Titelseite

  • Client Company Logo

  • Document ID No.

  • Client

  • Title

  • Operator

  • Audit date

  • Audit Location(s)
  • Audit prepared by

CONTACTS & DISCLAIMER

  • Bildschirmfoto 2019-03-03 um 08.40.30.png
  • NCG Group KmG | NCG Aviation
    Tel. +41 786855034


    E-Mail a.gallati@ncg-aviation.com
    Internet www.ncg-aviation.com

  • This report has been prepared on the basis of information as made available to NCG. It provides basic information and is neither intended to provide any rights or causes of action, nor does it imply an express or implied warranty in relation to the Operator, its aircraft, its technical condition or aircraft documentation. NCG excludes any liability, under contract or law, for the contents hereof. All questions concerning this document should be addressed to NCG.

Operator Details

  • Name of Operator / Auditees

  • Contact Information of Auditee

  • Main Office / Headquarter address

INTRODUCTION & AUDIT CONDITIONS

INTRODUCTION

Statement about regualtory Operational approval/declaration or AOC (if applicable)

  • undefined

Statement Flight crew / Cabin Crew personnel qualifications

  • undefined

Statement about Audit Conditions

  • Aircraft Technical Status, MEL Items?

  • Audit checklist basis

SUMMARY AUDIT RESULTS

Audit Result

  • Areas, Procedures and Documents audited by NCG included the following:
    • Organization Structures and Organisation management manual (OMM), if applicable
    • OM-A, B, C and D, or PANS-OPS, NCC or EASA part CAT standards
    • AFM
    • QRH, EFB, Checklist
    • FDM (if applicable)
    • Flight preparation, briefings & execution
    • Flight Operations Manual, FCOM
    • Crew Training, Execution, Qualification, Knowledge level
    • Briefing pack, fuel, support documentation

    All these parts, on the basis of applicable EASA, FAA, ICAO regulations and best industry practice and we have reviewed the
    suitability of the infrastructure available to the operators staff, pilots and management personnel.
    1. Jumpseat / Flight deck observations during normal operations
    • Routine flights only - no line checks or training flights
    • No debriefings or post-flight interviews asking crews why they
    committed so many errors and/or undesired aircraft states
    2. Anonymous, confidential, and non-punitive data collection
    • No names, flight numbers, or other identifying information
    • Observer identity kept anonymous
    • Data used for safety purposes only – no disciplinary action
    3. Voluntary crew participation
    • Flight crews have the right to decline a LOSA observation
    • Typical denial rate is very low – 1 per 100 flights

    The supervision of the Operator’s activities lies with the competent National Aviation Authority (NAA).

LOSA Scoring Result

  • Flight Operations Status

  • Training

  • Ground Operations / OCC

Introduction, Definitions & Scoring

  • NCG Opinion
    We express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Crew Flight Management in relation to the conduct of flights and in relation to safeguarding the value of aircraft operated by them.
    It is NCG’s opinion that the audited Crew, operates within the applicable regulatory framework. The standard of operations is expressed in an overall expressions, numbering, grading and overall wording as described within the report.

Audit / Flight Demographics

  • City Pairs (e.g., PIT-CLT)

  • A/C Type (e.g., 737-300)

  • PF / PM

  • Time from Pushback to Gate Arrival (Hours:Minutes)

  • Late Departure? Delay Reason

  • Years experience for all airlines PIC + Years in position for this A/C

  • Years experience for all airlines SIC + Years in position for this A/C

  • Cumulated Years in automated A/C (i.e. Glass Cockpit, PBN)

  • Crew Familiarity (Crew has flown togehter before?)

FLIGHT OPERATIONS (FO) | GENERAL

Flight Operations

  • Status FLIGHT OPERATIONS

  • Description of the intended or conducted operations and standards

SOP

  • Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) are, together with processes and procedures, the means by which aviation organisations standardise their flight operations activities. They may also refer to manufacturer or best industry practices.

  • SOP availability and assurance

  • Performance calculation and IRT, OEI T/O & Approach, Landing

  • OEI company routes, Drift Downs, RTE selection | CMD confirmation & Situational Awareness

  • QRH, FCOM, Checklist update - in line with SOP

  • On board documentation oversight | JL / Return envelope inspection (Fuel, Oil, etc.), Time/Cycle recording and statistics | Emergency Bulletins communication

Planning Stage | Behavioral Markers

  • SOP BRIEFING | The required briefing was interactive and operationally thorough

  • PLANS STATED | Operational plans and decisions were communicated and acknowledged

  • WORKLOAD ASSIGNMENT | Roles and responsibilities were defined for normal and non-normal situations

  • CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT | Crew members developed effective strategies to manage threats to safety

Execution Stage | Behavioral Markers

  • MONITOR / CROSSCHECK | Crew members actively monitored and cross-checked systems and other crew members

  • WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT | Operational tasks were prioritized and properly managed to handle primary flight duties

  • VIGILANCE | Crew members remained alert of the environment and position of the aircraft

  • AUTOMATION MANAGEMENT | Automation was properly managed to balance situational and/or workload requirements

Review Stage | Modify Behavioral Markers

  • EVALUATION OF PLANS Existing plans were reviewed and modified when necessary — Crew decisions and actions were openly analyzed to make sure the existing plan was the best plan

  • INQUIRY Crew members asked questions to investigate and/or clarify current plans of action — Crew members not afraid to express a lack of knowledge - “Nothing taken for granted” attitude

  • ASSERTIVENESS Crew members stated critical information and/or solutions with appropriate persistence — Crew members spoke up without hesitation

Overall Flight

  • This narrative should include your overall impressions of the crew.

  • COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT | Good cross talk – flow of information was fluid, clear, and direct

  • LEADERSHIP | Captain showed leadership and coordinated flight deck activities | In command, decisive, and encouraged crew participation

Findings on Flight Operations

  • New Findings on Flight Operations

  • Findings on FO

FLIGT OPERATIONS (FO) | LOSA Operation Audit

Predeparture / Taxi-Out

  • Fueling

  • Defect / MEL handling

  • Cockpit Preparation

  • Outside Check

  • Loading

  • Briefing

  • ENG Start and Taxi out

  • PAX Handling

  • Your narrative should provide a context. What did the crew do well? What did the crew do poorly? How did the crew perform when confronted with threats, crew errors, and significant events? Also, be sure to justify your behavioral ratings.

Takeoff / Climb

  • Line-Up

  • Take-Off

  • Initial Climb / Acceleration / Level Offs

  • Your narrative should provide a context. What did the crew do well? What did the crew do poorly? How did the crew perform when confronted with threats, crew errors, and significant events? Also, be sure to justify your behavioral ratings.

Cruise

  • MAX / Optimum Operating ALT

  • Route Optimization, WX situation handling

  • Your narrative should provide a context. What did the crew do well? What did the crew do poorly? How did the crew perform when confronted with threats, crew errors, and significant events? Also, be sure to justify your behavioral ratings.

Descent

  • Was the approach briefed before the TOD? (Yes / No)

  • Descend profile optimization

  • Sterile cokpit below FL100?

  • Explain why

  • Your narrative should provide a context. What did the crew do well? What did the crew do poorly? How did the crew perform when confronted with threats, crew errors, and significant events? Also, be sure to justify your behavioral ratings.

Approach and Landing

  • Your narrative should provide a context. What did the crew do well? What did the crew do poorly? How did the crew perform when confronted with threats, crew errors, and significant events? Also, be sure to justify your behavioral ratings.

  • Approach type flown?

  • Use of automation: Adequate use of equipment

  • Configuration management: Optimization?

  • Callouts, and S/A, Crew discipline

  • Approach stable (latest 1000' AGL IMC, 500' AGL VMC)

  • Engines spooled

  • Safe landing technique

Taxi In | Parking

  • Taxi Route, Vigilance, Discipline

  • Parking

  • Securing of Aircraft

TRAINING (TRN)

Training

  • Status Training

Training Procedures & Records

  • Training Records, UPRT, LVO etc.

  • Licenses & Ratings valid

GROUND OPERATIONS (GO)

Dispatch | OCC

Flight Planning & Following

  • This refers to the flight cycle from tactical planning through to after-flight administration.

  • Your narrative should provide a context. What did the crew do well? What did the crew do poorly? How did the crew perform when confronted with threats, crew errors, and significant events? Also, be sure to justify your behavioral ratings.

OCC

  • OCC Cooperation

  • Sales & ticketing process / liability limitations

  • Dispatch process / MX, DDL Item coordination

Flight Planning

  • Briefing pack, overflight permits etc.

  • Destination Aerodrome, Alternate Selection & Service Supplier, Suitability Gerneral

  • FTL, FRM calculations & crewing

  • Fuel planning

  • ETOPS / EROPS Route and contingency planning (if applicable)

  • RTE, Matching a/c NAV Data Base?

  • EFB Transfer / JL control

Findings GO

  • New Findings on GO

  • Findings on GO

Signatory

  • This audit report / survey is governed by the Contract terms and conditions as laid down in the Service Agreement between NCG and the client.

  • Zürich, on

  • Managing Director

ANNEX | Certificates & Approvals

  • The Operator shall be possession of either and AOC in case of commercial air transport and Operator Licence, as well as an associated CAMO (or competent National Aviation Authoirty (NAA) equivalent) approval. All documents are separately issued and need supervision of expiry (if applicable) and associated approval conditions.

    In case of private air transport, not for hire or reward, EASA rules require NCC declaration (if the aicraft operated fall under the applicable definitions), or compliance with NCO and applicable special operations specifications (i.e. Part-SPA, PBN, etc.) for the intended aircraft utilization.

Approvals

  • Commercial Operation?

NCC or eqivalent declaration

  • Number

  • Issue Date

  • Validity

  • Evidence

AOC

  • Number

  • Issue Date

  • Validity

  • AOC

Ops Specs

  • Number

  • Issue Date

  • Validity

  • Ops Specs

CAMO & CAME Approvals

  • Number

  • Issue Date

  • Validity

  • CAMO & CAME

Other Approvals and Certificates

  • EFB

  • Ops Manuals

  • Various

Following documents were checked by the auditor

  • List of Nominated persons, Organigram

  • Ops Manual Approvals

  • CAMO, CAME, Maintenance Program approval (if not listed earlier in AOC)

  • Radio Station Licese

  • Aircraft Documents, CoR's, CoA's, ARC's, Insurances, etc.

  • Mass & Balance record

  • Modification Log Book(s)

  • AD (airframe) listing and control (IT MX control proof acceptable)

  • AFM

  • Crew Manuals (Ops Manuals, SMS Manual, OMM, NASP, FCOM, CSPM, etc.)

  • DDL

  • accident, incident summary, investigation and statments

  • Mandatory occrrence reports, root cause analysis and / or risk assessments

  • Aircraft Damage / Repair Mapping, statements and Release to service forms, signature and stamps

  • Certificate of Company registration

  • The Auditor / inspector herewith states to have worked in a thoroughly manner, using all available documents, and resources for evidence retrieval.
    His judgement and assessments / valuations / scorings are offered in good faith and are not intended to be biased.

  • Signature of Auditor

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.