Information

  • Document No.

  • Audit Title

  • Client / Site

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Location
  • Number of shop employees associated with steel fabrication

  • Personnel

  • Other company information

5 Management Responsibility

  • Handwritten notes

  • 5.1 (a) Has executive management established and documented a Quality policy?

  • 5.1 (b) Have measurable Quality goals been established and measured to a baseline?

  • 5.2 Have Management reviews taken place and include all required bullet points?

  • 5.3 Has a Management Representative been appointed and does their duties include all of the bullet points?

  • SPE 5.3.3 Is there adequate process equipment?

  • 5.4 Have adequate resources been provided which include personnel, buildings, workspace, equipment and utilities?

  • 5.4.1 Is there evidence that QA, MR and Production management have 5 years experience in steel fabrication?

  • 5.4.1 Is there evidence that QC, purchasing management and detailing checkers have 3 yrs experience in steel fabrication?

  • SPE 5.3.1 does top individual for coating have 1 year experience and is the objective evidence?

  • 5.4.1 Sufficient welding inspectors on staff? AWS CWI?

  • 5.4.1 Sufficient ASNT qualified personnel on staff or under contract? Administrator and technician?

  • 5.4.1 Is there a competent welding technician on staff?

  • 5.4.1 QA QC MR may not report to production, is there an org chart to show this separation?

  • 5.4.1 Is there evidence that the management functions have qualifications (bullets)<br>

  • 5.4.2 Bldgs, workspace, Utilities. SPE 5.3.2 Can the firm demonstrate methods to control ambient conditions to prevent surface contamination? (P1,2,3)

  • 5.4.3 Process equipment and software SPE 5.3.3 (bullets)

  • 5.4.4 Is there adequate inspection equipment?<br>SPE 5.3.4

  • 5.5 Have appropriate lines of communication regarding the effectiveness of the QMS been established?

  • 5.6 Have the documentation requirements for an effective QMS been established, maintained and approved?

  • 5.6 Other Documentation requirements - Org chart, Facility plan, Equipment list, Process interactions ...SPE 5.4

  • F 5.6.2.1 Fracture Control Plan - detailing, Procurement, Welding, Fabrication, Inspection, Repairs....

6. Contract and Project Specification Review and Communication.

  • Handwritten notes

  • 6. Is there an approved documented procedure for contract and spec review?

  • 6. Does review provide for the identification planning and recording of project Requirments?

  • 6. Are there records for audit samples of these reviews?

  • 6. Is there an effective communication process? Changes, RFI process, Distribution....

  • A6 Is there an effective and controlled communication and recording process for decisions and approvals for Advanced bridge requirements?

  • These include special fabrication-related requirements for advanced bridges such as: Shop assemblies, dimensional control and verification, welding, NDT, high performance materials, erection considerations...

7. Detailing

  • Handwritten notes

  • 7.1.1 Is there an approved documented procedure for preparation of shop & erection dwgs?

  • 7.1.1 Is there a effective RFI process in place?

  • 7.1.2 Are detailing standards which include all bullet points of the standard being effectively utilized?

  • I 7.1.2 Are the methods for presenting Assembly drawings included in the detailing standard?

  • F 7.1.2 Are the methods for Identifying Fracture Critical Welds on Erection Framing Drawings included in the detailing standard?

  • 7.1.3.1 Is there an approved documented procedure for Checking of shop & erection dwgs?

  • 7.1.3 Is there a provision describing the method used to release drawings for fabrication?

  • 7.1.3.1 Does it call for the identification of the individual checker?

  • 7.1.3.1 Does it identification of method to verify output of computer generated dwgs and or models?

  • 7.1.3.1 Does it include (if applicable) extent of review of sub-contracted detailed dwgs?

  • 7.1.3.1 Does the procedure for checking include all of the bulleted items per the standard?

  • 7.1.3.2 Is the Customer approval process documented?

  • 7.1.3.3 Is the Control of external supplied dwgs process documented?

