Title Page

  • Site conducted

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Location
  • When completing an audit, the auditor shall ensure that all works are carried out by competent staff and they will be looking for conformity with the audit criteria.

  • During the audit the auditor will make a note of any non conformance & send an action with priority to the relevant project/site manager.

  • Priority: High (Major Deficiency) Medium (Minor Deficiency) Low (Observations)

SA-10 Site Safety Audit

    Site Safety Audit

Access on site

  • Can everyone get to their place of work safely - and work there safely?

  • Is the site tidy, and are materials stored safely?

  • Is lighting adequate, especially when work is being carried on after dark outside or inside buildings?

Documentation

  • Are RAMS on site? have these been signed onto by the working party, and is work being undertaken in accordance with instruction?

  • Have Daily/Situation Specific RA’s been completed?

  • Are underground service drawing records on site? have those services identified been marked out on the carriageway/footway?

  • Are necessary permits completed and is all necessary documentation on site, including: Safety from the System permits, Permits to Load, Excavation Permits, Hot works permits etc:

  • Are EDSP ‘Temporary Works Details’ Tags displayed where required, or is third party documentation available to qualify load bearing capacity of temporary work?

  • Accident book on site?

  • DSR's & OPM's on site?

  • Copies of Authorisations/NER's Passports on site?

  • Scaffolding
  • Are scaffolds erected, altered and dismantled by competent people and are scaff tags in place?

  • Are there double guard rails and toe boards, or other suitable protection, at every edge, to prevent falling and are lifts/platforms fully boarded and secure to prevent falls?

  • Is there evidence to substantiate scaffold inspections are undertaken weekly, following alteration or periods of inclement weather?

  • Have proprietary tower scaffolds been erected and are they being used in accordance with suppliers' instructions?

  • Jointing
  • Are access and egress arrangements, including those employed in an emergency, suitable and uninhibited?

  • Are LPG/Oxy-Acetylene/Argon canisters positioned stored far enough from J/B such that any leakage will be dispersed in air and not accumulate within the J/B

  • Are suitable type and number of extinguishers available within the J/B whilst hot works are being undertaken? Have these been inspected, are inspection tags evident

  • Is natural ventilation suitable to disperse vapours and solvents generated by process or does consideration need to be given to forced extraction/ventilation?

  • Are BOC CP7/GN7 inspection tags attached to gas equipment validating suitability for use?

  • Are shoring arrangements suitable?

  • Excavations
  • Is there adequate support for the excavation, or has it been sloped or battered back to a safe angle?

  • Is there a safe method used for putting in the support, without people working in an unsupported trench?

  • Is there safe access into the excavation, e.g. a sufficiently long, secured ladder/Steps leading into same?

  • Are there barriers or other protection to stop people and vehicles falling in?

  • Could the excavation affect the stability of neighboring structures or services, and are excavated materials stored away from edges of excavation to prevent surcharging?

  • Is the excavation regularly inspected by a competent person?

  • Traffic vehicles and Plant
  • Are signing and guarding arrangements around work areas adequate to prevent/minimize interface with vehicular or pedestrian traffic. (NRSWA Chapter 8 requirements)

  • Is there adequate clearance around slewing vehicles?

  • Have drivers/operators received proper training and are they competent for the vehicles or plant they are operating?

  • Are loads properly- secured?

  • Are vehicles & Plant operating within manufacturer’s specifications, including gradient of slopes being worked on?

  • Is the haul road in good repair, clean and free from Hazards?

  • Are all dangerous parts guarded, e.g. gears, chains drives, projecting engine shafts?

  • Are tools and machinery maintained in good repair and are all safety devices, including guards/RCD’s etc. operating correctly?

  • Are the operators trained and competent?

  • Is the equipment inspected by a competent person?

  • Lifting
  • Are the operators trained and competent?

  • Does equipment used for lifting have a current report of thorough examination and a record of inspection? Are CE certificates available for all newly purchased equipment?

  • Is the rated capacity clearly marked?

  • Is a lift plan in place?

