Home
Manufacturing
P28A-AL-0002 Rev M Audit Checklist Rev 001
P28A-AL-0002 Rev M Audit Checklist Rev 001
Jun Tang

P28A-AL-0002 Rev M Audit Checklist Rev 001

P28A-AL-0002 Audit Revision 6/29/2016

Use this Template
Print as PDF
graphic of a hand making an okay sign ×

Free P28A-AL-0002 Rev M Audit Checklist Rev 001 Checklist

Use this Template

标题页

  • Audit Title

  • Enter Supplier Name

  • Enter Supplier GSL#-Loc Code

  • Enter Supplier Contact Name

  • Enter Supplier Contact eMail

  • Enter Supplier Contact Phone

  • Prepared by

  • Supplier Address

  • Date

  • eSMS Audit #

General Info

  • Enter Latest eSMS/PLM Qualification #

  • Enter Scope of Audit

  • Previous audit number on same Product:

  • Is the supplier ISO Certified? If so, enter the date of Certificate Expiration

Overall

  • Does Supplier have all the applicable specs mentioned in 2.1.1 and 2.1.2?(2.1)

  • Does the applicable specs with the latest revision? (2.1)

  • Does supplier use the correct order of precedence when conflict between documents?(2.2)

  • Does supplier know the role of different GE team (SQE, sourcing representative, responsible engineer)(3.1)

  • Does supplier know if the parts they supply to GE are build to print or build to specification?(3.2)

  • For the build to specification parts, is there a clear process in supplier how to design the parts per the spec and how to get GE approval?(3.2.2)

Quality System

  • Is supplier certified by ISO 9001 or equivalent standard? (4.2.1)

Special Process

  • Does supplier have specific, documenteed and controlled procedures for all the special process perfomed on GE Power Part?(4.2.2)

  • Does the special process CTPs/CTQs identified clearly and monitored acordingly?(4.2.2)

  • Are the operators for the special processes trained and qualified to do the job?(4.2.2)

  • Is the training plan specified and the performance of the individual checked on regular basis (4.2.2)

Record Rentention

  • Does supplier have a writtend procedure for the documentation and retention of quality and product records for GE Power?(4.2.3)

  • Does supplier retend the record for min 10 years?(4.2.3)

  • Does the record include at least product quality, inspection, test plans and results, material specifications, qualification documentation and the COC?(4.2.3)

  • Is the specific component record specified by Power are done accordingly?(4.2.3)

  • Is the supplier storage means appropriate to meet the retention requirement and allow for timely retrieval of records?(4.2.3)

Supplier Approval

  • Is supplier approved with supplier code?(4.3)

  • Is the supplier qualified with the part and process with 6.2.3 form provided? (4.4)

  • Is the qualification done for the design or process change when the process, form or function of the product are changed? (4.4.1 (2))

  • Is the requalification done for the supplier or critical sub-tier changes its manufacturing location?(4.4.1(3))

  • Is the requalification done when the supplier current qualification are under questions when quality issues arise?(4.4.1(4))

  • Is drawing or design review done together with GE before the part manufacturing to ensure supplier understand the requirements?(4.4.2)

  • Is the sub-tier qualfificationn done by the suppllier?(4.4.3)

  • Is the qualification documents match what required in the table and QR?(4.4.5)

  • Is the MPP contain the mimum information with revision history and review by GE?(4.4.6)

  • Is the MPP "frozen" based on the qualification requirement?(4.4.6)

  • Does PQP contain the minimum information and approved by GE?(4.4.7)

  • Is PQP submitted and approved by SQE and treated as quality document with revision control by supplier?(4.4.7)

  • During PQP exection, are the completion of each inspection and test be accompanied by approprite sign off documentation?(4.4.7)

  • Are all the CTQs being identified and verified through PQP?(4.4.7)

  • Does CAV include identification of components, charateristics and feature accountability, the inspection and test results and production product acceptance criteria?(4.4.8)

  • Does supplier follow the level of inspection and product acceptance requirement determined and specified on the CAV for the production components? If not, are there any approval from GE?(4.4.8)

  • Does 6.2.3 filed well in supplier with correct understanding for qualified items and the restriction of the qual? (4.4.9)

  • Does FPCR approved beofre the special process change or sub-tier change?(4.4.10)

  • Is the SDR approved for the shipping the parts prior to qualification approval?(4.4.11)

  • Is supplier signed up and can recive the email notification for the new and revised specifications?(4.5.1.1)

  • Does supplier implement spec revisions on existing and future PO excep the parts are already in manufacturing?(4.5.1.2)

  • Does supplier inform GE for the required witness and inspection of the parts in advance?(4.5.2)

SDR

  • Does supplier submit all the deviations through SDR to GE? (alternate materials, processes, correct drawing/documentation errors or emissions and other deviations to the PO requirements)(4.5.3.1 a. h)

  • Does supplier ship the parts before the SDR is cleared or closed?(4.5.3.1 b.)

