Title Page
Pre-inspection preparation:
-
Pollution incident risk assessment (PIRA). The PIRA must be updated as part of the inspection. It can be completed before or after the visit. When updating the PIRA, take into account any environmental records on Sphera from the previous year and also findings from the environmental inspection. Speak to the Environmental manager or Degree Apprentice for instructions on how to update the PIRA if you are unsure.
-
If the operational site is being operated & maintained by an external contractor (GE, SGRE, Enercon, Wartsila are all examples) Contact them in advance of the visit to obtain: evidence of environmental spill response training and evidence of waste management (if this is in their contract to manage). Examples include certificates of completion for training, material used to deliver training and waste management paperwork.
-
Operational site name and location
-
Date the environmental inspection was conducted on.
-
People completing or participating in the inspection:
-
Has there been any Sphera Environmental Records since the previous inspection. If so, do they need to be reviewed during this check?
Planning and consents:
-
Has the 'operational sites compliance matrix' been changed to reflect current activity relating to planning commitments? Please summarise.
- yes, the site's matrix has been reviewed.
- no, the compliance matrix for this site should be reviewed and updated to match its planning commitments.
- not applicable, the site does not have or need a compliance matrix.
-
Does the site have active habitat/landscape and/or ornithological monitoring?
- Yes, continue to complete this section
- No, move onto the next section.
-
Please tick all monitoring that applies:
- Ornithological monitoring
- Peatland monitoring
- Forestry monitoring
- Landscape monitoring
- Bat monitoring
- Habitat creation monitoring
- Marine life monitoring
- not applicable, no monitoring is required.
-
Out of the above list can any be practically assessed on site and/or via desk review? If an assessment can take place, summarise findings here.
Control building:
Solvents and Chemicals (PV Cleaner and Paints)
-
Are there any solvents/chemicals stored on-site. (Usually store inside of a shipping container or COSHH Locker)
- Yes there are solvents and/or chemicals being stored on site.
- N/A, There are no solvents or chemicals being stored on site.
-
If so, are all solvents and/or chemicals being stored appropriately and in good condition?
- All fluids on site (solvents and chemicals) are being stored inside a building in the correct containment method e.g. a container with no signs of wear and they all have their correct lids on.
- For the most part, all fluids on site are being stored ok, with only a few items missing a lid or are slightly worn.
- Most fluids and chemicals are not being stored appropriately and show evidence of pollution/leaking causing stains on site.
- N/A, there are no solvents or chemicals present on site.
-
Describe any solvents or chemicals found and attach a photograph. e.g. includes panel cleaning solutions and paints. Type N/A if there are none present.
Waste:
-
Is there any waste storage facilities on site?
- Yes, there is waste stored on site
- No, there is no waste storage on site
-
If so, are the waste storage facilities in good condition?
- The waste facilities are in good condition and there is no evidence of poor waste management.
- The waste facilities are in poor condition and some waste is escaping into the environment.
-
Is there any evidence of waste/spare panels on site?
- There is no evidence of stored waste/spare panels on site
- There are waste panels on site and they are being dealt with
- There are waste panels on site and they are not being dealt with/have been left abandoned.
F-gas:
-
is there an air conditioning unit at the control building? If so list all units and take photos of their specification stickers.
-
If applicable, have units been inspected in line with F-gas regulations?
- No, the register is not completed and volumes are not obtained
- yes volumes are obtained, but the register is not yet completed.
- Yes volumes are obtained and register is completed.
-
Does the operational site have SF6 located in switchegear?
-
If the above question is yes, has the site's SF6 register been completed along with required leak tests?
- No, the register is not completed and volumes are not obtained
- yes volumes are obtained, but the register is not yet completed.
- Yes volumes are obtained and register is completed.
Operational site surroundings water: pollution and/or silt risk:
-
Is drainage present that would pose a pollution risk?
- No, there is no drainage present on site that poses a pollution risk.
- Yes, there is drainage on site that could pose a pollution risk if not managed.
-
If drainage is present, identify the best means of environmental risk reduction: identifying surface/foul vs. full drainage plan; drain covers on site are examples.
-
Are chemical & oil stores controlled in a manner to prevent pathways to drains? If 'no' then utilise the next section to make improvements & suggestions.
- yes, housekeeping and site conditions are in order and poses little risk to drainage.
- housekeeping and site conditions is sufficient but should be improved in some examples to protect drainage.
- housekeeping and site conditions is in poor condition and poses a risk to pollute via drain pathways.
- Not applicable as there is no drainage and/or oil chemical stores or site conditions to impact drains.
-
If there is no drainage plan, would the operational site benefit from one?
- Drainage Plan would be beneficial to control pollution risk
- A drainage plan would not be beneficial (no outside drains in vicinity of the control building and/or it is clear where drains go).
-
If applicable, is the drainage plan visible and easily accessed?
- yes, the drainage plan is visible and easily accessed (explain how)
- no the drainage plan is not visible or easily accessed
- Not applicable as there is no drainage
-
Watercourses: If practical, check for presence of silt. If silt is present, assess potential root causes, identify location on the printed map and take a photograph. Depending on circumstances this may be Sphera recordable.
- Silt is present and is a pollution risk. Sphera recordable.
- Watercourse(s) was checked and no presence of silt
- Not applicable as no watercourses on site or could not check.
-
Please describe here any concerns on the operational site regarding water pollution risk. (e.g. blocked culverts). If there is no specific concern, write not applicable.
Operational site surroundings: soil/unmade ground pollution risk / exterior check of assets
Environmental near hits & incidents:
-
Pollutant that has escaped containment (e.g. transformer) but not entered the environment (soil/water).
- Yes, Record on Sphera
- No
-
Pollutant that has escaped into the environment to soil. Example: Stains/liquids present on the soil/ground.
-
Pollutant that has escaped into the environment to watercourse. Example: Discolouration of the watercourse (that can be practically accessed).
-
Waste that has escaped into the environment (e.g. litter).
-
Deliberate fly tipping
-
Plant die back due/likely due to presence of pollution.
-
Evidence of fires (black patches on soil, items that have been burnt)
-
Dead wildlife, marine life, archaeological concerns present.
-
Is there any evidence of damage to the panels or connecting infrastructure on site?
Transformer Inspection
-
Enter the number of Transformers present on site
-
Make sure to sample at least 10% of the transformers on site and answer the following questions.
-
Are the sampled transformer(s) in good condition?
-
Are the sampled transformer(s) housed correctly? If they do not have housing consider whether it is necessary based on pollution risk and water ingress.
-
Is any evidence of damage to the transformer/housing of the transformer?
-
Environmental Inspection Summary
-
Please summarise the environmental inspection and include any findings not identified in the checklist items.