Information
-
Audit Title
-
Client
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Accompanied by
-
Location
-
Personnel
-
Company Division
- GDL Demolition Project
- Ovenden House
- P&G Scaffolding
- Datum Groundworks
- Horizon Environmental
- Truecut Diamond Drilling
- P&G Brickwork
-
This report is to be used by the assessor to inspect the site and record any safety, health and environmental hazards. The assessor should also pick an area of further inspection (e.g. SSOW, PUWER, Emergency arrangements etc) to ensure these are compliant with regulations and in- house procedures
-
Overview of current works
-
Have items from previous inspections been closed out?
Hazard spotting
-
Hazard
-
Close out time scale
-
Closed out by (sign and date)
-
Hazard definition
- 1st aid
- displayed information
- project paperwork
- site welfare
- COSHH
- fire precautions
- safety signage
- work @ height
- excavations
- plant & machinery
- lifting equipment
- crane
- edge protection
- temp works
- hot works
- isolations
- portable tools
- hoist
- MEWPS
- hoarding and fencing
- traffic routes
- access and egress
- PPE
- housekeeping
- environmental
- health hazards
- public interface
- site security
-
Root Causality
- Lack of training
- Behavioural failing
- Lack of resources
- Sub-contractor failing
- Supply chain failure
- System failure
- Supervisory failing
- Principal contractor issue
Environmental and Sustainability
-
Are COSHH items stored correctly?
-
Have suitable measures been implemented to protect drains from contamination by waste or COSHH items in the event of a spill?
-
Are personnel suitably trained in emergency spill containment/control?
-
Is there good planning in regard to spill protection?
-
Is there any evidence of spills on site?
-
Is waste being segregated by type?
-
Are waste tickets being completed correctly?<br>(Please provide examples)<br>
-
Is Environental monitoring being completed?
-
Is there any evidence of materials / liquids being deposited outside of the site boundary? (e.g. Mud on road etc.)<br>
Positive observations
-
Positive observation
-
Method Statement Review
-
Are there method statements in place for the works currently being undertaken on site?
-
Are the method statements sufficient to fully cover the extent of the works currently being undertaken on site?
-
Are the works being undertaken in compliance with the method statement?
-
If No please give details of non-compliance observed
Non - Compliance
-
Non - compliance noted
-
Causality
- Information Incomplete
- Information not updated
- Method statement not briefed out
- Method statement not followed
- Metodology not understood
- Procedure not followed
- Procedure not understood
- Procedure Inaccurate
-
Closed out (Sign and Date)
Procedural Compliance
-
Record area of inspection
Non - Compliance
-
Non - compliance noted
-
Causality
- Information Incomplete
- Information not updated
- Method statement not briefed out
- Method statement not followed
- Metodology not understood
- Procedure not followed
- Procedure not understood
- Procedure Inaccurate
-
Closed out (Sign and Date)
Health and Safety Information
-
Is there suitable provision for displayed Health and Safety information?
Inspection Sign off
-
Add signature
Hazard Rating
-
Please record the hazard rating using the following criteria for each occurrence:
24 hour - score 5
3 day - score 3
7 day - score 1
If items from previous inspection have not been closed out in allocated timescale immediately score additional 10 points
This will give you a total hazard rating for the site.
Next score the positive observations 1 point for each positive observation during the audit, then subtract the positive score from the hazard rating to give you the total audit score