  • Are lifting RAMs in place?

  • Confined Spaces and COSHH
  • Are there adequate escape routes and are these kept clear?

  • Is there adequate first-aid provision, and suitable numbers of First Aid trained personnel?

  • Are smoking and other ignition sources banned in areas where gases or flammable liquids are stored or used?

  • Is flammable and combustible waste removed regularly and stored in suitable bins or skips?

  • Are suitable fire extinguishers provided?

  • Have workers had information and training so they know what the risks are from the hazardous substances used and produced on site, and what they need to do to avoid the risks?

  • Tools and Equipment
  • Is the supply voltage for tools and equipment the lowest necessary for doing the job?

  • Are trip devices (RCD’s) used on items operating at higher voltage?

  • Is equipment checked by users, visually examined on site and regularly inspected and tested by a competent person?

  • Is a register available identifying when tools & equipment have been electrically tested?

SA-11 Environmental Audit

    Waste Storage & Transport
  • Is waste stored on site for long periods, or is waste produced by others being stored? If so, is the required environmental permit (England & Wales) or Waste Management license (Scotland & Northern Ireland) in place?

  • Is a waste storage exemption required rather than a full environmental permit/ waste management license, or is the operation covered by the Non-Waste Framework Directive, not requiring registration for an exemption (ie. Storing waste temporarily for collection on the site it was produced for 12 months or less)

  • Is waste securely housed so that it can’t be blown away or escape (protect from the elements)?

  • Are measures in place to prevent run-off from the waste storage area entering surface water drains (stored on an impermeable surface with a bund)

  • Is the site secure so as to prevent pollution caused by vandals?

  • Are hazardous/special wastes stored separately from other waste materials in containers which are: sealed, clearly labelled, covered and waterproof, and is the storage area/container bunded or held in a drip tray or interceptor of suitable capacity?

  • Are Waste Transfer notes completed and available ( kept for 2 years) for all loads of waste passed on? (A season ticket can be utilised if you have regular collections of the same type of waste from the same carrier?)

  • Are consignment notes completed for the carriage of hazardous/special wastes? (keep for a minimum of 3 years)

  • Are Carrier License certificates and Waste Management License certificates available for those transporting waste away from site and for final destinations of the waste?

  • Are containment areas, particularly those housing oils (including fuels, silicon, DBB etc) suitably bunded. (Pollution Prevention Guidelines (PPG) 2 – Above ground Oil Storage Tanks).

  • Are Spill kits and spill response procedures in place?

  • Has a Site Waste Management Plan been produced?

  • Fuelling and Fuel Storage
  • Have plant storage and refuelling areas been established?

  • Are quantities of fuels on site kept to a minimum?

  • Are fuel, oil and chemical storage facilities located on an impermeable surface away from water sewers, drainage, grids and channel and water courses?

  • If containers, oil drums/fuel bowsers etc, have a capacity > 200 Ltrs, is there secondary containment to ensure leaks can’t enter watercourses (i.e. double skinned)

  • Is secondary containment of sufficient volume to contain 110% of the capacity of the largest container or 25% of total storage capacity?

  • If the storage area is located where there is a risk of vehicle collision, have heavy duty barriers or other means been utilised to prevent collision?

  • Are hoses and connection being checked for leaks or faults?

  • Loose Aggregates, Spoil and CBS
  • Are materials stored suitably so as to prevent entry to watercourses or surface water drains, and are any storage silos/containers properly bunded?

  • If mixing is taking place on site, has a barrier been constructed around the mixing area and supply lines to prevent its escape?

  • If trucks, hoppers, mixers and concrete pumps need to be washed out, is this being done in a contained area away from watercourses and drains?

  • Are materials stored such so as to prevent root damage to adjacent vegetation?

  • Noise and Dust
  • Has an application been made, or is one required, to the local council Control prior to works commencing, under Section 61 of the Control of Pollution Act, allowing for the noise made by construction activities?

  • Are vehicles/plant subject to a regime of planned preventative maintenance reducing noise levels and vibration from any defects arising?

