Information
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Client / Site
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
-
Personnel
-
Facilitator Name
-
Facilitator level
-
Reviewer Name
-
Course
- COL
- TPE
- TSE
- LMR
- HPM
- SSTLS
- SS
- MHP
-
State
- NSW
- QLD
- ACT
- WA
- SA
- VIC
- NT
- TAS
- NZ
-
Workshop Date
-
Prior Review Date
SECTION 1: SELF EVALUATION OBSERVATIONS
-
EVALUATION SCALE: Not Applicable/Not Demonstrated (NA/ND) Needs Improvement (NI) Meets Standard (MS) Exceeds Standard (ES)
Part A - Evaluation of the LMA process
-
Pre-workshop set-up & preparation
-
Welcome, Opening, Introductions
-
Utilization of Point Maker - Debrief and Application
-
Utilization of Focus Goals
-
Wins for the period?
-
Win/Win Goal Discussion
-
Discussion: 'Best Ideas' - Application & Action (FAA Questions)
-
Additional discussion of Module Content / Learning Concepts
-
Utilisation: Plan of Action (Management Tools)
-
Discussion: win/win agreement goals (WWAGs)
-
Setting of new Assignments/Course Reviews
-
Workshop or Special Activities
-
Case Study
-
Project Management (COL/MHP)
-
Pace/Flow of Workshop - Timeliness of completion of workshop activities
-
Ability to direct workshop content and apply leaders guide
Part B - Key Observations of Facilitation Delivery (style & technique)
-
EVALUATION SCALE: Not Applicable/Not Demonstrated (NA/ND) Needs Improvement (NI) Meets Standard (MS) Exceeds Standard (ES)
-
Use of tone of voice
-
Use of body language
-
Use of whiteboard
-
Use of handouts
-
Use of LMA Posters
-
Ability to 'build' discussion
-
Ability to involve participants (including utilisation of workgroups)
-
Use of change of state
-
Listening
-
Questioning
-
Acknowledging
-
Challenging
-
Awareness/identification of opportunities to introduce or refer potential re-sales/other product/assessments etc
-
Personal insights & areas to focus on
-
Personal Facilitation Goals
SECTION 2: PEER REVIEWER OBSERVATIONS
-
EVALUATION SCALE: Not Applicable/Not Demonstrated (NA/ND) Needs Improvement (NI) Meets Standard (MS) Exceeds Standard (ES)
Part A - Evaluation of the LMA process
-
Pre-workshop set-up & preparation
-
Add media
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Welcome, Opening, Introductions
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Utilization of Point Maker - Debrief and Application
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Utilization of Focus Goals
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Wins for the period?
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Win/Win Goal Discussion
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Discussion: 'Best Ideas' - Application & Action (FAA Questions)
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Additional discussion of Module Content / Learning Concepts
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Utilisation: Plan of Action (Management Tools)
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Discussion: win/win agreement goals (WWAGs)
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Setting of new Assignments/Course Reviews
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Workshop or Special Activities
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Case Study
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Project Management (COL/MHP)
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Pace/Flow of Workshop - Timeliness of completion of workshop activities
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Ability to direct workshop content and apply leaders guide
-
Reviewer's Comments
Overall Rating to LMA Process
-
EVALUATION SCALE: Not Applicable/Not Demonstrated (NA/ND) Needs Improvement (NI) Meets Standard (MS) Exceeds Standard (ES)
-
Follows Leaders Guide format including optimal use of point makers & experiential activities
-
Has a current copy or advises when Leaders Guide was last reviewed
-
Aligns with LMA values, walk-the-talk, demonstration of quality in presentations
-
Reviewer comments on LMA process
Part B - Key Observations of Facilitation Delivery (style & technique)
-
EVALUATION SCALE: Not Applicable/Not Demonstrated (NA/ND) Needs Improvement (NI) Meets Standard (MS) Exceeds Standard (ES)
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Use of tone of voice
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Use of body language
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Use of whiteboard
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Use of handouts
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Use of LMA Posters
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Ability to 'build' discussion
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Ability to involve participants (including utilisation of workgroups)
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Use of change of state
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Listening
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Questioning
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Acknowledging
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Challenging
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
Awareness/identification of opportunities to introduce or refer potential re-sales/other product/assessments etc
-
Reviewer's Comments
-
OBSERVER'S COMMENTS (Peer Facilitator)
Review
-
Reviewer to ask the Facilitator to talk about which LMA value stands out for you as a facilitator?
-
Key Issues discussed with the Facilitator
-
Facilitator responses regarding any issues discussed
-
Are there any issues that need to be addressed by the DQT forum (eg resource material, Leaders's Guide, FBOL & assessment process)
-
Review & discuss SMART goals from previous peer review
Action
-
SMART goal/s identified from the evaluation
-
Target date