Information
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Client / Site
-
Conducted on
-
Personnel
-
Add location
-
WEIGHTING:
The weighting of each question is based on what the consequences will be. Each question is weighted as follows: 1 = minimal to no risk if criteria not met ~ 5 = extreme risk to health and equipment if criteria not met (risk is to safety, environment, equipment, $ and prosecution).
RATING:
Poor: Potential for an incident occurring. Major Non-Conformance to criteria - Immediate action required
Fair: General non-compliance with legislation/policies/procedures. Corrective action required within 48 hours
Accepted: Substantial compliance, however room for improvement. Minor issues noted - corrective action required within 5 days
Good: Satisfies legal and company requirements. Minor issue may be noted
Excellent: Excels in management of this criterion. No action
Criterion Not Applicable
1. Amenities and Offices
-
1.1 Company policies displayed (9 policies) and are signed and current
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.2 Emergency evacuation instructions poster displayed SF-3.2.14.5 and with correct layout
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.3 If You Are Injured poster displayed with B.E. contact
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.4 Emergency information poster displayed and up to date. SF-3.2.14.3
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.5 OHS & Emergency responsibilities poster displayed SF-3.2.14.4
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.6 Hazard, injury, incident, reporting procedure displayed SF-3.2.07.4
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.7 Injury reporting & rehabilitation procedure displayed SP-3.2.06.5
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.8 Project health and safety coordination plan displayed QF-4.3.02 showing correct project contacts
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.9 Site objectives and targets poster displayed SF-3.2.03.6
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
1.10 Site personnel log available and used SR-3.2.15.6
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
2. First aid and emergency planning
-
2.1 First aid and emergency assessment report completed SF-3.2.14.7
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
2.2 Emergency identification checklist completed SF-3.2.14.2
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
2.3 Emergency procedures / contact numbers etc on display near first aid kit. Lists current first aiders on site.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
2.6 Emergency evacuation drill completed in last three months using SF-3.2.14.10 form
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
2.7 First aid and emergency checklist completed SF-3.2.14.9 on commencement of project and 3-monthly thereafter.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
2.8 Project Emergency and Security Plan available SF-3.2.14.6 with evidence of induction by project personnel
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
2.9 Review Emergency Plan. Evaluate that it is valid and relevant to the project.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
2.10 Is there evidence that the Project Emergency Plan has been reviewed by the client/other stakeholders when working in occupied areas (eg schools, hospitals etc), such as references in meeting minutes, emails.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
3. IMS Records
-
3.1 Project IMS Plan available and contact details are current, signed off by the Project Manager SF-3.2.03.3
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.2 Site setup checklist completed QG-4.3.11
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.3 Site Induction and Site Safety Rules are available and specific to the site SG-3.2.05.6, SF-3.2.05.3 and current.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.4 Subcontractor Pre-Commencement Checklist completed for all trades on site SF-3.2.15.2
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
3.5 Subcontractor Evaluation Forms being competed using the QF-4.2.5 form and sent to the IMS Manager
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
3.6 Induction Checklist completed for all trades on site SF-3.2.15.4
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
3.7 Hard Hat induction stickers available and used
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.8 Incident reports completed and added to Procore as "Observations"
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
3.9 Toolbox meetings conducted at least weekly and items raised are closed out. Attendance recorded SF-3.2.06.2 and current minutes displayed on notice board or above Site Personnel Log.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.10 Site inspections conducted weekly and actions closed out online in Procore or SF-3.2.09.2. Signed off by Site Manager and items raised as an Observation on Procore and closed out in a timely manner.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.11 Evidence of subcontractor participation in site inspections (minimum of one attendance a month using different trades, looking over the entire site, not just their work area)
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.12 Procore Observations entered and appropriately closed out in a timely manner
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
3.13 SWMS Verification form completed for all high risk activities SF-3.2.01.5
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.14 Is the Project Risk Register relevant/specific to the project, and is it appropriate and effective?
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.15 Appropriate permits being used (hot works, roof access, confined space)
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.16 Evidence of Senior Management participation (eg in Procore inspections and Observations / toolbox meetings).
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
3.17 Task Observations completed for high risk activities (in Procore Inspections).
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
4. Electrical
-
4.1 Testing/tagging records available for RCD tests and B.E. tools
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
4.2 Certificates of Electrical Safety have been issued for all new connections (site sheds and temp boards).
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
5. Excavation works
-
5.1 All underground services located (Dial Before You Dig and services locator engaged, with services marked on the ground and/or marked up on drawings)
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
5.2 Soil clearance certificate available where required / contaminated soil treated appropriately. Usually required when industrial sites or potentially contaminated sites are redeveloped for residential use.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
5.3 Trench shoring systems have been designed/certified by a qualified engineer and installed by a qualified person
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
5.4 Any excavation support method, when not following the Trenching Code), has been outlined in drawings/plans or permits
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
6. Mobile Plant & Traffic Management
-
6.1 Plant inductions completed for all plant on site using the relevant forms SF-3.2.10.6 - SF-3.2.10.22 and all relevant records required to be copied are available in Folder 3- Plant Register Folder
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
6.2 Mobile and Major Plant Register includes all plant on site SR-3.2.10.4
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
6.3 Plant Weekly Inspection Checklist completed for plant on site for longer than a week SF-3.2.10.2
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
6.4 Traffic management plan available where required. Eg where road occupation occurs (taking up a lane or footpath for unloading, vehicles need to reverse in or out of site, or vehicles protruding out onto the road from the site).
