Contracted Line Maintenace Station Inspection Report (CAMO-X006A issue 05 11-Feb-21)

• Date of station inspection:

  Date

• LM Manager name:

• LM Manager job title:

• Do you hold LM-ASA approval on PA20?

  Yes

  No

• You may not conduct this station inspection as you do not hold the approval as required by procedure CAMO-AUDIT

• Station:

• Station type:

  Agency

  Hybrid

  OCTEC

  Maintrol

  Sub-contracted under BA 145

• Contracted supplier name:

INSTRUCTIONS

• This form is to be used for conducting contracted line maintenance station inspections in accordance with procedure CAMO-AUDIT and by line maintenance managers holding LM-ASA approval as required by Engineering procedure MA-LM-0-1-WI.15.
  Copies of the following information are required in support of this inspection;-
  
  1. Contracted supplier 145 certificate (Form 3 approval - as used for certification of BA aircraft e.g. EASA/CAA or per bi-lateral)
  2. Contracted supplier approved MOE or equivalent including any supplement as required in support of the approval e.g. CAA/bi-lateral)
  3. Current signed contract and any supporting side letters.
  4. Contracted supplier last NAA station audit report (supplier may decline to show this or allow copies to be taken)
  5. Contracted supplier last Quality station audit report (supplier may decline to show this or allow copies to be taken)
  6. A certifying engineer who have certified in BA technical log - NAA Licence, Company aircraft approval record & Training record

• Review the last Station inspection (CAMO-X006A) and CAMO desktop audit (CAMO-X006B) report observations and findings to determine any repeats whilst conduction this station inspection.

1 SUPPLIER INFORMATION

• This section is to record contact information of those responsible for 145 compliance in support of the approval. It also includes an assessment of the workscope and competence of the organisation to support it.

• 1.1 145 approval number :

• 1.2 Name and e-mail of Quality Manager:

• 1.3 Name and e-mail of Station Manager:

• 1.4 BA Aircraft types and workscope:

  Select A318 A319/320/321 A350 A380 B777 B787 OCTEC Transit Daily Weekly Parking C&M Other

  • A318
  • A319/320/321
  • A350
  • A380
  • B777
  • B787
  • OCTEC
  • Transit
  • Daily
  • Weekly
  • Parking C&M
  • Other

• 1.5 Supplier capability for the scope of work? (Established = type approval held >12 mths. Developing if < 12 mths)?

  Select Established (>12 mths with type approval) Developing (< 12 mths with type approval)

  • Established (>12 mths with type approval)
  • Developing (< 12 mths with type approval)

• 1.6 BA Supplier - (New (<12 mths) or established (>12 mths))?

  New (<12 mths)

  Established (>12 mths)

• 1.7 Number of certifying staff supporting BA:

• 1.8 Number of BA departures per week:

• 1.9 Does BA's MOE, Section 5.3 (DIR 10201350) WWLM approved contractor station listing show the correct aircraft type, scope of work and contracted supplier?

  Yes

  No

• 1.10 What approval is the supplier using to certify BA aircraft?

  Select CAA 145 EASA 145 (using Special CRS-Practice 3) EASA 145 (UK/US bi-lateral) Foreign 145 (UK/NAA bi-lateral)

  • CAA 145
  • EASA 145 (using Special CRS-Practice 3)
  • EASA 145 (UK/US bi-lateral)
  • Foreign 145 (UK/NAA bi-lateral)

2 SUPPLIER QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW (145.A.10, A.20, A.65, MA708(c)/CAMO.A.315(c))

• This section is to check the effectiveness of the supplier's quality system and oversight by the NAA who have issued the 145 approval.
  The supplier may choose not to show or allow copies of audit reports but it is important to establish if audits have been conducted and findings closed with effective action to prevent reoccurrence.
  

• 2.1 Is there proof that the MOE has been approved by the NAA?

  Yes

  No

• 2.2 Does the 145 approval certificate and MOE cover the scope of work required including aircraft and engine types?

  Yes

  No

• 2.3 Has a 145 audit of the supplier been conducted by the NAA (either the station or the 145 approved organisation)?

  Yes

  No

• 2.4 Has a quality audit of the station been conducted by the suppliers quality department in the past 2 years?

  Yes

  No

• 2.5 Have the quality audit findings been closed and implemented in a timely manner to prevent reoccurence (as per supplier procedures)?

  Yes

  No

3 CONTRACT REVIEW (MA 708(c)/CAMO.A.315(c))

• This section is to ensure that a written contract with an approved 145 organisation has been established and both BA and the supplier comply with it's requirements.

• 3.1 Is the contract an IATA Standard Ground Handling Agreement (SGHA)?

  Yes

  No

• 3.2 Does the contract specify the aircraft/engine types and scope of work accomplished at the station?

  Yes

  No

• 3.3 Is the contract signed by both BA and the supplier?

  Yes

  No

• 3.4 Is the supplier compliant with the terms of the contract?

  Yes

  No

• 3.5 Is BA compliant with the terms of the contract?

  Yes

  No

4 PLANNING & SUPPLIER PROCEDURES (145.A.30, A.45 & A.60, MA 708(c)/CAMO.A.315(c))

• This section is to ensure sufficient qualified personnel are planned for the expected workload and that they have sufficient periods of rest to avoid maintenance errors due to fatigue. Implementation of procedures that ensure feedback of occurrences, provision of maintenance data and handovers as key area's of importance are included.

• 4.1 Are there sufficient qualified personnel to support the workload and are they rostered to cover the BA operation?

  Yes

  No

• 4.2 Are procedures implemented to ensure compliance with working time limitations (EU or local legislation as applicable) to reduce risk of maintenance errors due to fatigue?

