Information
-
Audit Title
-
Conducted on
-
Location
-
Auditor
-
Auditee
-
Audit Finding Grades:
1. Non Conformance
- Absences of, or the failure to implement and maintain G-MW's environmental management system (EMS) elements or relevant G-MW procedure; or
- A situation which raises significant doubt as to the capability of the system to achieve the policy, objectives and to satisfy the requirements of G-MW.
2. Opportunity For Improvement
A finding indicating a weakness in the system, a procedure, records or in the management of a particular activity. Or a situation, if left without corrective action or attention by G-MW would raise doubt as to the future capabilities of the management systems to achieve the policy, objectives and requirement of G-MW.
3. Observations
A finding warranting by the G-MW although not nessesarily requiring remedial action.
NOTE: Follow up of previous audits - Non-conformance 6 months and Opportunities for improvement 12 months.
Administration
-
Has the scope of the system changed?
-
Has the structure of the system changed?
-
Are team members clear on their tasks and scope of works?
-
Has top management assigned a representative/function with sufficient authority, awareness, competence & resources to ensure the establishment, maintenance & improvement of the EMS as well as to report to the top on environmental performance and present opportunities for improvement?
Policy
-
Does the policy commit to comply with or exceed applicable legal and other requirements?
-
Does the policy commit to the prevention of pollution?
-
Does the policy commit to continual improvement through environmental performance evaluation procedures and indicators?
-
Has the policy (most up to date) been appropriately communicated and displayed to wider G-MW?
Planning
Environmental Aspects
-
Does each team member have a clear understanding of the activities, products & services that fall within the scope of the system?
-
Have aspects been identified, risk rated and assigned controls or investigation programs?
-
Do a set of criteria exist to determine the significance of risk?
-
Is there a program in place to ensure aspects are reviewed periodically?
Legal & Other Requirements
-
Is there an up to date register or list of applicable legal and other requirements? (i.e. agreements with public authorities, voluntary principals, corporate requirements, agreements with community groups/NGOs)
-
Are G-MW's risks linked to the relevant legislation and other obligations?
-
Is there a process in place to anticipate and prepare for new or changed requirements?
-
Is there an effective process in place to track or monitor environmental performance against legal obligations?
Objectives & Targets
-
Are the objectives and targets for the EMS clearly set out and documented in some form of program?
-
Do performance indicators exist to track progress in achieving objectives and targets? Are there performance indicators measurable and clearly allocated to someone?
Implementation and Operation
-
Is the EMS reasonably resourced to carry outs its functions? i.e. to establish, implement, maintain and improve the EMS for current and future needs of the organisation.
-
Is the system encountering a shortage in resources/support in any of the following areas: infrastructure, information systems, training, technology, financial, human and any other resources specific to the EMS operation?
-
Are resources and their allocation reviewed periodically in conjunction with the Management Review to ensure their adequacy?
Competence, Training & Awareness
-
Is there a training program in place to identify the training needs of employees?
-
Does the design and development of the training plan address the defined training needs?
-
Have different training groups been identified and programs established for each?
-
Is there a system of documenting and monitoring the training received?
-
Is there a system of evaluating training received against training needs and requirements?
Communication
-
What internal communication procedures or processes exist to disseminate environmental communication? (i.e. demonstrating commitment and efforts to improve environmental performance as well as the results; raising awareness and encouraging dialogue about policy; performance and achievements; feedback and responding; promoting continual improvement). Are there adequate?
-
Is there a procedure for receiving, documenting, and responding to relevant communication from external parties? Is there a communication strategy?
Control of Documents
-
Is there a central register of all EMS documents? Does it contain a provision of review to identify documents that need updating?
-
Are the current versions of the relevant documents available at all locations where required?
-
Are all obsolete documents promptly removed from all points of issue and use?
Operation Controls
-
Are there a set of operational controls to meet the organisations environmental policy commitments, achieve its targets and objectives, comply with applicable legal and other requirements and to manage its significant environmental aspects?
-
Are these controls reviewed/evaluated periodically?
Emergency Preparedness & Response
-
Is there a procedure detailing how to identify potential emergency situations, accidents and other incidents?
-
Is this procedure reviewed periodically?
Checking
-
Is there an effective and systematic approach for measuring, monitoring and reporting environmental performance?
-
Is there a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance to legal requirements applicable to environmental aspects? Is this procedure periodically reviewed?
-
Is there a systematic method in identifying actual and potential non-conformity(ies), making connections and taking corrective and preventative action.
-
Does the audit system ensure that all organisational units/functions, system elements and the full scope of the EMS are audited periodically?
Management Review
-
Is a Management Review held annually to review the aspects of activities, products and services within the scope of the EMS?
-
Does top management contribute to the process of evaluating opportunities for improvement?
-
If opportunities are identified, are the implementation actions adequately resourced?