  • Is the submitted SDR containing detailed description, containment, probable source and proposed remedial action?(4.5.3.1 c.)

  • Does supplier perform the repair on the deviation pior to disposition by GE?(4.5.3.1 d.)

  • Is the SDR just "one time" exceptions to GE requirements?(4.5.3.1 e.)

  • Is the approved SDR applied only to the PO's listed on the SDR?(4.5.3.1 f.)

  • Is RFI submitted for the drawing clarifications?(4.5.3.1 j.)

  • Does supplier not use approved RFI as the granted approval for shipping the deviation parts?(4.5.3.1 j.)

  • Is the sub-tier deviation SDR submitted through the primary supplier?(4.5.3.1 k.)

  • Is the SDR provided with complete deviation where appropriate including drawing number, material spec, special process, inspectioon results, the samples or photos when applicalbe, the number of defecst, specific PO numbers, the serial numbers, the estimated time to make correct and cost related issues?(4.5.3.2)

  • is the process capability charts and datasets provided as requested by GE representatives?(4.5.3.2.1)

  • Is the serial numbers identified for the serialized parts on SDR and PO number identified for the non serialized parts?(4.5.3.2.2)

  • Does supplier treat UVC as deviation and submit in SDR unless supplier notifies GE in advance including how the material is deemed atypical of conforming material, attached the picture, the reason for the deviation and the substantiation of cases where supplier considers the UVC to be acceptable for us?(4.5.3.2.3)

Containment

  • Is immediate containment done with all parts affected being contained when a non-conformance is discovered (4.5.3.3)

  • Are all inventory be evaluated when the nonconformance is discovered during random audit?(4.5.3.3.)

  • Is the isolation and insulation properly done to control the risk related to the nonconformance and the documentation for the supplier's efforts are documented for verification of the control for its processese 9n pre-production, production and post-production)(4.5.3.3)

  • Are the probable sources provided considering the situations involving same or similar cases, the enviornment conditions, the trends assotiated with equipment performance, the cause code and deviation category?(4.5.3.4)

  • Does supplier provide rework or repair plan for deviating parts prior to disposition and provide recommended disposition for rework, repair or "accept as is"?(4.5.3.5)

  • is the approved SDR copy provided along the parts in shipment and additional markings or "Green tas" are used when requested by the SQE?(4.5.3.6)

  • Is the formal root cause analysis done and accepted through validation by GE when required?(4.5.4)

Process Capability

  • is CTQ/CTP/KCP are measured and recorded and documented in PQP?(4.5.5)

  • Is regular analysis of the required data for process capability is done and send to SQE periorically?(4.5.5)

  • is the improvement projects done based on the process capability analysis and requested by GE?(4.5.5)

  • Is CTQ requiring process capability, the process to track and other specificatiions and drawings provided to the sub-tiers?(4.5.5)

  • Is the preventive maintenance plan established and implemented for product specific toolings including cleaning, inpsection, repari and small refurbishment)?(4.5.6)

Supplier Engineering Change Control

  • if the hardware is designed by supplier, is the "Supplier Engineering Change Control" completed per 398A1729?(5.1)

  • Is configuration management system implmented to ensure the control of engineering definition of the product beining developed, manufactured and supported in the field?(5.1.2.1)

  • Is BOM submitted as the first piece qualification?(5.1.2.2)

  • Is RDC (Request for Design Change) submitted to GE for approval prior to implementation?(5.1.2.3)

  • Do subtiers maintain configuration control on the componenets supplied and any design changes are approved via RDC's?(5.1.2.4)

  • Are the qualified BOM and subsequent RDC's maintained on file for review and audit by GE?(5.1.2.5)

  • Is the RDC submitted and dispotioned through SDR or equivalent identified by GE Power and not be implemented until appoval from GE?(5.3.1 & 5.3.3)

  • Is the approved design change documents and updated BOM maintained in recrods?(5.3.1)

  • Does supplier forward RDC to GE design engineer for disposition and the RDC and approved BOM were added in qualification records by SQE?(5.3.2)

  • are the records for the approved BOM, RDC submitted and GE's approval or rejection retained?(5.4)

  • Does supplier use the latest form for FPCR?(6.1)

  • Add signature

P28A-AL-0002 Rev M Audit Checklist Rev 001
Jun Tang

P28A-AL-0002 Rev M Audit Checklist Rev 001

P28A-AL-0002 Audit Revision 6/29/2016

Use this Template
The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.

Related checklists

SDJX finally inspection checklist_Rev:2
Jun Tang
SDJX finally inspection checklist_Rev:2
0 Downloads
back arrow for carousel
back arrow for carousel
iAuditor Logo Icon ©SafetyCulture 2022