  • Is power provided from a fixed supply rather than utilising generators?

  • Is a high level of housekeeping employed on site?

  • Are skips and wagons, where reasonable and practicable, covered?

  • Are road sweepers or wheel wash stations used at exits onto public roads?

  • Where there is a problem created by dust, are stockpiles/ unmade haul roads being damped down?

  • Plant & Equipment
  • Are all items of plant subject to daily plant operatives checks and subject to planned preventative maintenance?

  • Are excessive volumes/plumes of dark smoke being omitted from plant & equipment highlighting the need for maintenance?

  • Are static items of plant/equipment located on plant nappies/drip or interceptor trays (where containing oil/diesel/anti-freeze/hydraulic fluids)

  • Are oil absorbent pads, suitable for use with water, being used to remove oil from interceptor/drip trays, and are these in addition to contaminated contents being treated as special/hazardous waste and being disposed of appropriately?

  • Where rainwater from drip trays is being poured onto the ground, are checks being undertaken to ensure there is no oily sheen. If there is any doubt as to whether rain water contained within drip trays storing chemicals is contaminated, are water tests being undertaken prior to deciding whether to remove as special/hazardous waste?

  • Are maintenance schedules/weekly checks being undertaken on tools & equipment by the site/yard foreman, and are there records available within project folders to substantiate same?

  • Is there a dedicated washing facility within the site compound for washing down vehicles and preventing contaminants being washed into watercourses or drains?

  • Spillages and Spill Response
  • Has an emergency spill response procedure been prepared? has this been briefed to operatives and do supervisors have a hard copy on site in the event of a spillage

  • Has a bio-remediation company been identified to deal with any major spillages? Are contact details readily available?

  • Are spill kits available, including within all items of plant, and are they of sufficient capacity to deal with potential spillages?

  • Are contaminated spoils/absorbent materials used to contain/clean up after a spillage, disposed of appropriately.

  • Water Environment
  • Has an application been made to the local water company or authority for discharging effluent onto the public foul sewer or private sewer that connects to the public sewer?

  • If effluent can’t be discharged to the foul sewer, are’ waste duty of care responsibilities’ being adhered to (handling, recovery and disposal?)

  • Before discharging anything other than clean uncontaminated water to surface water or ground water, have checks been made with the Environment agency to determine the need for an environmental permit, or need to register an exemption from an environmental permit (England & Wales only)

  • Has an authorisation from Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) been sought for any activity likely to cause pollution? If there is a risk of run off being contaminated do you have an authorisation under the Controlled Activities Regulations? (Scotland Only)?

  • If water is being pumped from trenches/excavations, where checks have all ready been made with the consenting authority to determine whether this is acceptable, are silt removal measures being employed or are waters being pumped onto grassy lands to filter any residual silt?

  • Ecological Concerns & Impacts
  • Is there a likelihood of any activities affecting a protected species (thereby potentially committing an offence) and have requisite consent, license or permit applications been made prior to carrying on with our activities?. (Natural England, Northern Ireland Environmental Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage, Countryside Council for Wales)

  • If we are aware the area supports a protected species, has an ecological survey been undertaken over the area identifying ways to mitigate unavoidable damage or disturbance, and have licensing requirements been established enabling works to proceed in spite of the presence of protected species?.

  • Are excavations being undertaken in proximity to trees? If so, is guidance contained within NJUG Volume 4 being adhered to (i.e. Hand digging or trenchless installation within precaution zone/ not severing roots of diameter in excess of 25mm/avoiding compaction of soils around routes by incorrect storing of spoils/vehicle and plant movements)

  • Are consents required from consenting authorities, and have permissions been secured for the removal of trees to facility works?

  • Are covers or escape ramps in pace to prevent animals being trapped within excavations?

SA-18 Operational Audit (Competent Persons)

    Audit Overview
  • The principal objective of the audit is to monitor safe systems of work relating to electrical safety. This should include safe access and egress, a safe place of work and a safe working environment. Any hazard associated with the work activity should have sufficient control measures on place to minimise risk to staff, public and infrastructure.

