Title Page
-
Site conducted
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Client / Site
-
• The objective of this Independent audit is to randomly select a product sample undergoing inspection & to check that all associated procedures & requirements are in place to ensure that the finished product is airworthy & serviceable.
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
-
Personnel
System, process and product
Receipt and PO
-
Has the receipt inspection been carried out IAW the exposition in relation to this product?
-
undefined
-
Is the component in appropriate condition to commence the required maintenance?
-
photographic evidence of condition of parts.
-
Has the reciept inspection process been carried out IAW the exposition?
-
explanation
-
photographic evidence.
-
Does the RO specify the approved data including revision?
-
Does the RO provide a clear scope for the required maintenance?
-
Photograph of RO
-
does the customer RO match the component?
Customer supplied parts
-
Were any customer supplied parts incorporated into the component?
-
If applicable have any customer supplied parts for inclusion into the product been received IAW the exposition?
-
has the receipt inspection been carried out?
-
photographic evidence of appropriate receipt of customer supplied parts.
-
Has correct documentation been supplied by the customer?
-
photographic evidence of customer supplied documentation.
-
Have the parts been stored and labeled correctly?
-
photographic evidence of labeling and storage of parts
-
Has the customer GRN been recorded in the BLI?
-
Photograph of 'parts replaced section'.
-
Photos of Supplied parts receipt paperwork
Shelf life limited Items used or incorporated into the product
-
Have any Shelf life limited Items been used in the maintenace of; or incorporated into the product
-
Were the Shelf life limited Items used in the maintenance of; or incorporated into the product within their listed shelf life at the time of their use or incorporation?
-
Photographic evidence of expired product used
Use of calibrated tooling by employees.
-
Was any calibrated tooling used in the course of the required maintenance within it's recorded calibration interval at the time of its use?
-
Photographic evidence of calibration status of calibrated tooling.
-
Were GSE items such as benches, assembly platforms and cages in serviceable condition and if applicable, inspected within the scheduled time period?
-
Photographic evidence of condition of work surfaces and or GSE including inspection tags if applicable.
Cleanliness of maintenance facility
-
Is the work area tidy?
-
Photographic evidence of cleanliness of work space
-
Is the product free from contaminants?
-
Is there sufficient room to carry out the required maintenance?
-
Photographic evidence of space available for maintenance.
-
Is the segregation of activities adequate?
-
Photographic evidence of segregation of activities.
-
Are hazardous waste materials disposed of IAW DEP guidelines?
-
Photographic evidence of disposal of hazardous waste.
current maintenance data
-
does the technician have access to controlled maintenance data?
-
photographic evidence of technicians controlled data including version.
-
currency of technicians controlled data against CDB
-
currency of CDB controlled data against sponsor version.
-
Does the BLI reflect the current maintenance data?
-
photographic evidence of controlled data reference in BLI
-
Are any engineering orders necessary to carry out the required maintenance?
-
Does the technician have access to the engineering order?
-
photographic evidence of engineering order.
-
undefined
-
verify currency of engineering order against holders copy
-
Is the technician aware of the procedure for reporting perceived errors in the maintenance data
-
Name of technician interviewed.
Airworthiness Directives.
-
Has the customer identified any AD requirements in their RO?
Maintenance documentation/CRS.
-
Note the current revision of the BLI and check it against the CDB,
-
Is the technicians copy of the BLI the latest version as recorded in the CDB?
-
Is the technician aware of the precedence of the approved data over the BLI?
-
Has block 1(release for maintenance) been signed by an approved person?
-
photographic evidence of the completion of block 1.
-
Is block 2 (stage of maintenance completions) signed and up to date?
-
photographic evidence of the completion of block 2.
-
Has block 3 (records of component replacements and unserviceabilitys) been correctly filled out?
-
photographic evidence of the completion of block 3.
-
Has a record of calibrated tooling used in the course of the required maintenance been made in block 3 of the BLI?
-
photographic evidence of the recording of calibrated tooling used.
-
Has block 4 (Final inspection certification) been completed by an authorised person?
-
photographic evidence of the completion of block 4 by an authorised person.
-
Is a CASA form 1 and/or ANDI report required for this type of maintenance?
-
Is the signatory to the CASA form 1 and/or report authorised for Release to Service?
-
photographic evidence of the completion of CASA form 1 and/or ANDI report by an authorised employee.
-
Is the maintenance complete?
-
Photographic evidence of the completion of maintenance.
-
Has the maintenance been carried out IAW CASA Part 42 and Part 145?
-
Explain the nature of the failure to carry out maintenance IAW the above regulations.
-
In the opinion of the subject matter expert below, is the product serviceable?
-
Name of subject matter expert.
Records for the operator.
-
Has the documentation been made available to the operator?
-
Photographic evidence of the use of the Dispatch Checklist.
-
Are other records ie. EO's, SB's, AD's, and lifed items supplied if required?
-
In the course of maintenance, were any major defects, or suspected unapproved parts identified?
-
Were the major defects and/or suspected unapproved parts handled IAW the exposition?
-
Has any part of the required maintenance been subcontracted to another person or organisation?
-
Was this captured by the use of a form 23 Request for subcontracted maintenance?
-
Photographic evidence of the use of form 23.
-
Explanation of the failure to use form 23.
-
Were any maintenance errors detected during stage of maintenance inspections or during final inspections?
-
Photographic evidence of errors found during stage of maintenance or final inspections.
-
Is the technician aware of the procedure for reporting suspected maintenance errors?
-
Name of technician interviewed.
-
Did the technician have sufficient time to complete the required maintenance?
-
Explanation of time restriction.
-
Is the technicians RTE available?
-
Photographic evidence of availability of RTE.
-
Is the technician authorised to carry out the required maintenance?
-
Photographic evidence of authorisation to carry out the required maintenance.
-
Are the technician's periodic authorisations up to date?
-
Photographic evidence of currency of periodic authorisations.
-
Is the technicians DAMP and Human Factors training current?
-
Photographic evidence of currency of DAMP and Human Factors training.
-
Is it deemed necessary to review the technicians authorisation to carry out the required maintenance at this time?
-
Name of supervisor or Responsible Manager.
-
Name of employee.
-
Photographic evidence of competence assess ment.
Compliance
-
Is the product under audit listed in the capabilities register?
-
is the exposition available on a PC to the staff member?