  Yes

  No

• 4.3 Does the supplier have an occurrence reporting system where incident are reported and investigated to prevent reoccurrence including MOR's applicable to BA aircraft reported to BA as the operator?

  Yes

  No

• 4.4 Are procedures implemented to ensure data protection and disposal of records by shredding as required?

  Yes

  No

• 4.5 Does the supplier have access to current BA maintenance data?

  Yes

  No

• 4.6 Are procedures implemented for airworthiness handovers to minimise the risk of maintenance errors and ensure all required maintenance has been properly carried out?

  Yes

  No

5 SAMPLE ENGINEERS TRAINING & COMPETENCE (145.A.30, A.35, A.45, A.50)

• This section sample an engineer who has certified on BA aircraft is suitably trained, approved and competent todo so.

• Engineer 1 Name:

• Approval number:

• 5.1 Is the approval held current and does it cover the scope of work certified on BA aircraft?

  Yes

  No

• 5.2 Is the NAA licence held current and does it cover the scope required to hold the approval?

  Yes

  No

• 5.3 Are records held showing completion of training in support of the authorisation held including aircraft type, EWIS, FTS, ETOPS as applicable?

  Yes

  No

• 5.4 Are records held showing completion of human factors continuation training as required by supplier procedures?

  Yes

  No

• 5.5 Is there a record showing completion of BA specific training including Docs and procs?

  Yes

  No

• 5.6 Is Engineer aware of the scope and limitations of his/her authorisation?

  Yes

  No

• 5.7 Sample BA Aircraft Log copies and confirm Certification for work carried out is within the scope of the individuals authorisation.

  Yes

  No

• 5.8 Have recency requirements of six months aircraft maintenance in the last two years been met and recorded as per supplier procedures?

  Yes

  No

• 5.9 Is Engineer compliant with BA 'Read and sign' requirements?

  Yes

  No

• 5.10 Can Engineer access and navigate current BA maintenance data (Pinpoint)?

  Yes

  No

• 5.11 Can Engineer access and navigate BA procedures applicable to role?

  Yes

  No

• 5.12 Does Engineer have access and know how to raise an occurrence report in AIR or alternative reporting using X1022 form?

  Yes

  No

• 5.13 For SAP stations, is Engineer aware of the required SAP transactions and able to complete them?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

6 SAMPLE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS (145.A.40, A.42, A.45, A.48, A.50, MA 708(c)/CAMO.A.315(c))

• This section covers observation of certifying Engineer conducting maintenance (preferably on BA aircraft) to ensure that the required maintenance standards are met and that all required maintenance has been properly carried out in accordance with approved data.

• 6.1 Engineer name:

• 6.2 Approval number:

• 6.3 Flight number:

• 6.4 Aircraft type and check:

• 6.5 Was the task accomplished in accordance with applicable, current and approved maintenance data?

  Yes

  No

• 6.6 Was the maintenance standards required met including inspection standard, use of approved tools, equipment, materials and parts?

  Yes

  No

• 6.7 Was the work accomplished correctly recorded and certified?

  Yes

  No

• 6.8 Are BA ramp check sheets instructions followed and certified as applicable?

  Yes

  No

7 STORES (145.A.25, A.40, A.42)

• Review stores facilities and control of BA parts to ensure required standards are met.

• 7.1 Are stores facilities suitable for the protection of parts including security, shelving, segregation, environmental controls, protective packaging and free from contamination?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7.2 Sample parts held against records for station holding on SAP (MB52). Does stock holding accurately reflect the SAP records?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7.3 Ensure effective shelf life control as per supplier procedures. Are controls effective?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7.4 Are release documents (CAA Form 1, EASA Form 1 or equivalent) retained with component and correct?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7.5 Are supplier and BA procedures followed for the control of parts both serviceable (receipt inspection) and unserviceable (despatch)?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7.6 Storage of oils and flammable items are in accordance with supplier procedure?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7.7 If the supplier has sourced materials used on BA aircraft are they from an approved supplier supported by acceptable release documents?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 7.8 Are Dangerous Goods identified and handled in accordance with supplier procedures to ensure compliance?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

8 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT (145.A.40)

• Review tools and equipment used in support of BA operation to ensure required standards are met.

• 8.1 Are personal tool control procedures implemented and effective in ensuring tools are serviceable, the required standard and risk of loss minimised?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• 8.2 Are calibrated tools controlled as per supplier procedures?

  Yes

  No

• 8.3 Is ground equipment used to accomplish the aircraft maintenance serviceable and maintained?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

9. FACILITIES (145.A.25)

• Conduct a walk round inspection of all facilities that are utilised in support of BA contract to ensure they are appropriate for the work undertaken and risk of distraction, contamination, FOD, lack of lighting, weather environment and noise is addressed.

• 9.1 Are facilities where the maintenance is conducted including the ramp free from contamination, FOD and risk of aircraft damage?

  Yes

  No

• 9.2 Is sufficient lighting available to conduct inspections?

  Yes

  No

• 9.3 Are office facilities suitable to allow the work to be planned, navigation and printing of maintenance data and completion of maintenance records in a manner that contributes to good maintenance standards?

  Yes

  No

• 9.4 All facilities including stores are secure and access restricted to authorised personnel only?

  Yes

  No

10 FINAL ITEMS

• 10.1 Is a list of all supplier Engineers authorised to work BA aircraft, including non certifying, available and upto date?

  Yes

  No

• Click to add ADHOC questions

Question

• Is this compliant?

  Yes

  No

• On completion of the station inspection signoff below as complete and upload a pdf copy to the line maintenance sharepoint site.
  The CAMO will review the report and raise any non-conformances in AIR and forward these to the contracted organisations Quality Manager for appropriate action. Items that have not met the threshold for findings are considered as observations to be followed up locally by the AMM.
  
  

• Sign the station inspection as complete

  Sign