  • Task Activity

  • Circuit ID

  • Details Of Competent Person Being Audited
  • Name

  • Authorisation Codes Held

  • Authorisations on Site

  • DSR and OPM On Site?

  • Codes Appropriate for Work?

  • General Set Up
  • On site risk assessment completed and signed on to by all parties?

  • Is there safe access and egress into working area?

  • Adequate space around point of work?

  • Is there sufficient light and adequate visibility?

  • Suitable body posture?

  • Adequate ventilation?

  • Potential Distractions? (Mobile phone, personal audio, eating and drinking)

  • Clear understanding of Task? including requirements of DSR/OPM

  • Site records/drawings provided and correctly interpreted?

  • Relevant training and competence?

  • Craft Manuals, drawings and specifications on site?

  • Personal Protective Equipment
  • PPE available on site?

  • Correct PPE selected for the task?

  • PPE in a safe and usable condition?

  • PPE stored correctly?

  • Working Practices
  • Lead role appointed?

  • Communication with working group?

  • Communication with third parties?

  • In accordance with specification?

  • Emergency preparedness?

  • Task completion procedures?

  • Understanding of relevant safety documents?

  • Working party correct understanding of safety documents?

  • Delineation?

  • Correct tools/equipment for the job and in good working condition?

  • Correct understanding of working procedures?

  • Summary
  • Is competent person suitable for current level of authorisations?

  • Would you recommend competent person for any further training or authorisation under supervision?

  • Signature

SA-19 Operational Audit AP/SAP

    Audit Overview
  • The principal objective of the audit is to monitor safe systems of work relating to electrical safety. This should include safe access and egress, a safe place of work and a safe working environment. Any hazard associated with the work activity should have sufficient control measures on place to minimise risk to staff, public and infrastructure.

  • Task Activity

  • Circuit ID

  • Details Of Competent Person Being Audited
  • Name

  • Authorisation Codes Held

  • Authorisations on Site

  • DSR and OPM On Site?

  • Codes Appropriate for Work?

  • General Set Up
  • On site risk assessment completed and signed on to by all parties?

  • Is there safe access and egress into working area?

  • Adequate space around point of work?

  • Is there sufficient light and adequate visibility?

  • Suitable body posture?

  • Adequate ventilation?

  • Potential Distractions? (Mobile phone, personal audio, eating and drinking)

  • Clear understanding of Task? including requirements of DSR/OPM

  • Site records/drawings provided and correctly interpreted?

  • Relevant training and competence?

  • Craft Manuals, drawings and specifications on site?

  • Comments

  • Personal Protective Equipment
  • PPE available on site?

  • Correct PPE selected for the task?

  • PPE in a safe and usable condition?

  • PPE stored correctly?

  • Comments

  • Working Practices
  • Permit holder appointed?

  • Communication with working group?

  • Communication with third parties?

  • In accordance with specification?

  • Emergency preparedness?

  • Task completion procedures?

  • Understanding of relevant safety documents?

  • Working party correct understanding of safety documents?

  • Delineation?

  • Comments?

  • Test Equipment
  • Test bushings (Checked and in date)

  • Cable ID equipment

  • HV test set

  • Phasing equipment

  • Overheadline proving equipment

  • Test/Connection leads

  • Comments

  • LV Operations
  • Potential back feeds considered?

  • Screening - Adjacent live apparatus indicated?

  • Overhead - Shorting and earthing device used?

  • Are there any implications of LV operations in relation to HV sources?

  • Comments

  • HV Operations
  • Discussion before exchange of formal messages?

  • Completion of log book/switching schedule?

  • Are entries clear, accurate and unambiguous?

  • Are all entries time and date stamped?

  • Are previous entries completed correctly and to a legible standard?

  • Use of Diagram/SLD?

  • Issue of instructions through appropriate control engineer?

  • Ferro-resonance considered?

  • Potential back feeds considered?

Points of Isolation

  • Caution notices applied

  • Danger notices applied

  • Safety locks applied

Potential Indicators

  • Approved devices?