  • 7.2.1 Are required references (per contract) maintained? Element 3

  • 7.2.1 Has the responsibilities for detailing management been assigned to a qualified representative within the organization?

  • 7.2.1 Are Detailing management responsibilities defined per the standard (bullets)?

  • 7.2.2 Are experience qualifications of personnel utilized for Detailing and Checking verifiable? 5.4.1

  • I 7.2.2 Is there evidence that detailing personnel have understanding of bridge geometry such as vertical and horizontal alignment, cross slope and roadway transitions?

  • 7.2.3 Subcontract detailers..Has the qualification and selection process been defined as per 10.2?

8. Document and Data Control (Review, Approval, Revision, Access, Obsolescence and Transmittal0

  • Hand written notes

  • 8. Is there an approved documented procedure for document and data control?

  • 8.1 Are QMS documents reviewed for adequacy and approved by the appropriate level of authority?

  • 8.1 Has the frequency of this review been established? SPE

  • 8.2 Are customer requirement revisions controled and distributed to necessary departments?

  • 8.2 Has a method of recording the receipt, change, issue and distribution been established and in use?

  • 8.3 Is there a revision control process for QMS documents?

  • 8.4 Do personnel have access to relevant and current procedures and policies?

  • 8.5 Is there an effective method established to prevent inadvertent use of obsolescent controlled documents? SPE 8.4

  • 8.5 Is there a transmittal system established for controlled documents?

9. Control of Quality Records - (Identification, Collection, Storage, Retrieval, Maintenance, Retention, Disposition)

  • Hand written notes

  • 9. Is there an approved documented procedure for the control of Quality records?

  • Procedure to include: Identification, Collection, Storage, Maintenance, Retrieval, Retention, (backup of electronic data) Disposition and loss prevention.

  • 9.1 Are retention times recorded and maintained? SPE 9.2

  • 9.2 Are Quality records made available for evaluation and review to the owner and fabricator for required time period?

  • SPE 9.3 Minimum required records:<br>

  • Contract review RFI Training COC Qualification and evaluation of sub contractors and suppliers Deviations Surface prep and coating application NC & CA Final inspection Management review

10. Purchasing

  • Hand written notes

  • 10. Is there an approved documented procedure for purchasing? SPE 10.1

  • 10.1 Is purchasing data clearly described on PO documents? SPE 10.2

  • Type of service, material Applicable specifications (witness points) Delivery instructions Required COC, MTR, Other required records ASTM order information SPE - product data sheets and required testing data

  • F AWS D1.5 12.6.7.3 COC for welding gas (4.13) <br>12.6.1 for wire (a501)

  • F 10.1 Is Material used for FC applications identified on purchasing documents? <br>AWS D1.5 12.4 base metal ...fine grain practice, CVN testing req, prohibit mill repairs ...toughness on mill order I.e. 709 req 25@40 for FC <br>AWS D1.5 12.6 consumables ...certified test results..heat and lot as defined in AWS 5.01....exempt ASME, ABS or loyds...12.6.2.1 diffusible hydrogen determined by AWS A4.3...12.6.2.2 H designator...

  • 10.2 is there an selection and evaluation process for suppliers and sub-contractors and is there a procedure and records maintained? SPE 10.3 suppliers 10.4 Sub-contractors

  • 10.3 Do fabrication subcontractors have the required AISC certification?

  • 10.4 Are detailing subcontractors evaluated and is this process defined and records maintained?

  • 10.5 Is verification of purchased items under control and are records maintained as required by procedure?

11. Material Identification

  • Hand written notes

  • 11.1 Is there an approved documented procedure for material identification from the point of receipt to the 1st fabrication process and is it being followed?

  • Identification of SS material - MTR Coating materials - SPE container - color, number ID, lot/batch, quantity, date of manufacture, manufacture ID Metallic coating - composition and ASTM Fasteners - type, grade, size, lot, MTR

  • 11.1 Are records maintained...COC, MTR etc?

  • F 11.2 does procedure and practice provide for heat traceability and MTR ID for FC material throughout fabrication process?

