Title Page

  • Audit ID/Reference/Number

  • Audit Area / Focus

  • Site/Department/Area

  • Conducted on

  • Auditor name(s)

  • Location - address
  • Personnel involved/audited

Inputs

  • The inputs for the process have been defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record the inputs that have been identified and their classification (e.g. data, materials, communications)

  • The inputs to the process are formally documented.

  • The inputs to the process have been communicated to the personnel receiving and processing the inputs.

  • The quality requirements for inputs have been defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record the quality requirements that have been identified and their accept/reject criteria

  • The quality requirements for the inputs have been formally documented.

  • The input quality requirements to the process have been communicated to the personnel providing the inputs.

  • Additional notes

  • Attach any media - photo/video/sound recording

Process control

  • The required activities/steps/phases of the process have been defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record the activities/steps/phases that have been identified and their relative criticality

  • The activities/steps/phases of the process are formally documented.

  • The activities/steps/phases of the process have been communicated/trained to the personnel performing the process (and evidence is available)

  • The performance quality requirements for process have been defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record the quality requirements that have been identified and their accept/reject criteria

  • The quality requirements to the process are formally documented.

  • The process performance quality requirements have been communicated to the personnel providing the inputs.

  • There is a process/protocol in place to monitor performance of the process.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Describe the monitoring protocol/process

  • The monitoring protocol/process is formally documented.

  • The required responses to monitoring are clearly and unambiguously defined.

  • There is evidence of the implementation of the monitoring protocol/process and appropriate responses.

  • Additional notes

  • Attach any media - photo/video/sound recording

Outputs

  • The outputs for the process have been defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record the outputs that have been identified and their classification (e.g. data, materials, communications)

  • The outputs to the process are formally documented.

  • The outputs to the process have been communicated to the personnel monitoring, measuring and managing outputs.

  • The quality requirements for outputs have been defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record the quality requirements that have been identified and their accept/reject criteria

  • The quality requirements to the outputs are formally documented.

  • The output quality requirements to the process have been communicated to the personnel monitoring and releasing the outputs.

  • There is a protocol/process in place to identify non-conforming outputs.

  • There is evidence that the protocol/process is being implemented consistently.

  • The protocol/process is aligned with the identified quality criteria.

  • The protocol/process identifies method for determining conformance with quality criteria.

  • The protocol/process identifies the required actions for handling non-conforming outputs.

  • Additional notes

  • Attach any media - photo/video/sound recording

User feedback

  • The requirements for customer feedback/acceptance are clearly and unambiguously defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record how the customer feedback/acceptance requirements are documented.

  • The customer feedback/acceptance requirements have been clearly communicated to the relevant personnel.

  • The process/protocol for capturing/identifying/classifying user feedback/acceptance have been defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record the overall protocol/process components.

  • The process/protocol has been formally documented.

  • The process/protocol has been clearly communicated to the personnel involved.

  • There is evidence of the implementation of the process/protocol.

  • Additional notes

  • Attach any media - photo/video/sound recording

Operating context

  • Operating Context defines the external or internal environment. Common ways of defining operating context are the use of PESTLE analysis (Political; Economic; Social; Technological; Environmental; Legal); Stakeholder Analysis; SWOT Analysis (Strengths; Weaknesses; Opportunities; Threats); or some combination of them.

  • The operating context for the process/activity/function has been identified and defined.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record how the operating context is defined (i.e recorded or documented)

  • The inputs to the process of operating context definition are clearly defined.

  • The process for classifying, analysing and prioritising operating context components.

  • There is a process to regularly review and update understanding of the operating context.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record the process for review and update.

  • The review process is appropriately documented.

  • There is evidence of regular review of operating context.

  • Additional notes

  • Attach any media - photo/video/sound recording

Risk management

  • Risk management is an important part of managing a function or process. In some situations, a defined formal risk management strategy is appropriate, however an less formal approach may also be appropriate, depending on the particular circumstances.
    Note well: risk management and threat management are different activities and should not be confused.

  • Risks to the function/process/activity have been identified

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record how the risks are documented and recorded.

  • The risks to the process have been communicated to the personnel.

  • Risks to the function/process/activity have analysed and prioritised.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • Record how the risk priorities are documented and recorded.

  • There is a standard process for analysing and prioritising risks. (This may not be a formal process, depending on circumstances, but it must be standardised and repeatable)

  • There are plans/processes/strategies in place to mitigate the identified risks.

  • Estimate the degree of conformance found as a percentage

  • The mitigation strategies have been clearly communicated to staff.

  • There is evidence of implementation of mitigation strategies.

  • The mitigation strategy includes response requirements if risk become actual events.

  • There is evidence of a process for review risk on a regular basis, and for identifying new or developing risks.

  • Additional notes

  • Attach any media - photo/video/sound recording

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.