  • Note condition and inspection date

Screening

  • Adjacent live apparatus indicated?

Circuit Main Earths

  • Positions relative to source of supply

  • Distance from actual points of work

  • Condition and methods of connection

  • Safety Documentation
  • Safety documents

Part 1 - Issue

  • Is the whole of part 1 of the document legible? are there unclear abbreviations?

  • Have all the sections of Part 1 of the document been completed by the SAP?

  • Is the work to be carried out clearly and unambiguosly described on the document?

  • List the supplementary documents attached or associated with the safety document

Part 2 - Receipt

  • Has the Safety Document been signed and completed by the person responsible for carrying out the work

  • Does the person responsible for carrying out the work have a copy of the Safety Document in his possession

  • Does the person responsible for carrying out the work or testing understand:

  • which parts of the system at the work location are DEAD and EARTHED

  • which parts are LIVE

  • the details and limits of work or testing to be carried out

  • Has the person responsible for carrying out the work adequately advised the men under his control as to which parts are safe and which parts are dangerous?

  • Have additional earths been applied to overhead lines to protect against potential backfeeds.

  • Compliance
  • Is the electrical system earthed at the points indicated on the safety document?

  • Have other precautions noted on the permit been put into effect?

  • Are the points of isolation secured?

  • How have the safety precautions been put into effect on the LOA

  • Compliance with DSR/OPM
  • Do the precautions taken comply with rule 4.1.1(a) to (f) of the DSR?

  • Do the precautions taken comply with rule 4.3 of the DSR?

  • Are there any other DSRs specifically applicable to the work specified on the PTW? (make note)

  • Is the application of safety locks, Caution, Danger and Circuit Main Earth Notices in accordance with the DSR and OPM?

  • Open Compound Work
  • Delineation

  • Access gate chosed

  • Yellow cones, black and yellow chain

  • Green mini cones

  • Large notices

  • Live conductors overhead notices

  • Marked up site plan

  • Live compound risk assessment

  • System Alterations
  • Is the apparatus under construction or fully disconnected?

  • Is there a record of the change of state notice?

  • Is the time and date recorded?

  • Has the change of state notice been issued by the SAP?

  • Has the control engineer been informed?

  • Receipt by the contractor/team leader

  • Are there any other precautions of safety measures which the auditor considers necessary? (if yes note in comments)

  • System Control
  • Does the apparatus made safe, the points of isolation, location of circuit main earths, any other safety aspects and the work or testing to be undertaken correspond with the System Control Engineer’s understanding of the required precautions and switching actions. If NO what are the differences?

  • Other Relevant Information
  • If any of the foregoing answers indicate an unsatisfactory situation arrange for copies of the Safety Document(s) and relevant parts of the system diagram together with any other significant documentation to be attached to this report. Please list attachments:

  • Summary
  • Is the authorised person suitable for current level of authorisations?

  • Would you recommend authorised person for any further training or authorisation under supervision?

NERS Audits

    NERS-09 Civils Audit
  • When completing an audit, the auditor shall ensure that all works are carried out by competent staff and they will be looking for conformity with the audit criteria which in all cases shall be compliance with the Lloyds Register NERS Requirements Document, technical specifications, working instructions and any other specified requirements of a customer or contract relevant to the task being undertaken.

  • During the audit the auditor will make a note of any non conformance & send an action with priority to the relevant project/site manager.

  • Priority: High (Major Deficiency) Medium (Minor Deficiency) Low (Observations)

  • Are the depths of cable/s installed to relevant standard/CoP?

  • Has POWRA been carried out (SA-12 POWRA) been completed?

  • Has HSG47 safe digging methods been followed during excavation?

  • Are marker tape/tiles at satisfactory cover and in accordance with specification?

  • Are ducts in accordance with specification?

  • Is adequate clearance provided to other cables and utility plant?

  • Does the cable comply with the relevant specification/manufacture?

  • Are deep excavation adequately shuttered with safe access provided?

  • Are deep excavations routinely inspected and recorded?

