Information

  • Audit Title

  • Document No.

  • Client / Site

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Location
  • Personnel

Reported SEA - Audit Definition of a significant event; 'Any event thought by anyone in the team to be significant in the care of patients or the conduct of the practice''.

  • Start date of the SEA:

  • Add signature

Stage 1 - Awareness and prioritising a Significant Event Audit

  • Does the practice have a disignated person(s) who can be consulted to make a judgement on whether a specific significant event should be formally audited immediately, or be dealt with in a simpler way?

  • 1.1 -Name of designated person(s):

  • 1.2 - Description of the SEA:

  • 1.3 - SEA Category:

  • 1.4 - Could the incidence have been prevented?

Stage 2 - Information gathering

  • 2.1 - What happened (summary)?

  • 2.2 - How it happened:

  • 2.3 - Why it happened (summary):

  • 2.4 Evidence Collected:

  • 2.5 Evidence:

Stage 3 - The facilitated team-based meeting

  • 3.1 - Is the SEA part of the monthly practice meetings?

  • 3.2 - Is the meeting in addition to the routine practice meetings due to the urgency of the event?

  • 3.3 - Is there a named nominated facilitator?

  • 3.4 - Aims and process of the discussion:

  • 3.5 - Summary of Findings:

Stage 4 - Analysis of the significant event

  • 4.1 - What happened (in detail)?

  • 4.2 - Why did it happen (in detail)?

  • 4.2.1 - Main Reasons:

  • 4.2.2 - Underlying Reasons:

  • 4.3 - What has been learnt?

  • 4.4 - Did the event occur due to a lack of knowledge and training?

  • 4.5 - Could the event have been prevented if the system s and/or procedures?

  • 4.6 - Was the event due to a lack of team work?

  • 4.7 - Was the event due to a lack of effective communication?

  • 4.8 - Has the care and service provided been shown to be exemplary (eg team-based effort in the successful resuscitation of a patient)?

  • 4.9 - is no action required?

  • 4.10 - Has a learning need been highlighted?

  • 4.11 - Has a learning point been highlighted (eg a protocol which requires altering)?

  • 4.12 - Is a conventional audit required?

  • 4.13 - Is there a need for immediate action/change?

  • 4.14 - Is there a need for further investigation and an in-depth SEA required (eg in the event where multiple organisations are involved)?

  • 4.15 - is the information going to be shared?

  • Information to be shared with:

Stage 5 - Agree, implement and monitor change

  • 5.1 - What actions have been agreed upon?:

  • 5.2 - How and when will the changes be implemented?:

  • Select date

  • 5.3 - How will the changes be monitored?:

Stage 6 - Write it up

  • Additional information not already mentioned:

Stage 7 - Report, share and review

  • 7.1 - Is one or more of the following to receive a copy of this SEA?

  • 7.2 - How many of the following will be sent a copy?

  • 7.2.1 - Patient and/or carer?

  • 7.2.2 - Educational peer reviewers?

  • 7.2.3 - Care Quality Commission (CQC) Assessors/reviewers?

  • 7.2.4 - General Dental Practice (GDP) appraisers?

  • 7.2.5 - British Dental Association (BDA) Good Practice assessors?

  • 7.2.6 - Clinical governance assessors?

  • 7.2.7 - Primary Dental Care (PCT) Cluster assessor/advisor?

  • 7.2.8 - General Dental Council (GDC) assessor?

  • 7.2.9 - National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA)?

  • 7.2.10 - Health & Safety Executive?

  • 7.2.11 - National Radiographic Practice Board (NRPB)?

What was effective about this SEA:

Completed:

  • Select date

  • Add signature

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.