  • 11.2 Is material traceable to corresponding heat # if req by contract?

  • SPE 11.2 Are coating materials stored properly? Expired material marked?

  • SPE 11.3 COC for Coating materials - product name, manufacture name, batch number, date of manufacture, product data sheet, statement that product complies to spec, <br>

12. Fabrication process control

  • Hand written notes

  • 12. Are there approved procedures in place for fabrication processes including "special processes" done at the facility?

  • Processes include: thermal and mechanical cutting, fitting and assembly, welding, drilling, punching, bolting, shearing, milling, sweep, camber, bending, straightening, heating and coating

Welding

  • 12.1 is there an approved and Effective welding procedure in place that includes records of:<br>WPS <br>Preheat<br>PQR <br>WQTR<br>Welder POE

  • I 5.4.3 Are Welding processes and equipment automatic, mechanized or semi-automatic? (No SMAW exclusive for intermediate)

  • 12.1 WPS - Welding procedure specification per applicable code(s)

  • F 12.1 WPS FC

  • 12.1 Pre-heat / post heat requirements

  • F 12.1 Pre heat / post heat for FC (AWS D1.5

  • F 12.1 FC consumable storage (AWS D1.5 12.6)

  • 12.1 PQR-where required

  • F 12.1 FC PQR for code approved processes (ESW EGW and GMAW prohibited AWS 12.5.1) GMAW metal cored see 12.5.1 (AWS D 1.5 12.7.4 POE of PQR) fillet weld soundness test (AWS D1.5 12.7.3)<br>

  • F12.1 PQR POE (AWS D 1.5 12.7.4)

  • 12.1 WQTR-welder qualification test records (AWS D1.5) and POE

  • F12.1 WPQR POE welder performance qualification records, evidence that POE has not expired (AWS D 1.5 12.8.2)

  • 12.1 Traceability of welds to the welders who produce them.

  • 12.1 WPS close proximity and used by the welders.

  • A 12.1 Is there an effective Distortion control program?

  • 12.1 Is there a flux recovery and drying procedure? AWS D1.5 12.6.6 SAW

Bolting

  • 12.2 Bolt installation

  • 12.2 Is there an approved/demonstrable procedure and practice for bolt installation which includes the fabricators Pre installation verification testing preferred method for pretensioned and slip critical joints?

  • 12.2 Is there an approved/demonstrable procedure and process for RCT per AASHTO?

Coating

  • 12.3 Is there an approved procedure and process in place and being followed for material preparations or to application of coatings?

  • SPE 12.1 Is there a controlled process for surface preparation?

  • 12.4 Is there an approved procedure and process in place and being followed for coating application?

  • SPE 12.2.1 Application records (see bullets)

  • SPE 12.2 Is there an effective/demonstrable process for mixing and coating application? Including controlling conditions, debris, masking?

Equipment Maintenance

  • 12.5 Is there an approved procedure and process in place and being followed for equipment maintenance, including preventive maintenance?

  • SPE 12.2.2 Is there an approved procedure for PM and prep and coating equipment?

13. Inspection and testing

  • Hand written notes

  • <br>13. Are there approved procedures and processes in place and being followed, including sampling plans, for inspection?

  • 13 Are levels and frequency adjusted accordingly of effectiveness? (Sampling plan cannot be 0)

  • SPE 13 Is DFT inspection in accordance with SSPC-PA 2?

  • 13.1 Have qualified personnel been assigned inspection duties? ( Do not inspect their own work ) experience 1 year required 13.2.3 is their competency verifiable?<br>SPE 13.1

  • 13.2.1 Is receiving inspection carried out? are there indications of this process? MTR /COC verification of material received.

  • 13.2.2 Are there appropriate in-process inspections carried out? are there indications of this process?

  • 13.2.3 Is appropriate final inspections carried out? are they documented? competency of inspectors verifiable?

  • 13.2.4 Are there records and marks to document inspections? Are they verifiable until final inspection? Are records produced maintained per element 9?