  • Are barriers, footpath provision and advance signs in accordance with NRSWA?

  • Are courtesy boards with emergency telephone number clearly displayed?

  • Are barriers checked out of hours in known hazardous/vandal prone situations?

  • Is adequate protection of tree roots taken in accordance with NJUG 10?

  • NERS-10 Cable Excavation and Installation
  • When completing an audit, the auditor shall ensure that all works are carried out by competent staff and they will be looking for conformity with the audit criteria which in all cases shall be compliance with the Lloyds Register NERS Requirements Document, technical specifications, working instructions and any other specified requirements of a customer or contract relevant to the task being undertaken.

  • During the audit the auditor will make a note of any non conformance & send an action with priority to the relevant project/site manager.

  • Priority: High (Major Deficiency) Medium (Minor Deficiency) Low (Observations)

  • Are the depths of cable/s installed to relevant standard/CoP?

  • Is the bedding and blinding in accordance with specification?

  • Are marker tape/tiles at satisfactory cover and in accordance with specification?

  • Are ducts in accordance with specification?

  • Is adequate clearance provided to other cables and utility plant?

  • Is the laid position of cable/s in accordance with NJUG 7?

  • Does the cable comply with the relevant specification/manufacture?

  • Are adequate cable rollers/bends/bell mouths installed for pulling?

  • Is the winch operator trained?

  • Are maximum pulling tensions communicated to the winch man and observed?

  • Is the cable attachment/tension limiting bolts adequate?

  • Is the cable trailer of adequate size and in satisfactory condition?

  • Is the cable drum positioned correctly for the pull?

  • Is the cable pull adequately supervised?

  • Is adequate communication used during pulling operations (2-way radios)?

  • Is the minimum bending radius for cable observed?

  • Are excavator slew zones adequately barriered?

  • Are deep excavation adequately shuttered with safe access provided?

  • Are deep excavations routinely inspected and recorded?

  • Are barriers, footpath provision and advance signs in accordance with NRSWA?

  • Are courtesy boards with emergency telephone number clearly displayed?

  • Are barriers checked out of hours in known hazardous/vandal prone situations?

  • Is adequate protection of tree roots taken in accordance with NJUG 10?

  • Are cable moisture seals/heat shrink caps/earthed adequate and to specification?

  • NERS-11 Cable Jointing
  • When completing an audit, the auditor shall ensure that all works are carried out by competent staff and they will be looking for conformity with the audit criteria which in all cases shall be compliance with the Lloyds Register NERS Requirements Document, technical specifications, working instructions and any other specified requirements of a customer or contract relevant to the task being undertaken.

  • During the audit the auditor will make a note of any non conformance & send an action with priority to the relevant project/site manager.

  • Priority: High (Major Deficiency) Medium (Minor Deficiency) Low (Observations)

  • LV Jointing
  • Is the jointing area clean and dry?

  • Is the joint hole of adequate size for Live jointing?

  • Is suitable weather protection available on site and used when appropriate?

  • Is the Live working PPE worn as appropriate and in good condition?

  • Are the Live working insulating/insulated tools in good condition?

  • Are suitable test procedures used on mains and service cables?

  • Is the sequencing of the neutral and phase connections made correctly?

  • Is a soft flame heat torch used for heat shrink insulation?

  • Is PVC abrasion satisfactory for moisture seals?

  • Is degreasing undertaken in accordance with the jointing instruction?

  • Is the earth rod (where required) adequately installed & connected?

  • Are cut outs satisfactorily made off and sealed on completion?

  • Where appropriate is a loop impedance test undertaken and recorded?

  • Where appropriate is a polarity test undertaken?

  • Where appropriate is a phase rotation check undertaken?

  • Is the joint resin adequately mixed and safely handled?

  • Is appropriate time allowed for resin to set?

  • Is the jointing area kept clean and tidy?

  • Does the jointing appear to be undertaken competently?

  • Is the joint being constructed in accordance with the appropriate jointing instruction?

  • HV Jointing
  • Are jointers satisfactorily trained up to and including 66kV jointing?

