Post event Check - Gas

Post work check

• Post work check to confirm compliance with Gas safety standards and RMPFS ltd safety management system

• Conducted on

  Date

• Office Name

• Address
  Address

• Prepared by

• GasSafe Registration No.

• RMPFS Job No.

• Job Description

• Date work was completed

• Select date

  Date

• Direct Labour or Subcontractor?

  Direct Labour

  Subcontractor

• Subcontractor registration No.

• GasSaferegistration No., of operative carrying out work on behalf of the subcontractor

• GasSafeRegister Licence No.

• Have YOU consulted with the PIC to let him/her know why you're there and to find out any hazards or issues that may interfere with your visit?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the Site Log available?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Action to PIC to ensure that the SLB is available at all times, or action to RMG to supply a new or replacement SLB

• Have YOU consulted the safe systems of work for the areas and conditions under which the Post check is taking place?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Why not?

• What, if any SSOWs will be consulted to ensure safety in the work area?

General competence

• Are those who worked (are working) on the job under check correctly registered with GasSafeRegister for the work being undertaken? <br>Or under the direct supervision of one who is?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Issue an action to the line manager to contact planning to prevent this happening again. Action to engineer to explain why? If a subcontractor: Action to subcontractor seeking an explanation action to Purchasing to prevent further use of this subcontractor pending investigation. Action to YOU to postcheck some previous jobs

• Is there evidence in the site log for the work being checked?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Issue a reminder to the manager that signing into the site log is Mandatory.

• Is the work site acceptably clean and tidy?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is there any waste from the job left on site?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Issue an action to the engineer and manager or to subcontractor to get this disposed of correctly.

Certification

• Is certificate for the work available on CRD

  Yes

  No

• Contact line manager by email and issue action to chase this failure

• Has the work documentation (Electronic or hard copy) been completed to a satisfactory standard?

  Yes

  No

• Detail defects in documentation, then issue action to engineer / line manager to amend or re-issue certificate.

• Has any remedial work been carried out?

  Yes

  No

• Has the remedial work been carried out to a satisfactory standard?

  Yes

  No

• Issue action to make good this deficiency

• Are there any Gas Safety situations noted or referred to on the certificate under check?

  Immediately Dangerous

  At Risk

  None

• Has the ID procedure been carried through correctly?

  Yes

  No

• Detail deficiencies and remedial action required and taken

• Has the AR procedure been carried through correctly?

  Yes

  No

• Detail deficiencies and remedial action required and taken

Gas Safety

• Is the ventilation sufficient and correctly placed?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Issue an action to the engineer and manager to get this dealt with correctly.

• Are any installed interlocks operating correctly?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Issue an action to the engineer and manager to get this dealt with correctly.

• Are the provisions for flueing, i.e. Condition, route, termination, fixings, and performance satisfactory?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Issue an action to the engineer and manager to get this dealt with correctly.

• Are safety controls and operational controls functional?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• It may be necessary to take action under the GIUSP / IGEM/UP/11

• Detail defects and any actions taken in response (ID/AR remedials etc.)

• Details of any safety control not checked.

• Is (are) the associated pipework, materials, fixings, and valves installed correctly?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Issue an action to the engineer and manager to get this corrected.

• Are there any gas leaks at disturbed joints?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Detail defects, repair if possible otherwise act for safety.

• Flue gas analysis required?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Input analysis results

• Are there any Gas unsafe situations existing at the work site?

  Immediately Dangerous

  At Risk

  None

• Details and remedial actions taken

• Helpdesk incident No

• Gas emergency No.

• Is this likely to be a RIDDOR re portable incident under the gas regulations?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Make the appliance or system safe without disturbing it, if possible take photographic evidence of the relevant areas of concern.
  Contact:
  RMPFS line manager for the building
  PIC for the building
  

• Details of defects and of actions taken.

• Helpdesk incident No.

• Has the appliance or installation been left in a safe condition and functioning correctly?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Issue an action to the engineer and manager or sub contractor informing him of the defects and if necessary make safe using the GIUSP / IGEM/UP/11 procedures..

Summary and sign off.

• Are there any exclusions, limitations or comments to this report?

  Yes

  No

• Details here

• Signed

  Sign

• Select date

  Date