Information

  • Audit Title

  • Conducted by:

  • Signature:

  • Date of Audit:

  • List of Auditees:

  • Report agreed & authorised by :

  • Name:

  • Signature / date:

  • Title :

  • 2.1 Painting / Dry Film Coatings

  • Other list:

  • 2.2 Application Methods

  • 2.3 Paint System Types

  • 2.4 Curing Methods

3. Painting and Dry Film Coatings

  • 3.1 Are pre cleaning and pre treatment procedures documented on shop paper?

  • 3.2 Is verification of cleaning performed and documented prior to paint / film application?

  • 3.3 Are prepared surfaces protected prior to paint / film application?

  • 3.4 Are there procedures for controlling time between surface preparation and coating application, when required by customer / specification?

  • 3.4.1 When a time limit between surface preparation and coating application are required by the customer or specification is there a procedure that defines required surface reprocessing if this time limit is exceeded?

  • 3.5 Is Paint / film material purchased to customer approval or qualified products list?

  • 3.6 Does material have traceable certificate of conformance?

  • 3.7 Is there a procedure for shelf life control?

  • 3.8 Is there evidence in the shop that shelf life control is carried out?

  • 3.8.1 Is there a documented procedure for Re-qualification and / or disposal of material?

  • 3.8.2 Are records retained of Re-qualified materials and test results?

  • 3.9 Are materials stored under appropriate temperature environment controlled conditions?

  • 3.10 Is the addition of thinner controlled by viscosity and / or mix ratio, as required by customer / specification / technical data sheet?

  • 3.11 Is viscosity of the coating material checked and documented prior to use?

  • 3.12 Are there procedures for proper agitation (shaking) and mixing of materials including agitation time, mixing ratios, mixing order and mixing time?

  • 3.13 Is mixing time recorded and traceable to the job?

  • 3.14 Are pot life and induction time recorded and traceable to the job?

  • 3.15 Is material applied traceable to the hardware to which it was applied and recorded on shop paper?

  • 3.16 Is spray equipment cleanliness maintained including guns, cups, feed lines, etc?

  • 3.17 Are coating application areas e.g spray booths, racking areas, masking areas, drying areas, controlled to minimise contamination?

  • 3.18 Are grit blasting and coating spray equipment segregated?

  • 3.19 Are required and actual drying times between coats and to final cure documented on shop paper, recorded and traceable to the job?

  • 3.20 Are there procedures to assure that relative humidity and / or temperature meet manufacturer or customer requirements during application and air cure?

  • 3.21 Do records show that relative humidity and temperature meet requirements defined by procedure?

  • 3.22 Is there an individual identified to determine that environmental conditions in the shop are suitable for coating as described above?

  • 3.23 Are procedures / shop papers and controls in place to perform burnishing after curing of coating in accordance with customer / specification requirements?

4.0 Lot and periodic testing for Paint and Dry Film Coatings

  • 4.1 Are thickness test results and methods documented on shop paper?

  • 4.2 Are adhesion test results and methods documented on shop paper?

  • 4.3 Is Paint certification traceable to the specific colour / gloss requirement?

  • 4.3.1 Does the colour and / or gloss of the applied coating meet customer requirement?

  • 4.3.2 Are Paint colour and / or gloss standards available?

  • 4.4 Solvent Resistance Test

  • Tap to enter information
  • 4.4.1 Is there an internal procedure covering this test method that identifies the specification to which it is compliant?

  • 4.4.2 Is the person doing the testing identified as trained / competent to do the test?

  • 4.4.3 Is the test carried out at the required frequency?

  • 4.4.4 Is testing performed in accordance with the applicable specification?

  • 4.4.5 Is the correct Solvent used for the test?

  • 4.4.6 Does the person performing the test use the correct Solvent exposure technique?

  • 4.4.6.1 For Solvent rub test does operator use correct Solvent saturation, pressure, rubbing cycles or times.?

  • 4.4.6.2 For Solvent immersion test is the specimen exposed for the correct times and temperatures?

  • 4.4.7 Does the test procedure specify accept / reject criteria?

  • 4.4.8 Do test reports / certs show evidence of review, compliance to specification or correct retesting / replacement testing or customer notification?

  • 4.4.9 If testing is sub-contracted is the laboratory listed on the suppliers approved supplier list and is it approved by customer if required?