  • Has the Permit to work been issued (is it required), is the Permit to work being followed as per OSR’s

  • Is the jointing area clean, dry and tidy?

  • Is there adequate access and egress to joint holes or scaffolds?

  • Is there an appropriately detailed joint assembly instruction available?

  • Are appropriate specialised tools available and in good condition?

  • Is a soft flame heat torch used for heat shrink insulation?

  • Is PVC abrasion satisfactory for moisture seals?

  • Is XLPE insulation adequately smoothed and cleaned (degreased)?

  • Is adequate care taken when fitting conductor connectors?

  • Is adequate care taken when fitting stress control insulation?

  • Is joint resin adequately mixed and safely handled?

  • Is correct PPE worn for the job being undertaken?

  • Does the jointing appear to be undertaken competently?

  • Is the joint being constructed in accordance with the appropriate jointing instruction?

  • 132kV Jointing
  • Are jointers satisfactorily trained for 132kV jointing?

  • Has the Permit to work been issued (is it required), is the Permit to work being followed as per OSR’s?

  • Is the jointing area moisture, dirt and dust free (dry lined)?

  • Is the jointing area adequately protected from the weather?

  • Is there adequate lighting and heating provided?

  • Is there adequate access and egress to joint holes or scaffolds?

  • Is there satisfactory storage provided for jointing materials?

  • Is there an appropriately detailed joint assembly instruction available?

  • Are appropriate specialised tools available and in good condition?

  • Are records retained for identification of which material were installed on each cable/phase i.e. stress cones, specialised connectors etc.?

  • Is the jointing area kept clean and tidy?

  • Does the jointing appear to be undertaken competently?

  • Is the joint being constructed in accordance with the appropriate jointing instruction?

  • NERS-12 Distribution Substation
  • When completing an audit, the auditor shall ensure that all works are carried out by competent staff and they will be looking for conformity with the audit criteria which in all cases shall be compliance with the Lloyds Register NERS Requirements Document, technical specifications, working instructions and any other specified requirements of a customer or contract relevant to the task being undertaken.

  • During the audit the auditor will make a note of any non conformance & send an action with priority to the relevant project/site manager.

  • Priority: High (Major Deficiency) Medium (Minor Deficiency) Low (Observations)

  • Is the substation base constructed to the correct specification?

  • Are records maintained of concrete used (check delivery note specification)?

  • Are 7 & 28 days concrete cube strength tests recorded and checked?

  • Is the substation enclosure satisfactorily completed to specification?

  • Is the internal lighting and power satisfactorily complete?

  • Is the installed switchgear and transformer to the correct specification?

  • Are any internal cable trenches satisfactorily competed to specification?

  • Is any internal cables HV or LV on trays or cleats satisfactorily installed?

  • Is the earthing systems satisfactorily installed and tested?

  • Is the installation of metering equipment satisfactorily completed?

  • Is the protection commissioned and test results documented?

  • Are the substation labels, circuit names and danger notices fitted?

  • Is the security arrangements (doors, locks etc.) satisfactorily completed?

  • Is the final testing and commissioning documented?

  • Are the asset details satisfactorily recorded?

  • Is the adoption hand over satisfactorily documented?

  • Does the substation construction appear to be undertaken competently?

  • Is the site internal and external clean and tidy?

  • NERS-13 Primary and Grid Substations
  • When completing an audit, the auditor shall ensure that all works are carried out by competent staff and they will be looking for conformity with the audit criteria which in all cases shall be compliance with the Lloyds Register NERS Requirements Document, technical specifications, working instructions and any other specified requirements of a customer or contract relevant to the task being undertaken.

  • During the audit the auditor will make a note of any non conformance & send an action with priority to the relevant project/site manager.

  • Priority: High (Major Deficiency) Medium (Minor Deficiency) Low (Observations)

  • Are adequate temporary site office, welfare and stores in place?

  • Is the site managed in accordance with the CDM Regulations?

  • Is there adequate site supervision (resident engineer or manager) in place?