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
6.5 Is there a SWMS available for traffic control and relevant workers inducted into it
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
6.6 Pedestrian Plan and Onsite Traffic Plan adequate. A pedestrian plan should be developed when working in different areas of occupied buildings such as hospitals/universities. Onsite traffic plans required when vehicles can drive around the site.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
7. Working at Heights
-
7.1 Is the SG-3.3.4.1 Hierarchy of Controls-Work At Heights poster displayed and used at induction
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
7.2 The Roof Access Permit is being used for accessing areas when higher level controls are not available or practicable, using the SF-3.2.01.10 form
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
7.3 The Harness Register is being filled out appropriately using the SR-3.2.10.15 form
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
7.4 Where suspended slabs are part of the structure, have the Formwork Assembly Checklist, Concrete Prepour Checklist and Formwork Stripping Checklists been used?
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
7.5 Handover certificates available for proprietary roof guardrails and scaffolds where a risk of a fall over 4m exists
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
7.6 Perimeter guardrail handover certificates available for guardrails installed by Bldg.Eng (eg yellow boots, metal stanchions)
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
7.7 Permanent harness anchor points have been designed, certified, and installed by a competent/trained person, and this is verified prior to being used. Existing anchor points have been inspected in the last 12 months.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
8. Demolition and Temporary Structures
-
8.1 Demolition work plan available
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
8.2 Evidence that existing services have been disconnected eg certificates of electrical safety for disconnections, plumbing isolations and other services
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
8.3 Any remaining "live" services visibly identified, and evidence that the locations of main isolators for power, gas etc are known
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
8.4 Hazardous material audit conducted and available.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
8.5 Any backpropping required to support mobile plant on a suspended deck has been designed and certified by a structural engineer
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
8.6 Any temporary support structure (temporary bracing of a wall or other existing structure, needling/propping, perimeter timber hoarding, overhead protection gantry) has been designed and certified by an engineer
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
8.7 Upon completion of erection, temporary support structures mentioned above have been signed off as erected as per the design
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
10.8 Temporary propping or temporary supports have been removed only after written authorisation has been obtained from the structural engineer
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
11. Asbestos
-
11.1 Asbestos removal control plan in place
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
11.2 Asbestos removalist has notified WorkSafe
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
11.3 Removalists are appropriately licensed
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
11.4 Asbestos removal site checklist has been completed SF-3.2.14.12
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
11.5 Air monitoring conducted and atmospheric test results available
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
11.6 Clearance certificates in place, displayed on notice board or discussed at toolbox meeting.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
12. Precast panel and steel erection
-
12.1 Panel birth certificates available (minimum 3 days old)
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
12.2 QF-4.09.05.6 Inspection and Test Plan for Precast Concrete Panels completed.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
12.3 Erection plan and propping plan available
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
12.4 Written approval from engineer obtained prior to the removal of props
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
12.5 Sequential Erection Procedure and marking plan available for steel erection
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
12.6 Crane lifting plans are available for precast panel and structural steel erection.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
12.7 An assessment of ground conditions has been documented, in relation to the positioning of crane outriggers (check mobile crane induction records)
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
Site Observation and Verification. Take the names of two random subcontractors (from different companies where possible) and answer the following questions. Also take down the details of any plant they are using and the name of any chemicals they're using at the time
13. Subcontractor 1.
-
13.1 Verify the contractor has been inducted to site, their construction induction card number is recorded and any relevant high risk licence/ticket type and number is recorded (including expiry date where relevant)
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
13.2 Verify the contractor has been inducted into a SWMS for the particular task being undertaken at the time
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
13.3 Verify that any mobile plant being used by the contractor has been inducted to site, is recorded on the plant register, the contractor has been inducted into the SWMS relevant to the plant and maintenance records are up to date, including daily pre-start inspection.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
13.4 Verify that any relevant permits have been signed into by the contractor
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
13.5 Verify that PPE is being worn as per site rules and as required by the SWMS
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
13.6 The chemical in use is included in the MSDS register and a current MSDS is available. If it is a hazardous substance, are the controls mentioned in a SWMS or risk assessment?
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
14. Subcontractor 2.
-
14.1 Verify the contractor has been inducted to site, their construction induction card number is recorded and any relevant high risk licence/ticket type and number is recorded (including expiry date where relevant)
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
14.2 Verify the contractor has been inducted into a SWMS for the particular task being undertaken at the time
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
14.3 Verify that any mobile plant being used by the contractor has been inducted to site, is recorded on the plant register, the contractor has been inducted into the SWMS relevant to the plant and maintenance records are up to date, including daily pre-start inspection.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
14.4 Verify that any relevant permits have been signed into by the contractor
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
14.5 Verify that PPE is being worn as per site rules and as required by the SWMS
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
-
14.6 The chemical in use is included in the MSDS register and a current MSDS is available. If it is a hazardous substance, are the controls mentioned in a SWMS or risk assessment?
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
-
Add media
15. IMS Evaluation
-
15.1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the Project IMS Plan, taking into consideration project scope, size, duration, incidents, corrective actions, previous audit results (if any), relevance to scope of works, personnel changes etc. A response of "Accepted" or below should result in a compete review of the IMS Plan and an update of the relevant sections competed and documented.
- poor
- fair
- accepted
- good
- excellent
- not applicable
Sign Off
-
Site Representative
-
Auditor