  • 5.0 Infrared Heat Cure

  • 6.0 Chemical Process Job Audit Of Painting / Dried Film Lubricant

6.1 Job Audit

6.1.1 Job Identity - job audit of

  • 6.1.1 Job Identity - job audit of

  • 6.1.1.1 Part Description

  • 6.1.1.2 Part No

  • 6.1.1.3 Customer

  • 6.1.1.4 Prime Contractor

  • 6.1.1.5 Po/Rev Level

  • 6.1.1.6 Part Quantity

  • 6.1.1.7 Serial/Lot No

  • 6.1.1.8 Date of job / job number

  • 6.1.1.9 Alloy/Heat Treat Condition/Hardness

  • 6.1.1.10 Processing Spec

  • 6.1.1.11 other PO Requirements

6.1.2 Paperwork review

  • 6.1.2.1 are part no, specs, and rev levels flowed down correctly?

  • 6.1.2.1.1 Are frozen processes identified and if so has customer approval been obtained?

  • 6.1.2.1.2 If a follow on order, have PO requirements been reviewed for change?

  • 6.1.2.2 Are processing and inspection test requirements flowed down correctly?

  • 6.1.2.3 Does the shop paper provide the following?

  • 6.1.2.3.1 Traceable part identification?

  • 6.1.2.3.2 All processing steps identified including procedure numbers as applicable

  • 6.1.2.3.3 All inspection and test requirements identified

  • 6.1.2.3.4 All relevant variable data from process parameters controlled by operator recorded on shop paper or traceable to job in shop records

  • 6.1.2.3.5 All inspection and test results recorded on shop paper or traceable in shop records

  • 6.1.2.3.6 All operations, inspections and tests done in sequence recorded or traceable to specific process line/workstations, operator/inspector/technician and date done

  • 6.1.2.3.7 All rework operations documented

  • 6.1.2.3.8 All test coupons identified and traceable to specific pieces/lots. Coupons processed through all processing steps on piece/lots they represent including pre- and post cycles and/or mechanical cleaning and thermal cycles

  • 6.1.2.3.9 Are coupons processed through all processing steps with pieces / lots they represent; including per-and post process chemical and / or mechanical cleaning and thermal cycles?

  • 6.1.2.3.10 All process, test and inspection equipment calibrated and traceable to part shop documents

6.1.3 Process observations

  • 6.1.3.1 Recieving,paperwork generation, requirement review and Recieving inspection

  • 6.1.3.2 Pre-process cleaning (Record n/a if not required)

  • 6.1.3.3 Pre-thermal operations (record n/a if none required)

  • 6.1.3.4 Time limits between preparation and coating application (record time limits or none required)

  • 6.1.3.5 Re-processing due to exceeding time between surface preparation and painting performed per int procedure and according to customers spec? (record method or none if no rework observed)

  • 6.1.3.6 Masking (record n/a if none required)

  • 6.1.3.7 Do Paint materials meet specification / technical data sheet requirements and are materials within shelf life? Note: Auditor to include Paint manufacturer, material designation and batch for each component.

  • 6.1.3.8 Does paint mixing and application meet specification / technical data sheet requirements?

  • 6.1.3.9 Processing (record n/a if none required)

  • 6.1.3.10 Post process cleaning (record n/a if none required)

  • 6.1.3.11 Post processing thermal operations (record n/a if none required)

  • 6.1.3.12 Final inspection

  • 6.1.3.13 Packing and shipping

  • 6.1.3.14 Solution and/or material testing

  • 6.1.3.15 Periodic and/or lot testing (record testing done e.g lot, visual, thickness. Monthly - salt spray, coating weight etc)

6.1.4 Lot acceptance testing/inspection

  • 6.1.4.1 Does the definition of "Lot" as established by the supplier conform to the definition outlined by the spec

  • 6.1.4.2 Were parts shipped before completion of lot testing only with specific customer authorisation

  • 6.1.4.3 Did the sampling plan meet spec and/or customer requirements

  • 6.1.4.4 Was hardware held pending resolution of nonconformances noted during testing

  • 6.1.4.5 Was lot testing required

  • 6.1.4.6 Was lot testing preformed and documented

  • 6.1.4.7 Was lot testing in conformance with spec with and/or customer requirements

6.1.5 Operator control and job acceptance

  • 6.1.5.1 List the operators who preformed processing operations

  • 6.1.5.2 Are the operators trained and approved

  • 6.1.5.3 Are all operations, inspections and tests properly signed off or stamped and dated as required, by the correct operator or department

  • Describe

  • 6.1.5.4 Does all processing, testing, and inspection conform to requirements

6.1.6 Certification and reports or test reports

  • 6.1.6.1 Does certification show compliance to all the requirements and reflect actual data as required

  • 6.1.6.2 Does this job comply with all requirements ?

  • 6.1.6.3 Certificate or test report no (NA if certificate raised after audit completed)

  • 6.1.6.4 Certificate or test report date

Report of Audit findings

  • Number of majors

  • Tap to enter information
  • Details:

  • Number of minors

  • Tap to enter information
  • Details:

  • Number of Observations

  • Tap to enter information
  • Details:

Audit Summary

  • Details :

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.