  • SPE 13.2 are final inspections recorded which include, surface prep, DFT, Visual, DFT accuracy per SSPC-PA 2

14 Calibration of inspection and test equipment

  • Hand written notes

  • 14. Are there approved procedures in place for calibration of (MI&T) inspection and test equipment?

  • 14. Does the process and records indicate all of the bullet points required by the standard for each of the pieces of equipment?

  • Service use Handling and storage Frequency ID of relationship to NIST Calibration procedure for each piece of M&TE Acceptance criteria Action taken when out of calibration Calibration record maintenance Protection fro inadvertent use of uncalibrated equipment

  • 14. Are there records of master gages where indicated traceable to NIST?

  • SPE 14. Is there evidence of the Verification of accuracy of the DFT gage per SSPC PA 2 using shims/blocks traceable to NIST? Wet film gage as req by contract..

15. Control of Non-Conformances

  • Hand written notes

  • 15. Is there an approved procedure in place for the control of non-conformances?

  • 15 Does it include inspectors authority to stop work and responsibility to inform production supervision?

  • 15. Are non-conformances being recorded? Do they include: what was inspected, who performed, date of inspection and inspection results?

  • 15.1 Do the procedures contain a provision for non-conforming processes?

  • 15.2 Are there methods to record non-conforming product and keep them from reaching the customer? Are they identified, evaluated, segregated and if repair Reinspected and recorded?

  • 15.2 Is there a material dispositioning process including engineering approval where required?

  • SPE 15 Is there a provision for owners approval for use of where required? Expired materials are non-conforming. May be "used as is" or as "owner approved" ref SSPC PA 1.

  • F 15.2 Is there a FC repair provision in the procedures? Critical and non-critical. If owner approval is required is a record kept?

16. Corrective Action

  • Hand written notes

  • 16. Is there an approved procedure in place for Corrective Action?

  • 16. Is the CA process applied at the times indicated by the bullet points of the standard?<br>Customer complaint<br>Repetitive NC<br>In or Ex audit<br>QMS NC<br>Sever or costly NC

  • 16 Does the CA procedure include all of the bullet points of the standard?<br>Record <br>Assign responsibility<br>Remedial action<br>Investigate root cause<br>Actions to be taken to prevent reoccurrence<br>Communicate<br>Verify and monitor for effectiveness

  • 16. Are records of CA maintained at least until an annual MR takes place?

17. Handling, Storage, and Delivery of Product and Materials

  • Hand written notes

  • 17. Are materials and product stored and shipped with care required by contract? SPE

  • 17 Is "material on hand" or owner supplied material protected?

  • F Are consumables stored properly?

  • F is material handled so as not to damage and cause unneeded base metal repair?

18. Training

  • Hand written notes

  • 18. Do the records indicate the subject matter topics, course outline, qualified person providing the training, who attended and date of training? SPE

  • 18. Is there a record of comprehension of subject matter (desirable)?

  • SPE 18.2 Does training include items listed in ASTM D 3276?

  • Intermediate Bridge: Has fabricator established a training program for intermediate bridges for the workforce?

  • Advanced Bridge: Has fabricator established a training program for advanced bridges for the workforce?

  • Fracture Critical Bridge Members: Has fabricator established a training program for advanced bridges for the workforce?

19. Internal Audit

  • Hand written notes

  • 19. Has an internal audit been conducted by a qualified individual? SPE

  • 19. Does the record indicate findings and are these incorporated into the CA process?

  • 19. Is the record of the IA maintained at least until the annual MR?

Qualifications for Supplements

  • Intermediate bridge:<br>Has fabricator supplied plate girder spans with field splices for highway or railroad bridges within the last 5 yrs? See also training

  • Advanced Bridge: <br>Has fabricator supplied advanced bridges or intermediate bridges within the last 5 years? See also training

  • Fracture Critical:<br>Has the fabricator supplied FC members in accordance with AWS D 1.5 within the last 5 yrs? See also training.

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.