  • Are the necessary design specifications and drawings available on site?

  • Are the drawings satisfactorily controlled to ensure current revisions?

  • Are the substation building/bases constructed to the correct specification?

  • Are records maintained of concrete used (check delivery note specification)?

  • Are 7- & 28-days concrete cube strength tests recorded and checked?

  • Are the oil bunds/pumps tested and results recorded?

  • Is the substation enclosure satisfactorily completed to specification?

  • Is the internal lighting and power satisfactorily complete?

  • Is the auxiliary power supplies installed to design specification?

  • Is the switchgear to the correct specification and adequately installed?

  • Is the transformer to the correct specification and adequately installed?

  • Are any internal cable trenches satisfactorily competed to specification?

  • Are the internal cables HV or LV on trays or cleats satisfactorily installed?

  • Is the earthing systems satisfactorily installed (above and below ground)/tested?

  • Are the bus bars to specification and installed correctly?

  • Are the control panels bars to specification and installed correctly?

  • Is the automatic fire suppression system adequately installed and tested?

  • Is adequate documentation/certification available for electrical insulating oil?

  • Are emergency oil spillage arrangements in place?

  • Are the substation name, circuit names and danger notices fitted?

  • Is the security arrangements (doors, locks etc.) satisfactorily completed?

  • Is the perimeter security (electric fence, intruder alarms & surveillance systems) completed and commissioned?

  • Are the protection systems commissioned and test results documented?

  • Is the final testing and commissioning documented?

  • Are the asset details satisfactorily recorded?

  • Are the final installed drawings complete and authorised?

  • Is the installation of metering equipment satisfactorily commissioned?

  • Is the adoption hand over satisfactorily documentation?

  • Does the substation construction appear to be undertaken competently?

  • Is the site internal and external clean and tidy?

  • NERS-14 Maintenance
  • When completing an audit, the auditor shall ensure that all works are carried out by competent staff and they will be looking for conformity with the audit criteria which in all cases shall be compliance with the Lloyds Register NERS Requirements Document, technical specifications, working instructions and any other specified requirements of a customer or contract relevant to the task being undertaken.

  • During the audit the auditor will make a note of any non conformance & send an action with priority to the relevant project/site manager.

  • Priority: High (Major Deficiency) Medium (Minor Deficiency) Low (Observations)

  • Is the substation safe to work in?

  • Is the access/egress safe and has any fire suppressant systems locked off?

  • Is there a method statement available?

  • Is the Transformer correctly identified on the Safety Document?

  • Has the transformer been identified as oil filled or dry type?

  • If oil filled is report available or for dry type?

  • Is the management and transport of oil being carried out in line with Method Statement?

  • Is the switchgear to be worked on clearly and correctly identified on the Safety Document?

  • Is the correct EDSP Solutions HV report form available? (see appendix 1)

  • Are there any Operational Restrictions current on the switchgear being maintained?

  • If ‘YES’ to the question above, are modifications being carried out so that the OR can be removed?

  • Where oil is being handled is it in line with procedure?

  • Is the management of insulating gases in line with safe working practices?

  • Is there any LV maintenance associated with the shut down?

  • Is the LV plant to be maintained identified on the Safety Document?

  • Are staff conversant with the LV gear?

  • Are there any materials/equipment to be left on site?

  • Has the switchgear been marked or the Log Book updated with maintenance/modification date?

  • Has the site been left in a safe, tidy and secure manner?

  • Note: The auditor is at liberty to cover any other additional items during the audit if it would be appropriate to do so and this checklist should not be considered restrictive where it is thought there may be at weaknesses in knowledge, experience, technical competence or quality of work that may be identified by further investigation.

  • Comments

Final Page

  • ** Report Near Misses to info@edspsolutions.com

  • Note: The auditor is at liberty to cover any other additional items during the audit if it would be appropriate to do so and this checklist should not be considered restrictive where it is thought there may be at weaknesses in knowledge, experience, technical competence or quality of work that may be identified by further investigation.

  • Comments

  • Signature:

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.