes welded, it must be impossible for the normally open contacts to close when the coil is energised. If a normally open contact becomes welded, it must be impossible for the normally closed contacts to close when the coil is de-energized also known as forced contacts, positively activated contacts, guided contacts, and linked contacts. This Forced-guided contact feature is primarily required for Safety circuits and redundant control systems. STO Drives and devices using safety over ethernet are not tested, but logic is determined in the Safety PLC or Controller.

  • Removal of feedback Test Result

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • RESET Devices
  • RESET Device ID

  • Type of RESET

Testing Criteria

STO Drives and devices using safety over ethernet are not tested, but logic is determined in SSRS.

  • RESET feedback circuit testing

  • Removal of feedback Test Result

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Short circuit of feedback Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

  • Short circuit of RESET Test Results

  • Details of failure and remedial action required.

Main Points for the Functional Safety validation

  • Confirm the Performance Level of the machinery as tested?

  • Confirm the Performance Level from the OEM / Integrator

  • Does this meet the requirement for the client and this type of machinery per standards?

  • What if any improvements need to be made to establish the correct Performance Level

  • Can the machinery be operated safely as validated?

  • What immediate actions are recommended to allow machinery operation

Validation Sign Off

Confirmation of Validation Result

  • Overall Validation Testing Result

  • Refer to action items list.

  • Re-validated following completeion of action items

  • Signed

  • Signature

  • Signature

  • Alistair Keenan

  • Consulting Director - KTSM

  • Certified Functional Machinery Safety Engineer

  • Certified Functional Process Safety Engineer

  • HAZOP Leader

  • EEHA Hazardous Area Classification and Design

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.