Information

  • Document No.

  • Audit Title

  • Client / Site

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Location
  • Personnel

Section 1: Pre-Custody Transfer

  • 1.1 Was the inspector familiar with the sampling system arrangement?

  • 1.2 Did the inspector ensure that all sampling equipment was in fit condition?

  • 1.3 Did the inspector check that the sample system was in compliance with ISO 8943?

  • 1.4 Did the inspector coordinate/confirm analyser calibration?

  • 1.5 Was calibration gas certified and certificate noted?

  • 1.6 Was the calibration gas used for calibration within date?

Section 2: Vessel Measurement

  • 2.1 Did the inspector manually check the vessels draught readings?

  • 2.2 Did the inspector check the clinometer or otherwise check list manually?

  • 2.3 Did the inspector request that the vessel be made upright and even keel for measurement purposes?

  • 2.4 Did the inspector record the meter readings for engine room or other consumption of BOG?

  • 2.5 Were OCTM taken with vapour arms connected and prior to liquid arm cool down?

  • 2.6 Were CCTM taken immediately after line draining?

  • 2.7 Did the inspector note the type of level measurement devices?

  • 2.8 Did the inspector note the number and positions of the temperature measurement devices in each tank?

  • 2.9 Did the inspector view calibration certificates for all measurement devices?

  • 2.10 Did the inspector confirm the secondary measurement system by taking measurements on deck?

  • 2.11 Did the inspector check volumes from calibration tables?

  • 2.12 Did the inspector verify the Chief Engineers in port gas consumption calculations?

  • 2.13 Did the inspector use a note book to record all raw data?

Section 3: Sampling and Analysis

  • 3.1 Did the inspector take spot samples?

  • 3.2 Did the inspector note the pressure of the sampling system during sampling?

  • 3.3 were the sample cylinders adequately purged prior to sampling?

  • 3.4 were all samples drawn adequately labelled?

  • 3.5 Did the inspector periodically check the vapouriser for icing?

  • 3.6 Did the inspector periodically check the analyser results for stability?

  • 3.7 Was the sampling system checked for leaks?

  • 3.8 Did the inspector check that any gas holder used, held a sufficient amount to purge compressors, lines and fill sample cylinders?

  • 3.9 Did the sampling system and analysis method comply with the SPA?

  • 3.10 Did the inspector observe and report any inconsistencies in the sampling and analysis system?

  • 3.11 Does the inspector understand the principles of LNG sampling and analysis?

Section 4: Communication and Planning

  • 4.1 Did the inspector attend the ship / shore safety and operation meeting?

  • 4.2 Did the inspector discuss: a) cargo stowage on board, b) current or previous voyage transit losses c) delivery rates

  • 4.3 were signed and stamped copies of documents exchanged?

  • 4.4 Did the inspector discuss BP requirements with ship and shore staff?

Section 5: HSSE

  • 5.1 Was the inspector able to carry required equipment without compromising safety?

  • 5.2 Were samples transported to the laboratory or storage in a safe manner?

  • 5.3 Did the inspector show HSE awareness?

  • 5.4 Did the inspector comply with contractor entry regulations for the terminal?

  • 5.5 Did the inspector observe and report potentially hazardous operations?

  • 5.6 Was the PPE as worn by the inspector, appropriate to task?

  • 5.7 Did the inspector comply with requirements for use of electrical equipment, such as mobile phones and computers?

Section 6: Calculations

  • 6.1 Did the inspector manually calculate the quantity to verify custody transfer calculations?

  • 6.2 Does the computer program as used by the inspector show traceability to the required SPA?

  • 6.3 Were the calculations completed in a timely manner?

  • 6.4 Were quantities as calculated, checked with other voyage data to ensure consistency?

  • 6.5 Did the inspector also calculate to ISO 6578?

  • 6.6 Did the inspector compare the primary and secondary systems?

Section 7: Facilities and Operation

  • 7.1 Are there general safety rules applied within the inspection area?

  • 7.2 Are inspection staff given both task and facility specific HSSE training?

  • 7.3 Does the inspection office have any traceability for field equipment proving and maintenance?

  • 7.4 Did the inspector arrive in good time to avoid delays in either ship or shore operation?

  • 7.5 Has the inspection operation been accredited against an internationally recognised standard?

  • 7.6 Have all inspectors had IFIA training?

  • 7.7 Prior to the start of the job, is the inspector given a copy of all relevant client instructions?

  • 7.8 Does the office complete input into GCAS?

  • 7.9 Is the inspection report completed and despatched in a timely manner?

  • 7.10 Is there a formalised route for communicating product quality and quantity issues?

  • 7.11 Is communication between inspection office and client (direct or indirect) effective and reliable?

Section 8: Any Other Comments and Information

  • BP Cargo Assurance

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.